There Can be only One Way!

The Southern Activist

VERBATIM

 

Brooks Simpson has went one bridge too far. This continual perversion of random thoughts, all the while attempting to belittle and/or poke fun at anyone who doesn’t match his intelligence, is quite pitiful. We have a person who claims so many titles of merit, yet cannot get his ego under control, especially in regards to the vileness, arrogance and disgust which shows through in his attacks on so many people and groups.

What is it that drives a man insane because of a war, and the country that lost that war 150 years ago? It’s said that a definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again in the hopes of finding a different result. Does Simpson expect the descendents of those conquered people to roll over and kiss his feet when he antagonizes, belittles and ridicules them? Does he have a secret desire to be worshiped as a conquering king, with his very words seen as Law? He can’t say in fairness that he corrects both sides and is fair to

both sides, because the numbers of his articles and posts does not bear this out (with a view that represents only one type of people, from one part of the country). Maybe it’s time to look at Simpson’s bigotry and prejudice for a change?

Simpson’s latest gaffe is to once again mock another pro-Southerner. Me! Simpson has a proven history of picking out what he considers weak statements, which he then assumes would be hard for the author to defend. Most of the time he picks simple mistakes such as names, dates and places, and uses these mistakes to disqualify the author from having any merits or credibility – especially in regards to the entire subject of pro-Southern history, heritage and culture. Yet it’s Simpson who has the log in his eye, and is also subject to mistakes…mistakes much worse than from those people he singles out. Yet sadly, he gets away with this every day. It’s time to come clean Simpson! It’s time to show off that log in your eye!

For instance: Why did you pull that 2^nd debate from your Crossroads blog? Does your mind need refreshing concerning that 2^nd exchange/debate? And why should I or anyone allow their children to be taught by Marxists and revisionists such as you? Yes, I can most definitely make the term “Marxist” apply and stick to you, and John Lucas has NOTHING to do with that! (again, see Simpson’s post on Lamb Here).

And Simpson pretends he doesn’t know he is a Marxist? Better stated according to Simpson’s own response is, he doesn’t have the knowledge to understand his own Marxist philosophy and ideology. A person cannot grasp the concepts of history regardless to the simple facts concerning dates, names and places – unless they also know and understand the philosophy used in forming and applying concepts (as a basis of Political Science). Simpson proves he can remember simplistic dates, names, places, documents…etc.., but he fails miserably in relating all these things in the study of Political Science.

From the beginnings of written history there has been a plethora of writings concerning government and the body politics. Even the Christian Scriptures references governments and their relationship to a moral society. There are many hundreds of philosophers to draw information from throughout history in helping understand, and in forming opinions as to how politics and government best serves the people. For the sake of simplicity I’m going to use two philosophers: John Locke and Karl Marx. Both represent the culmination of their respective philosophies and ideologies. (Note to the reader: I refer to both philosophy and ideology as both are related. Philosophy being the faith and understanding one holds, while ideology is the practice of it. It’s very similar to faith and religion – with religion being the practice of one’s faith.)

 

Simpson asks; “I’d love to know what makes me a Marxist. Heck, it would be interesting to see whether Mike Lamb understands what it means to be a Marxist.” I don’t need anyone telling me what a Marxist is, nor do you – unless you are really that ignorant. Yet there you are playing naïve and ignorant by asking the question. Which is it; Are you actually ignorant? Or are you being coy and pretending to be ignorant? You’ve read John Locke just as I have. But how much? And how much do you agree with John Locke? You’ve also read Karl Marx and Engels, just as I have. Again, how much I don’t know. But it’s obvious that you agree with much of his writings because your ideology concerning revisionist history and political science agrees with much of Marx’s and Engel’s writings. Therefore, it becomes a moot point for me to explain to you what Marxism entails, as you already know what it entails. If you don’t know what Marxism entails, then all the more reason you don’t qualify for the position you now claim.

Let’s cut the chase Simpson; Why don’t you just tell us how many planks of the Communist Manifesto you agree with, either in part or in full? While that’s only a small scratch on the surface concerning Marxism, it goes far in defining what a person believes in their other opinions concerning political science, and religion (including humanism and Christianity, as well all their beliefs concerning life). If you disagree and deny any claims to the 10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto, then we can ascertain what you believe concerning John Locke, Natural Law and self-determination. But then again, I already know you don’t believe in self-determination as the free will of man, but rather as the “collective” form of man, once again drawing upon Marx as a collective.

Of course, I don’t know what I’m talking about according to Simpson and his minions. No Southerner knows anything compared to any Yankee – and that’s a point that has been pushed down all of America’s throats for the past 150 years. It’s another form of control over your enemies. There’s nothing I can say, short of agreeing with Simpson on practically everything he says, that would change his opinion of me – and then I’d have reservations on that opinion simply because I’m a Southerner. I don’t claim any special privileges by government education. Yet all that I can be attacked with is by insults, ad-hominum style. I find it a shame and pity that a man making such claims of educational knowledge as Simpson cannot handle himself any better that what he has shown against me, and any other Southerner who may have never benefited from the “higher” education he has been privileged to receive.

Sadder still is the fact he uses his claimed talents to teach and train other young adults to be good socialists just like him. In return Simpson receives a university salary, speaking fees for speaking around the world, promotional fees, and most likely other revenue from activities we know nothing about – and people call this patriotism. People don’t know real patriotism, because people such as Simpson have been teaching their version of patriotism – and not what patriotism really is! All because the world has a group of people who wishes to control and force their views onto everyone else – all the while forcing those people to pay for it. It’s nothing short of forced slavery by mob rule, through a tyrannical Federal Government!

For further reading:

• Missouri Tenth’s article by Mike Lamb: Collectivism by Force
•  Lamb vs. Simpson: Historians divide over roots of American North and South