Wednesday, July 3, 2013

IRS' Lois Lerner Demands Immunity For Her Testimony

 https://www.nytimes.com/images/2013/05/22/opinion/5222013lerner/5222013lerner-blog480.jpg

Oh, boy.  She better have good protection, because I am sure the PTB do not want her to talk.

IRS official Lois Lerner has a price for her testimony before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee: Immunity.

"They can obtain her testimony by doing it the easy way … immunity," her attorney, William Taylor told Politico Tuesday.

Earlier in the day, the committee passed a resolution declaring Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights on May 22, when she delivered a statement denying she did anything wrong before she refused to answer questions that could incriminate her, reports Human Events.

The committee vote was along a straight 22-17 party line split, with House Democrats disagreeing that she should have to testify about her role in one of the largest scandals to hit the Obama administration to date.

 More @ Newsmax

6 comments:

  1. I've read different opinions on this. Mostly yes, try and get a bigger fish. But that's just it, try. She probably won't say much that way. I say fuck that. Jail her till she comes clean and she will sing like a canary and hopefully her testimony leads to the White House.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hopefully her testimony leads to the White House.

      Where it assuredly leads, no ifs, ands or buts in my mind.

      Delete
  2. Immunity, my a## !

    Bring her before the committee, and when she refuses to testify, throw her in jail for contempt until she does testify.

    Thats what would happen to you or me if we were in that situation.

    Bob
    III

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thats what would happen to you or me if we were in that situation.

      Precisely.

      Delete
  3. I thought she said. "She did nothing wrong." If that is true why would she need immunity. If that was not true did she not just commit perjury to the House Committee. I believe that in its self is a felony.


    Badger

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said and inconvenient facts for her and the rest of the liberals.

      Delete