Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Why couldn't Healthcare.gov validate Obama's identity?

 Where's the ID?

The White House appears to have dropped a bombshell when it explained to the press why White House staff in Washington enrolled President Obama in Obamacare instead of Obama himself.

Officials said it was because HealthCare.gov could not verify Obama’s identity.

Here is what Ed Henry, Fox News White House correspondent, reported on air:

“Somebody who’s not waiting in line to enroll is the president of the United States. We learned today from the White House. Initially, they said he signed up for what they called a bronze plan, paying about four hundred dollars a month in premiums. But, then they came back to us and said – ‘Well, wait. He didn’t actually enroll. They said his staff did it and that’s because of his unique circumstance obviously, as commander-in-chief, that his personal information is not in various government databases, so Healthcare.gov could not actually verify his identity, oddly enough. So, he had to do it in person this weekend, so he was signing up for the D.C. exchange, but his staff did it.”

A CBS report in Washington, likewise, explained White House staff had to go to an “in-person” Obamacare site to sign up Obama for coverage.

The Fox News report,  noted by the Gateway Pundit, set off a round of speculation on the Internet.

What information was so sensitive for Obama that it had to be excluded from government databases?

Clearly, the information was not his Social Security Number or his birth records, because the White House has claimed to have made public both.

On May 5, 2010, WND published a report documenting that WND researchers were able to find, through an ordinary search of the Social Security database online, the Social Security Number Obama has been using.

In the same article, WND also reported Obama was using a Social Security Number set aside by the Social Security Administration for applicants with addresses in Connecticut. Public records, meanwhile, provide no evidence Obama ever had an address in the state.

More @ WND


  1. What's the old saying? Hoist on his own petard, I think. It will all be made known in time.

  2. This guy has gotten so far on so many falsehoods it boggles the mind. For those of us who have to work hard to get anywhere, it certainly rankles to see this bounder get into all the best schools, have them paid for, and on nothing but false representations about his origins.

    Never has so unqualified a person gone so far with so little question. I keep waiting for him to piss off the wrong person, who then spills the beans on him, but that hasn't happened so far, unfortunately.

    1. unfortunately.

      You got that right.

    2. Rather, let's hope that the next person who decides to spill the beans doesn't somehow manage to "suicide" by shooting themselves in the Back of the head.

    3. Orly Taitz says she's going to be careful not to get Breitbarted.

  3. Doesn't that make his insurance purchase a "straw-buy?" Last time I checked, buying insurance involves signing a contract; signing a contract in someone else's name is criminal fraud.
    To go with the other criminal fraud being perpetrated by the poseur in chief. Hoist by your own petard indeed; especially when a proper Congress and Executive decide to actually vet this person properly -which will of course unseal the records indicating Indonesian citizenship, Connecticut Social Sec. number etc. etc. and hopefully will be promptly followed up with a complete invalidation of every law this fraud signed, withdrawal of Secret Service protection and a "FISA Court" (illegal under the Fourth Amendment) approved drone strike.

    1. The fact that the commies have gotten away with this so far is truly mind boggling.

    2. A criminal government which isn't even open to debate.