Friday, August 22, 2014

Communists Descend on Ferguson

Via Susan

http://03546f5.netsolhost.com/WordPress/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/commiemarch.jpg

I’ve stayed out of the Ferguson controversy. These racial conflagrations are awful, and I learned long ago that any conservative who wades in, even with the best intentions, is eviscerated by the political left. Liberals have decided that all conservatives in their ideological universe need to be racists, and they passionately resist letting anything convince them otherwise.

I don’t know enough to know who, exactly, is to blame in Ferguson. That said, here is something I do know, and that I think would benefit readers as they assess the growing animosities in Missouri:

I’ve long studied the antics of the American Communist Party, from literally the very beginning. I’ve sat in archives and stared at the first documents that American communists excitedly sent from their offices at 1219 Blue Island Avenue in Chicago to Soviet Comintern headquarters in Moscow. I’ve spent hundreds of hours reading old copies of the Soviet-funded and Soviet-directed Daily Worker. I’ve read countless memoirs by communists who joined the Party, ran it, or even spied for Moscow. I daily check the websites of Communist Party groups.

All of that is background to this fact -- well-known to anyone who has carefully watched the Communist Party: Communists have long vigorously targeted black Americans for their causes and interests.

17 comments:

  1. And those within the patriot movement would do well to consider the points AT raises.
    Communist agiprop is active WITHIN their ranks. Has been all along. Useful idiots.
    Sometimes they like to have a high profile and sometimes not.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't mean to sound negative but I've had some experience with the above.

    First I was a contributor and commenter to American Stinker, oops I mean American Thinker for a couple of years, back in early 2000s. I also commented in more recent years. However I come to realize that AT is actually an advanced neoconservative blog. Some of my articles were never published and no excuse ever given. Also several of my comments have in the past been censored. And this was when I was somewhat more mild in my writings. I did have several occurrences of people who call themselves conservatives who would vilify me over things/topics/statements that most all of you here would agree with me over. I say this from us being more paleoconservative than just conservative. (From our culture.) About 3-4 years ago I went onto the blog to make some comments and I received a message I had been banned. No reason given... SO much for them...

    As for Paul Kengor, first he is a neoconservative. He knows quite a bit of details on many topics and has an excellent photographic memory. This is his strong point. And he can win many arguments over his sheer ability of memorization. However as academically gifted as Paul Kengor is, he is EXTREMELY weak in philosophy; for example, the relationship of universal truths, which lends credence to what we know as Inalienable Rights. He simply can't relate this from the philosophers to legitimate practice. That is just one example. An example from his personal writings, he doesn't equate liberalism with communism. If one was referring to liberalism from the European POV he would be correct. But liberalism from American political sciences IS part of communism, and I can list and show how this is done, in detail... In short this is because Kengor leaves out the philosophy of *Humanism* in most all of his studies and works. To know humanism is to also understand the basis of communism, or better stated, Marxism, as that is the root word for globalism, communism, socialism, fascism and their sub variants.

    Just wanted to make ya'll aware...

    Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur

    ReplyDelete
  3. BTW-- Concerning communists in the US gommit. Sen. Joe McCarthy was absolutely right. I have articles from research that proves his allegations to congress. Much of which was only made available after the fall of the USSR.

    A clear distinction can be shown that the liberals were the ones who opposed McCarthy, however there were many Republicans that appeared to be conservatives that also opposed McCarthy. It was simply a open as well as covert operation by those two sides to smear McCarthy, one that helped drive him to his death. Those Republicans who refer to themselves as moderates are actually liberals hiding behind conservatives ideals. In real life their true nature comes and that is why a REAL conservative will be banned from a so called conservative website such as AT. All the FOX News shows on air now are similar.... Bill O'Reilly, Greta van Susteren, Hannity, Huckabee and all the rest are all the same.... Glenn Beck was the worst of them all, but he's not there today. OTOH Judge Andrew Napalitano has been the ONLY truly paleoconservative with our beliefs to have even had a FOX show. And why do you really think Napalitano was really fired from FOX News?

    Just trying to show ya'll how much you have been manipulated and fooled...

    Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Judge Andrew Napalitano has been the ONLY truly paleoconservative with our beliefs to have even had a FOX show. And why do you really think Napalitano was really fired from FOX News?

      Absolutely and immediately after his spiel concerning the government which mentioned "supposed" numerous times, as I remember.

      Delete
  4. This is all good information from Mike - never intended to communicate that Kengor's article was flawless. He does have many good points as do other NEO-C's. But, as with David Horowitz, Krauthammer, Will, et.al., they may make good points, too, but their underlying blind spots as cradle Libs/Lefties/Commies make me always look at what they say much more critically. We are all searching for the truth here on Block's blog. He doesn't censor us at all, and from what I know, he prints everything he receives in comments (right, Brock?). So, I may be fooled, I may be manipulated, but when given something concrete to Unfool me and Unmanipulate me, well, I welcome that information. Has Mike ever offered any of his pieces here, Brock?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. heir underlying blind spots as cradle Libs/Lefties/Commies make me always look at what they say much more critically.

      Absolutely.

      ==========

      he prints everything he receives in comments (right, Brock?)

      Except from Levin the Carpetbagger, who uses insults instead of arguments.

      =============

      Has Mike ever offered any of his pieces here, Brock?

      Once or twice before and I'm sure he is as fond of Levin as am I.......:)

      Delete
  5. You've also censored me, or simply overlooked posting a couple of articles and responses. But you haven't banned me yet.. (I only know of one post of comments that I had actually goofed by reading the article wrong, and I had responded wrongly. You simply printed my goof on that one stating so..)

    But I'll say this right now in favor of Sioux. He's got his act together! He said things I just didn't have time to add, and I am already long-winded. Most all neoconservatives make EXCELLENT talking points, and we can agree with most of what they say. But it suckers unknowing people to be easily led into believing things far removed from their normal thinking. This is called or is a form of *RECONSTRUCTION*

    However they are also like modern preachers, they can tell you a lot of gospel and leave you feeling good, but they never finish serving the meal. It's what they don't say that leaves you wondering. And of course even preachers will say things that not all members will find appetizing. Scratch in the pot and you will find them all hiding all sorts of things and bones.... So, you gotta be careful where you eat! Or is it what you believe from who?

    Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now that you mention it, there may have been one or two that I considered insulting. You may have not intended it so, though. Debating societies will come back in favor one day, I hope. Patrick Henry College has an excellent one.

      Delete
  6. Mike, the best I can say is that I try to "read the labels" aka, primary source documents, before I believe anything from commentary. On the spiritual level that means (to me at least) if you haven't read the Bible yourself all the way through IN ORDER with some kind of mature understanding, then you are at huge risk for accepting faulty preaching of the Gospel. There are plenty of 'feel-good' preaching going on, which is really the last thing anyone needs right now when their eternal soul is at stake. Some of these churches may have thousands sitting there with great music and an awesome light show, and yet never hear about the Gospel and salvation, that they are sinners (no matter what, we all are) and they don't deserve God's grace, but they can have it for the asking. Sure wouldn't want to hurt anyone's feelings, now would we? So, the Gospel gets Reconstructed.

    If you want to know the truth about a news event and you are only watching tv news or listening NPR/PureBS, then chances are you are at risk for being duped by errors of commission and omission-- you have to do some independent research on your own. All secondary sources have a POV, or worst yet, an agenda-- I have been burned before believing something due my own emotional baggage that overrode my rational intellect keeping me from checking it out before I chomped the hook. It takes so much time, but I have decided that if I am going to have an opinion about something, I better be able to back it up (and be willing to change if compelling information comes to light). Beware of Reconstructed News events.

    How something is packaged counts for something, too, and that seems to dupe people even more - or scares them off from ever hearing the good stuff. If the piece I am reading is critical of the "messenger" only and fails to address the message, then I don't see the value, even and especially if it is someone "on our side." Beware of Reconstructed Messengers.

    There is a lot of Reconstruction going on in the body politic and supporting institutions. That is frightening to me because people don't know enough to realize they are being hoodwinked until it is too late. Most of them won't even listen or question because it is too "hard" and time consuming, even at their own peril. Ignorant people now have a dangerous effect on all of us due to the horrific overreach of our Govt. I am talking about all the dingbats who voted for Obama (and I know a lot of them) who aren't hard-core Lefties - They are just LAZY.

    People older and wiser than me are amazed at how quickly everything seems to be tanking and that they have never seen anything like it, even though they lived through the Depression and WW2. That's something to ponder - it really is as bad as we think it is... probably worse... and most of it is quite intentional by the Powers That Be, IMHO.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Phew Sioux, you said more than me! ;)
    I don't disagree with anything you say except the religion part. I firmly believe in predestination, although I also believe in free will. Therefore I do not believe one chooses salvation, but rather salvation has already chosen them. (Better stated as God chose His Elect.) This answers far more things than believing one has the free will to chose. Much more complex although it would opposite.

    As for the politics part and the lack of knowledge. It came from several reasons, but mainly it is due to the fact that many people NEVER should be allowed the vote. Only those people who have proven themselves to be good stewards, knowledgeable, intelligent and prospers enuff to show they have accumulated a little something of value in life should be allowed the vote. It would be amazing how many problems this would solve. Actually this is similar as to how the Bolsheviks conquered Russia and surrounding countries. There was a wealthy class of people with good educations that wanted to create an oligarchy. They accomplished by the help of money from their extended family of International bankers. They them took this money and raised armies from the very lowest and poorest class of Russians and such peasants from those surrounding countries. Those peasants would follow anyone who promised them anything more than what they already had. And very similar has happened in the usa in that a wealthy class of people has bought the votes of the lowest and poorest classes of people to simply out vote the average workers. (The war to accomplish this task was fought in 1861-65.) This has been continually extended ever since in order to maintain that voter advantage to keep the status quo, the oligarchy intact. So what we see is nothing new but as you say, it is how it is repackaged and presented.

    Sadly it is too late to even begin to stop this. Another war WILL be fought to determine the future of not only the usa but the entire world.

    Western Civilization is now dead! Long live the Khazarian Civilization, which what I also call the Krazy Civilization. If this upcoming civilization is not stopped before it matures, the whole world will be under its' domination for as long as I can see...

    A little more about me...(Please don't hold me accountable for my grammar and typing... as I type too much and fast, answering too many posts)

    Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur
    Classical Historian Western Civilization

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey there Sioux,
    As for the religion; Don't sweat the petty stuff, but do pet the sweaty stuff.
    My understanding is, the specifics of the tenets everyone is so quick to argue over, is a non-issue. This is because I can't save or change anyone concerning anything. I can't even save myself. As a predestinist I already either am or am not. I can judge anything about another except their salvation. That means I can disagree with another person but I cannot outrightly condemn them for minor differences of doctoral opinions. OTOH at some point it become apparent if a person is not a Christian or Catholic, then you can speak more vocally against what they claim but it still not our domain to judge that person's salvation. Although that too becomes readily apparent considering many people. Believe what you will, I am not concerned over it as you've already demonstrated enuff for me to give you plenty of consideration as being one of your honor and integrity. I look at your personal beliefs in such areas as free will as it being what was meant for you to understand. If your heart is right, what you believe in your head don't count for much of anything. It's just a matter of what one was meant to understand...

    I 100% agree on the Globalists.
    I did mean Khazars and Khazarians. Those people are actually the false Jews. Jews who claim to be Jews but are not. Rev 2:9 and 3:9. They are also the people who loves money and they have come to dominate the world by their love of money. I have a rather long treatise/essay on the whole thing. Must be rather good too, from my feedback. They are also the ones SOLELY responsible for the war in the Ukraine. They also despise and hate Russians, all Russians who won't deal with money with them. .

    Oh man; why do you do this to me?
    I've thought back on this episode more times than I can count.
    Burgess Meredith in "The Obsolete Man".
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZymJAsxHbVg

    Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur

    ReplyDelete
  9. I forgot. It just dawned on me after submitting my post...
    You mite not have ever heard of the Khazars... I would have posted some of this stuff here much earlier but I don't think Brock cares much for it. And I am still omitting the finer details for the readers to find out about for themselves. Personally I think ALL topics concerning anything except x-rated filth should be allowed as free speech in order that the truth be analyzed, hashed out, critiqued and compared to anything tested against it in order to fully determine what the truth really is in any case where there is doubt and contention.

    Go to the below link and read about them. (2 Parts) I had already concluded much of this by the time I first read this link. Much of the same, and much more appears in my treatise/essay.
    http://www.apfn.org/THEWINDS/library/khazars.html

    While you are at it, this is the best timeline on them I have ever witnessed: It is very encompassing. One entry shows their indirect connection to Lincoln and how they wanted the war.
    http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild_ori.htm

    and here is a video, but it is very long. The best I have found so far in videos:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-klNO-AjW6M&sns=fb

    I have studied this stuff for over 30 years... and this is just one small part of my studies.. While ya'll played, worked and loved, I studied... I had no choice.

    Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur
    Classical Historian Western Civilization

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While ya'll played, worked and loved, I studied.

      ==============

      Exactly what I was referring to before. You need to heed the good General's advice:


      A true man of Honor feels humble himself when he cannot help humbling others.

      My chief concern is to try to be an humble, earnest Christian.

      Delete
  10. Exactly!
    I can see your POV since you mentioned it, but my statement was actually intended to mean that I have put most of my life, from young to old, into studying the history, philosophy and theology that I now see people arguing over every day, or just don't have a clue. We shouldn't be so fast to criticize others unless one has a very solid basis upon which to establish any criticism. Not that any of you was criticizing either, but when one reads my writings, if they are not already familiar with at least some of the basic concepts from which I speak, they will think I am really off into left field or even out of the ballpark. If anyone ever has doubts to what I may have written, then just politely ask and you shall receive. (That is real teaching. And I will either submit you another question for you to study for an answer, or I will give a direct response.)

    I am saying these things because I thought that you, Brock, actually used the comments section as a general comments section and not as a teaching ground/tool. So I have not been one to post educational comments and articles. I understood you to use the comments section for general comments on whatever the topic concerned, and a lot are very good of which I have passed on many of your articles. However once in awhile you post a guy that I know is not completely the genuine person he appears. I just say my thoughts as I originally posted above and usually that is it. And of course there are people who invariably think; where is this guy coming from? (Although I can make mistakes and read something the wrong way as I did once before, and from a person I wasn't previously knowledgeable about. So I walk into my own traps every few blue moons.) Ya'll have to keep me on my toes and in practice.

    Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur

    ReplyDelete
  11. Mike -I will take a look at your links tomorrow - thanks for putting all of this out there. I am familiar with the people you are talking about (Khazars), only I think of them as the cultural Jews by birth who are at war with God - He is their enemy - Karl Marx comes to mind as an example of such scary people. Have you ever heard of Henry Makow, a Canadian - he converted to Christianity awhile back, but was a Jew, and believes fervently in the destruction wreaked by the Khazars (he calls them the Illuminati). It's hard to believe that so few people can accomplish such evil, but they have many foot soldiers in the universities, entertainment/cultural activities, and govt. bureaucracies. So, I am glad that we have dedicated scholars such as yourself who delve into this and connect dots. Some of it does sound wacko, but that doesn't make it untrue.

    BTW- I remember that Twilight Zone episode very well (thank goodness they do a lot of reruns on SciFi channel for the young'uns to watch). And in the end, Burgess outsmarted the Man .... who would want to live in such a world any how??? I fear no Evil, I fear not Death, for Thou art with me. On that note, I will take my humble self to bed so I can be semi-sharp tomorrow ;)

    ReplyDelete