Jim Crow sharecroppers experienced the pernicious substitute for slavery: ‘Well, if we can’t own you, we have to pay you something, it won’t be very much, but we’re going to own every other aspect of you.
(The Flimflam man conveniently leaves out white sharecroppers and he, as well as other 'experts', refuse to debate as they know full well they will go down in flames)
there was no law that protected African Americans in slavery(An unmitigated lie as my g, g, grandfather won the first case in 1834.)
pointing squarely at the South Carolina articles of secession: “Is there the words ‘states’ rights’ in their articles of secession?(Yes, Einstein, but try reading the many other articles of secession. Typical, liberal cherry picks what he likes and omits what he doesn't.)
More nonsense @ The Washington Post