Thursday, October 29, 2015

“The war is actually begun.

Via avordvet

 
 The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have?”

–Patrick Henry


 Randy Weaver was a white separatist, a racist and a radical whose views were unpalatable to general society. In fact, most patriots would not have wanted to associate with him and his family. Their views were strange, and some of the people they associated with were even more unsavory in their views than the Weavers were. Patriots may not understand how someone who claimed to believe in liberty could honestly believe that one race is somehow better than another. One thing that patriots do understand, however, is that regardless of what Weaver’s beliefs were, he had the right to live in peace, and he did not deserve to have his son shot in the back or his wife’s head blown off on his own land at Ruby Ridge. Randy Weaver had the right to self-defense, and the government was wrong. Twenty-three years later, the horror of his story has not waned…and never will.

4 comments:

  1. It's not coming from the North. It's coming from the Democrats and Progressives. Look around you in the South, who surrounds you? It's the same up in the North. You should not use Obama's tactics of division, you should be encouraging Americas, regardless of their geographical location,to band together to fight the Government.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You should not use Obama's tactics of division

      I didn't get that from the article.

      Delete
  2. Can someone please help me understand why Whites feel compelled to adhere to communist doctrine regarding "racism?" The noted communist Leon Trotsky is credited with it's invention and the fact it is now accepted as some type of perverse fact is a bit troubling. It is a least as bad and harmful as Darwin's mathematically discredited nations of evolution.

    The author's assurance that Mr. Weaver is a racist and he would never have anything to do with him can only be described as a product of another harmful invention, that of "White guild." And can someone point me a place where Mr. Weaver EVER suggested he wanted to oppress blacks? After all that was the original definition of "racism" as opposed the it's more recent incarnation which amounts slander hammer used to silence and oppress those at whom it is flung. If Mr. Weaver made such statements of desired oppression I must have missed it or has a simple desire to live in peace with one's family and people now to be considered somehow abhorrent?

    If we continue to deny what God's hand has created and separated, denying the natural affinity and affection for our own kith, kin, and nation, we are indeed doomed. One should NOT accept the premise that a personal preference for one's people is somehow unnatural or sinful for if we refuse to look after our own who will? After all how are we and our children faring since we started spending more time looking after other's posterity as opposed to our own posterity?

    Average Joe

    ReplyDelete