Sunday, September 4, 2016

Confirmed: Rupert Murdoch Instructed Fox News To Take Down Donald Trump August 2015…

Via comment by Sioux on Stuart Varney Demands On-Air Apology From ObamaCar...

 Rubio debate 2 

*Updated to add some additional emphasis on the scope of so-called “conservative media”, and financial corruption.

In an extensive article within New York Magazine, mostly outlining the rather sordid details of Roger Ailes, readers may also note specific confirmation of something we outlined in August of last year (2015). Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch instructed Fox News executives to take down Donald Trump.


(NY MAG) […] Murdoch was not a fan of Trump’s and especially did not like his stance on immigration. (The antipathy was mutual: “Murdoch’s been very bad to me,” Trump told me in March.) A few days before the first GOP debate on Fox in August 2015, Murdoch called Ailes at home. “This has gone on long enough,” Murdoch said, according to a person briefed on the conversation. 
Murdoch told Ailes he wanted Fox’s debate moderators — Kelly, Bret Baier, and Chris Wallace — to hammer Trump on a variety of issues. Ailes, understanding the GOP electorate better than most at that point, likely thought it was a bad idea. “Donald Trump is going to be the Republican nominee,” Ailes told a colleague around this time. But he didn’t fight Murdoch on the debate directive.

On the night of August 6, in front of 24 million people, the Fox moderators peppered Trump with harder-hitting questions. But it was Kelly’s question regarding Trump’s history of crude comments about women that created a media sensation. He seemed personally wounded by her suggestion that this spoke to a temperament that might not be suited for the presidency.

“I’ve been very nice to you, though I could probably maybe not be based on the way you have treated me,” he said pointedly. (read more)  


  1. How's that working out for them, now?

    1. :) They must be extremely nervous now and guaranteed they will do anything in the world including murder to win, so we better watch our P's and Q's.

  2. Knowing that the FBI/DOJ refuse to prosecute Clinton for self-admitted violation of federal law - where part of the penalty for doing so is being unable to ever hold a public office again - it is obvious that she will never be investigated by this administration for any of her crimes, including murder (four deaths in less than a month recently) and treason.

    Does anyone think she would be investigated, let alone charged, with using her knowledge of Obama's crimes and perversions to be appointed as the next president no matter how we all vote? If an ineligible, gay, communist-trained incompetent could be elected - twice - while continuing to refuse to allow anyone to see any of his records, how big a stretch to think the Left can simply ignore the votes of the citizens of this country and declare Clinton the winner, pretending to have counted the votes propely, and denying any voter/election fraud at all? Simply calling the Republican Party sore losers who were trying to drag her down with another conspiracy theory like the email debacle.

    I sincerely hope I am wrong, and that Trump gets elected instead if this evil, venal, psychopathic, drug- and mind-controlled bwitch. But I won't be holding my breath.

  3. Fox is run by globalist and Trump is their natural enemy, no real surprise.

    Average Joe