Sunday, May 14, 2017

Appeals Court hearing of Travel Ban: ‘If Clinton had ordered it, it would have been legal’

Via David



Apparently the most egregious part of the Trump so called “travel ban” otherwise known as “extreme vetting” is his thought crimes. If Hillary Clinton had written the order it would have been constitutional so goes the ACLU attorney before the Appeals court. It was brought up yesterday at the Yates Clapper hearing as well, that it wasn’t the Executive Order that constituted illegality, but rather Trump’s “thoughts” behind it.

More @ Bunkerville

2 comments:

  1. According to Article VI, Section 2 , judges are limited to only the wording of the law by which they "shall be bound thereby". Adding other extraneous matters are "erroneous biases" in the words of Jefferson which make for despotic rulings which destroy the Republic. --Ron W

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Adding other extraneous matters are "erroneous biases" in the words of Jefferson

      A giant among men.

      Delete