MAD magazine article...?
The Western District Court of Appeals ruled in her favor Tuesday, writing that her constitutional challenge — rare for its basis in religion — presented “a contested matter of right that involves fair doubt and reasonable room for disagreement.”
The woman, identified as Mary Doe in court documents, argued that her religion does not adhere to the idea that life begins at conception, and, because of that, the prerequisites for an abortion in Missouri are unconstitutionally violating her freedom of religion protected by the First Amendment.
More @ The Kansas City Star
Easy enough to shoot down.....some 'religions' believe that human sacrifice is not murder but instead a valid religious belief and should be protected and allowed. Same premise. A COMPETENT court.....hard to find these days....will quickly put this issue to rest.
ReplyDeletesome 'religions' believe that human sacrifice is not murder but instead a valid religious belief and should be protected and allowed. Same premise.
DeleteGood point.
The law was made to serve man, not enslave him.
DeleteYou'd think.....Excellent reply and thanks.
Delete