Sowell is one of the most astute commentators on politics, society and America. His acknowledgement that the odds of America lasting as it was intended is minimal is very telling.
I agree Dan, now all that needs to be done is to stop the Socialist supporting African-American politicians from labeling him an "Uncle Tom".
The left has been denigrating and castigating Mr. Sowell for YEARS....not that he cares what they think.
not that he cares what they think.Precisely.
Thomas Sowell is Right as Rain.
Both he and Walter Williams.
Walter Williams is a brilliant thinker and writer. He knows and writes the real truth about one of America's political gods, Lincoln. --Ron W
My favorite quote of his is something like 'if you hear that Walter Williams doesn't have any guns, you will know that Walter Williams is dead' ! :)
Yep! I think it's, "if you ever hear that they've taken Williams' guns, you will know that Williams is dead." He knows that disarming people and keeping them that way has always been the historical basis of slavery. Furthermore, anyone who wants you disarmed, other than pacifist "useful idiots", wants you dead. --Ron W
Here's Walter Williams on "the Civil War" and Lincoln. --Ron W:We call the war of 1861 the Civil War. But is that right? A civil war is a struggle between two or more entities trying to take over the central government. Confederate President Jefferson Davis no more sought to take over Washington, D.C., than George Washington sought to take over London in 1776. Both wars, those of 1776 and 1861, were wars of independence. Such a recognition does not require one to sanction the horrors of slavery. We might ask, How much of the war was about slavery?Was President Abraham Lincoln really for outlawing slavery? Let's look at his words. In an 1858 letter, Lincoln said, "I have declared a thousand times, and now repeat that, in my opinion neither the General Government, nor any other power outside of the slave states, can constitutionally or rightfully interfere with slaves or slavery where it already exists." In a Springfield, Illinois, speech, he explained: "My declarations upon this subject of Negro slavery may be misrepresented but cannot be misunderstood. I have said that I do not understand the Declaration (of Independence) to mean that all men were created equal in all respects." Debating Sen. Stephen Douglas, Lincoln said, "I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes nor of qualifying them to hold office nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races, which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality.""What about Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation? Here are his words: "I view the matter (of slaves' emancipation) as a practical war measure, to be decided upon according to the advantages or disadvantages it may offer to the suppression of the rebellion." He also wrote: "I will also concede that emancipation would help us in Europe, and convince them that we are incited by something more than ambition." When Lincoln first drafted the proclamation, war was going badly for the Union. London and Paris were considering recognizing the Confederacy and assisting it in its war against the Union.The Emancipation Proclamation was not a universal declaration. It specifically detailed where slaves were to be freed: only in those states "in rebellion against the United States." Slaves remained slaves in states not in rebellion — such as Kentucky, Maryland, Delaware and Missouri. The hypocrisy of the Emancipation Proclamation came in for heavy criticism. Lincoln's own secretary of state, William Seward, sarcastically said, "We show our sympathy with slavery by emancipating slaves where we cannot reach them and holding them in bondage where we can set them free."Lincoln did articulate a view of secession that would have been heartily endorsed by the Confederacy: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one that suits them better. ... Nor is this right confined to cases in which the whole people of an existing government may choose to exercise it. Any portion of such people that can may revolutionize and make their own of so much of the territory as they inhabit." Lincoln expressed that view in an 1848 speech in the U.S. House of Representatives, supporting the secession of Texas from Mexico.Why didn't Lincoln share the same feelings about Southern secession? Following the money might help with an answer. Throughout most of our nation's history, the only sources of federal revenue were excise taxes and tariffs. During the 1850s, tariffs amounted to 90 percent of federal revenue. Southern ports paid 75 percent of tariffs in 1859. What "responsible" politician would let that much revenue go?"
Thanks and:23. " Tarif" When the Saracens and Moors, in the 8th century invaded and devastated the rich and beautiful provinces of Spain, they were commanded by a general whose name was Tarif, who had but one eye (See Anquetil's Universal History) - Our Tariff must be a descendant of this infamous destroyer, and inherits his defect of having but one eye, as it can see but one interest, and in one direction." (I found the above quote on microfilm at the Tarboro Library, but I either failed to write down the source, or there was none. Also, I failed to write down the date, but remember that it was well before the War, 1823/1833 sticks in my mind. BT) http://namsouth.com/viewtopic.php?t=75&highlight=tarif&:My G, G Grandfather - Tariff Must Be Reducedhttp://namsouth.com/viewtopic.php?t=52&highlight=pippenExcerptThe Tariff must be reduced; it was grinding the South to powder. The northern manufacturers were declaring dividends of 25 and 30 per cent per annum, while the poor farmer at the South could scarcely "make both ends meet." The Tariff must be reduced - it made the rich richer and the poor poorer.
Brock, thanks. One thing for sure, most people who have been schooled in our public schools, probably private too and so-called "institutions of higher learning" have a very poor grasp of real history. I suspect the things about which Dr. Williams wrote, even if known, are intentionally omitted. Too bad, for if our people knew actual history I think there would be much more tolerance and peace among people now, especially for the monuments and symbols of Confederate history. As it has been said, "history proves that we learn nothing from history." Furthermore, as Mark Twain wrote, "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." Thanks to you, Sir and "FreeNorthCarolina" for being an excellent source of continuing education. --Ron W
I think there would be much more tolerance and peace among people now, especially for the monuments and symbols of Confederate history. Excellent point and I thank you for your excellent input here!