Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke doubled down on his plans for a so-called “mandatory buyback” of certain firearms in an interview Thursday night amid criticisms of his gun proposal.
“If we’re able to pass mandatory buyback and I’m able to sign that into law, then I fully expect our fellow Americans to turn in their AR-15s and their AK-47s,” he told CBS News.
“For anyone who does not and is caught in possession or seen in possession of one of these weapons of war or these instruments of terror, that weapon will be taken from them and they will be fined, and if they should persist in continuing to use and to buy these weapons, then there will be other consequences in the criminal code.”
More @ WJ
"Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument." --Chief Justice, John Marshall, Marbury vs. Madison, 1803
ReplyDeleteThese politicians who accuse the President of a supposed crime in a phone call to foreign leader, are openly calling for criminal violence against Americans exercising their Constitutional rights. Beto O'Rourke, and others who propose such legislative tyranny to enable government criminality, are seditionists. That's a crime! --Ron W
John Marshall trumps O'Rourke :) and by the way I grew up in Marshall, VA which was named for the chief justice whose home is outside the city limits.
Deletehttp://www.namsouth.com/viewtopic.php?t=4247&highlight=john+marshall
It seems that most federal jurists appeal to precedent, often even more than the actual wording of the Constitution. Well there it is: "a law repugnant to the Constitution is void"! EVERYTHING Beto proposes is VOID because it violates "shall not be infringed" which is very strong language because the fedgov has NO delegated powers for any gun laws pertaining to the People or "a free State" ! Not only are his rantings violations of the 2nd, 4th and 5th they also violate the 10th because they fedgov may do NOTHING without enumerated delegated powers! --Ron W
Delete
ReplyDeleteIn your dreams, fucker.
:):):):):):)
Delete