Saturday, November 20, 2021

Kyle & Lindell

Via Red Phillips

15 comments:

  1. Right on.
    Maybe it's time I finally buy a My Pillow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I got some a while back... they're ok... I do like the fact you can wash them in your machine. The 'free' travel sized pillow is what I use the most!

      Delete
    2. you can wash them in your machine.

      Never heard of that and thanks.

      Delete
  2. The measure of a man is that he walks the walk. Michael J. Lindell has shown who he is.

    How is that bail not excessive and a violation of Kyle Rittenhouse's civil rights protected under the Eighth Amendment?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary should include that photo at the definition of the word patriot.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I hope Lindell was refunded his bail money when Kyle was acquitted. Bail is not "paid," it's posted -- and is only a guaranty that the accused will return to stand trial. If Lindell didn't get it back on the instant, the government of Wisconsin owes him big time.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It seems various people contributed to Rittenhouse's bail now
    the fight is on for the money. It all comes back to the money:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10225167/Kyle-Rittenhouses-legal-fight-Ex-lawyers-want-2million-bond-money.html#comments

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bond money raised because the defendant can't raise it themselves or get it guaranteed from a bondsman, is returned to whoever raises it. That's the law, as seamy as it is. Kind of a charity racket

      Isn't this correct?

      Delete
    2. Thanks.https://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2021/11/kyle-rittenhouses-next-legal-fight-teen.html

      Delete
    3. Yes, it is a charity. He's lucky people cared enough to
      donate money for his release or he could have rotted in
      jail and taken chances on his very survival. If I had
      donated a few thousand to the cause, I would want my money
      back. I'm sure all the donations are well documented.
      The money is not for him to enjoy, it was for his compassionate release. What I understand, he nor his
      family have no financial stake in the money.

      Delete
    4. What I understand, he nor his
      family have no financial stake in the money.

      Same here, I guess there is misinformation in the article.

      Delete