Saturday, January 29, 2022

Ben Carson Slams Biden’s Race-Based Supreme Court Pledge as ‘Abominable’ Identity Politics

Ben Carson Slams Biden’s Race-Based Supreme Court Pledge as ‘Abominable’ Identity Politics

President Joe Biden recommitted this week to nominate the first black woman to serve on the Supreme Court, claiming that it was “time” for that to happen and that black women everywhere in America deserved representation on the high court. The announcement was praised by the Left, but Dr. Ben Carson slammed the pledge as “abominable” and the latest evidence that identity politics are moving the United States away from its fundamental values such as equality.

More @ RTM

6 comments:

  1. I was hoping for a White Confederate or an Appalachian for
    the soon to be vacant seat. Blacks are fifteen percent of the
    population, I guess, unless the numbers are subverted, so I
    don't see how another black is merited. Thank God, Clarence
    Thomas is Clarence Thomas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank God, Clarence Thomas is Clarence Thomas.

      Amen.

      Delete
    2. I'll second that AMEN!!!
      I like thie idea, we need to borrow a play from the democratic play book: steal their idea, make it our own, run hard and fast and shout down anyone who disagrees.

      CANDACE OWENS FOR SUPREME COURT!
      CANDACE OWENS FOR SUPREME COURT!
      CANDACE OWENS FOR SUPREME COURT!

      She's black, and a woman, so if you don't like her you're a sexist bigot!

      Delete
  2. The disparity in percentages is where whyte pee-po need to attack this scourge.
    9 judges sit on the bench, 1 is a black male, ergo 11% of that population is black. If 2 blacks are on the bench, thats 22%.
    Census numbers tell us 15% of the US is black.

    15 - 11 = 4
    22 - 15 = 7

    We are closer to actual population representation with 1 black justice on the bench than with 2. Choosing 2 would be overtly racist against non-blacks, and the court would not be a reflection of their values.
    ... Only problem with that argument is it can be used to expand the number of judges as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ... Only problem with that argument is it can be used to expand the number of judges as well.

      Precisely! :(

      Delete