VERBATIM
China, Russia, and Vietnam all received more votes than France or
Britain for membership on the United Nations Human Rights Council — and
Cuba got the most votes among Latin American countries.
"This is a black day for human rights," declared
Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch, a Geneva-based human
rights group, following the vote on Tuesday.
"Despite the much-vaunted 2006 reform, which
scrapped the discredited Human Rights Commission and created a new and
supposedly improved council, today's election of the world's worst human
rights abusers means that we are back to square one. Instead of reform,
we have regression."
The HRC is supposedly "responsible for
strengthening the promotion and protection of human rights around the
globe and for addressing situations of human rights violations,"
according to the U.N.
But the election of China to the council "calls
into question the council's credibility," said Britain's Edward
McMillan-Scott, a vice president of the European Council, in comments
reported by CNS News.
"Numerous reports by the U.N. itself have
highlighted degrading and inhumane treatment that is routine in China:
forcible abortions, religious persecution, the oppression of minorities,
etc."
Of the 14 countries elected to a three-year term
on the 47-member group this year, six are designated as "not free" by
Freedom Watch, a Washington-based watchdog organization that grades
nations according to their record on political rights and civil
liberties: Saudi Arabia and Algeria in addition to China, Russia,
Vietnam, and Cuba.
A simple majority of the General Assembly's 193
members is required to win a seat, but election is limited to a set
number of members from each of five regions.
Two seats on the council were available for Latin
American nations. In secret balloting, Cuba got 148 votes, more than
two democracies: Mexico (135) and Uruguay (93).
Vietnam got 184 votes and China and Russia each received 176, while France got 174 and Britain 171.
Next year's council will have 24 "free," 12 "partly free," and 11 "not free" member nations.
During negotiations in 2005-6 to set up the new
council, the United States proposed that countries subjected to U.N.
Security Council sanctions for human rights abuses or terrorism should
be barred from membership. The proposal was defeated.
"The prospect of rights-violating regimes joining
the HRC — and then using it to protect each other — was a major reason
for the decision by the Bush administration to shun the council, a
decision reversed by its successor in 2009," CNS News reported.
After Tuesday's vote, the State Department
expressed "regret that some countries elected to the Human Rights
Council have failed to show their commitment to the promotion and
protection of human rights."
In July 2013, envoys from both Syria and Iran announced that they would attempt to run for an HRC seat in 2014.