It is settled science, that intelligence varies among the races; demonstrable and repetitively shown over years and by several credible researchers. It is also settled that intelligence varies among individuals. So it must be taken that, if Asians generally top the charts, there will be among them, a dim bulb or two. Is that a 'racist' conclusion?
At the other end of the spectrum, Blacks generally bottom out the charts, there will be among them an incandescent mind glorious to behold. For every genius, fifteen or twenty thousand dim bulbs.
Is that a 'racist' conclusion.
If Asians in general earn more, live better, and produce value, more so than Blacks, is that also a 'racist' conclusion?
It is historically proven that young Black males commit crimes at a rate far in excess of their numbers would justify.
It is also historically correct to state that crime rates among young Asian males are infinitesimal. Both are facts, which is 'racist'?
It has been a basic tenet of Communism (AKA Progressive) doctrine, that man is perfectible and will ultimately attain that apogee under Communist ministrations. Some Christians share the same ideal.
Others, accept that man is a flawed creature and, left to his won devices, would eat his shoes and befoul the bath water. For some, we must smile, be nice, benevolent, uncritical, and generally vapid and boring; others know it's a daily battle, down in the mud and blood, and only with Divine intervention, do we rise again, to begin all over again the next day. For some God is a remote
figure in Corporate Finance, clicking His abacus; for the rest of us, He's on the edge of the crowd, holding our coat, and shouting encouragement. Perhaps with a cudgel behind his back.
And lastly, a note to Greta . . . Joan of Arc was the last teen aged girl who mattered in the world.
Honey, you ain't she.
~~4Branch
