His Holiness on Lincoln & Company

Diplomat Ambrose Dudley Mann was sent to Europe in March of 1861 to promote the interests, independence and peaceful intentions of the American Confederacy, eventually being appointed Confederate Commissioner for Belgium and the Vatican. His audience with Pope Pius IX is related below in a report to Confederate Secretary of State Judah P. Benjamin.

Bernhard Thuersam, Chairman
North Carolina War Between the States Sesquicentennial Commission
www.ncwbts150.com
"The Official Website of the North Carolina WBTS Sesquicentennial"
========
His Holiness on Lincoln & Company:

“From Mr. Mann.

Received December 21, ’63. J.P.B.

Rome, November 14, 1863.

To: Hon. Judah P. Benjamin, Secretary of State of the Confederate States of America, Richmond, Va.,

Sir: At three o’clock on the afternoon of yesterday I received a formal notification that His Holiness would favor me with an audience embracing my private secretary to-day at twelve o’clock. His Holiness stated, after I had taken my stand to his side, that he had been so afflicted by the horrors of the war in America than many months ago he had written to the Archbishops of New Orleans and New York to use all the influence that they could properly employ for terminating with as little delay as possible the deplorable state of hostilities; that from the former he had received no answer, but that he had heard from the latter, and his communication was not such as to inspire hopes that his ardent wishes could be speedily gratified.

At length His Holiness asked whether President Davis were a Catholic. I answered in the negative. He then asked if I were one. I answered that I was not. His Holiness now stated, to use his own language, that Lincoln and Company had endeavored to create an impression abroad that they were fighting for the abolition of slavery, and that it might perhaps be judicious in us to consent to gradual emancipation.

I replied that the subject of slavery was one over which the Government of the Confederate States, like that of the old United States, had no control whatever; that all ameliorations with regard to the institution must proceed from the States themselves, which were sovereign in their character in this regard as were France, Austria, or any other Continental power; that true philanthropy shuddered at the liberation of the slave in the manner attempted by Lincoln and Company…that if, indeed, African slavery were an evil, there was a power which in its own good time would doubtless remove that evil in a more gentle manner than that of causing the earth to be deluged with blood for its sudden overthrow.

His Holiness received these remarks with an approving expression. He then said I have reason to be proud of the self-sacrificing devotion of my countrymen, from the beginning, to the cause for which they were contending.

I [informed] His Holiness that it was not the armies of Northern birth which the South was encountering in hostile array, but that it was the armies of European creation, occasioned by Irish and Germans, chiefly by the former, who were influenced to emigrate (by circulars from Lincoln and Company to their numerous agents abroad) ostensibly for the purpose of securing high wages, but in reality to fill up the constantly depleted ranks of our enemy, that those poor unfortunates were tempted by high bounties amounting to $500, $600, and $700 to enlist and take up arms against us, that once in the service they were invariably placed in the most exposed points of danger in the battlefield… that but for foreign recruits the North would most likely have broken down months ago in the absurd attempt to overpower the South. His Holiness expressed his utter astonishment, repeatedly throwing up his hands at the employment of such means against us and the cruelty attendant upon such unscrupulous operations.” A. Dudley Mann

(Messages and Papers of the Confederacy, Including the Diplomatic Correspondence, Vol. II, James D. Richardson, US Publishing Company, 1905, pp. 591-594)
========
His Holiness on Lincoln & Company

VETERANS TODAY: Censoring History – From Robert E. Lee to LBJ and MLK

Via Steve

Sons of Confederate Veterans

Confederate descendants have long dealt with the misperception that their main goal motivation for honoring their ancestors is to create a facade to hide their guilt behind.

Guilt tripping is a tried and true manipulation tactic, and one not practiced by nice people, but of the ruder more devious element. Their motivation is generally a political hustle.

Gregg Clemmer’s article below features three examples of a more personal nature, the struggle between families and historians, Lee, LBJ and MJk. To reveal, or not to reveal…that is the devil they deal with, not the smearmiesters that torment Confederates.

Our charge, the SCV, is to protect the good name of the Confederate soldier, honored in literally all the military academies of the world. And we do that by revealing to our American family what many relatives prefer that we not, the information that has generally been withheld because it conflicts with the propaganda story. If we have learned anything since 911, this should surprise no one.

Yet Confederates face Civil War propagandists similar to those that would claim the 911 commission report is the true story on the event and all those who disagree are just America haters. The War Between the States has a many parallels with 911…the staging, the attack, and post event. And if there is any group of readers that can grasp this, it is Veterans Today’s. I will be stepping through this in future articles.

I picked Gregg Clemmer’s article for today’s Sesquicentennial series piece because it was a great example of the universal struggle by competing forces to mold history to their vision of the truth, or the one they prefer. The concept of reconciliation is often a major casualty here.

The Centennial Civil War celebration, to use that word, was an intended celebration of reconciliation by national leaders. But various and competing political and social agendas turned the event into a minefield of sorts. Confederate bashing had not come into vogue yet during the Centennial. Back then…

Many black folks were Lincoln Republicans. And southern Democrats so loved to vote that even the dead showed up on election day. South bashing was not considered a political benefit by either party at the time.

What today’s South bashers miscalculated was family pride in the South. I do not say that all have it. Martin Luther King’s children are examples of ‘pride impaired’ legacies, and they do not walk alone.

To Honor or Dishonor - Who Decides?

To malign a person’s family is still a major insult in the South, and those who do it are not considered enlightened superiors, but quite the contrary. In fact, you can get killed doing this in some parts down here where it is considered a form of suicide.

The word Yankee, the derogatory version of it used in the South, is not really a smear word, but simply a descriptive one of such a person. It is a term that is earned by the recipients through their behavior. Being from ‘up North’ is another planet compared a with ‘Yankee’.

American, Confederate and family pride are all closely entwined. Countries, peoples and families all have their crown jewels and family secrets. Guests are not entertained in the basement but the living room. And it is remains impolite to ask if someone still uses an outhouse.

When American tourists visit European historic battlefields they do not find slavery exhibits or fake gas chambers.

In Rome there are no marches for slavery reparations or sit in fundraisers at the Coliseum. Liberal Italians don’t demand their tourist business be closed down for glorifying Roman slavery. That political guilt trip is an American creation.

When Americans visit the Tower of London and tour all the room displays and instruments of torture, they are not handed leaflets on the street on support for victim reparations.

When I lived in Barbados where citizens were 96% black, the concept of reparations was beyond the pale.

Why the repetitive mentions of slavery you ask? It is because we already know that some are planning to carjack the 150th to run their slavery guilt trip machine for five years in the Sesqui storefront window. By the way, I fully support freeing all the remaining slaves here.

King Kamehameha Drives Enemy Warriors off Cliffs

Native Hawaiians do not hold a day of remembrance for their years of genociding their neighbors, dispatched by the ancestors of the current natives.

American Indians do not mourn their recorded history of slaughtering their neighbors, enslaving the children (if they were lucky) or torturing them to death using methods which could not even be put into print at the time.

It is my wish, and maybe a naive one, that maybe the Sesquicentennial can be put to good use putting the guilt tripping implements of torture away. Such things do not bring us together, but just the opposite, which makes one wonder.

I caught an Al Jazeera TV show recently about the Congo being the rape capitol of the world now, with the number 50,000 annually thrown out. It has been getting steady coverage even though nobody has a clue as to a solution.

But the black on white rape epidemic here in American, about 35,000 a year and holding steady, the media will not cover. It seems they don’t like the image that would represent, that maybe there is something wrong here in paradise, like it’s possibly being the interracial rape capitol of the world. Once again, they are dismissive.

We all face life changing threats on the near horizon and we might be better served keeping our eye on the livelihood ball. But someone else, or some other group, might prefer something else…a distraction. Do they desire reconciliation, or division? Which empowers them more and which does not? I will leave it to you to guess why. And if you do…you will understand why I wrote this today.

You can catch all the past Sesquicentennial articles here. Just look for the Sesqui logo.

Jim W. Dean, VT editor & Heritage TV, Atlanta

MORE

========

Censoring History – From Robert E. Lee to LBJ and MLK

Media & Obama Template: TEA Party Conservatives Will “Become A Violent Movement”

Via Green Mountains Homesteading

=============================

Sword At-The-Ready
VERBATIM POST
==============================

I don’t care what anyone says. The demonization war on Conservatives and the TEA Party as ‘terrorists’ is an orchestration from the highest levels of the Obama regime. It’s too convenient that the media and the sycophants for Obama and his Marxist movement are all screaming the same exact thing: that Conservatives in the TEA Party and TEA Party Congressmen are “Terrorists”, “Extremists”, “Delusional” and “Will become violent”. Heck, even Chrissy “Thrill-up-my-leg” Matthews suggested yesterday that TEA Party Conservatives are “”southern” “secessionists” who want to “kill” Obama. After a pause he quickly amended, “politically.”

These charges are not by accident. They are not ‘slip-ups’ or accidental or somehow an expression of frustration. These calls are deliberate and calculated. This is now become the template set down that the media propagandists for this regime will not deviate from, even if the Democrat politicians dial down their recent demonizations. I think the Marxists are moving rapidly into their next phase of this coup. And as I have said – all Marxist revolutions require bloodshed in order to impose the rule of the iron fist. What Obama and the Marxists are doing – is setting the impression in the minds of many Americans, that Conservatives and TEA Party members are a danger to society.

History teaches that anytime the Ruling Class of a society begins to classify their targets in such manner – that pogroms are not far behind.

Newsbusters and CNS News report on the outrageous efforts of Socialist Soapbox MSNBC to carry the template Obama’s regime has laid down to castigate the TEA Party and it’s supporters as imminent threats to national security.

MSNBC trotted out psychologist Stanton Peele who then preceded to analyze the “mind of the TEA Party” and declared TEA Party conservatives to be unruly children throwing a tantrum, who are pursuing goals that never existed and are not achievable. Stanton said Conservatives are like “addicts”, “delusional” and “psychotic” and whom he says, “will become violent”.

Do we really think it a coincidence that the Democratic leadership, including the Vice President have referred to TEA Party Conservatives as “Terrorists”? I don’t. They have essentially called them enemies of the state, while the media has been running full tilt in categorizing Conservative Americans as a ‘clear and present danger’. The timing is suspicious that the Obama regime yesterday – initiated a new federal “Strategy” to counter “Domestic Terrorists” without one mention in the ‘strategy’ of Islam or Jihad terrorists? Nothing from Rep. Peter King’s (R – N.Y.) Islamic Radicalization hearings appears in this new Obama ‘Strategy’ outside of Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee’s demand that they hold hearings on “Right Wing extremists” instead of Muslims.

Obama’s new strategy calls on federal agencies to mobilize police, schools and community groups to ” identify domestic radicalism and extremism that could lead to violence”. Anyone wonder why it was that MSNBC trots out a psychologist to declare that the TEA Party will become violent?? Anyone wonder why Chris Matthews accused the TEA Party of wanting to “Kill Obama”???? Anyone really wonder why Sheila Jackson Lee demands hearings on “violent Right Wing extremists’?? The new Obama Strategy says ”government efforts to identify violent extremists BEFORE THEY ACT are underway”.

Before they act???

Well, since the Ruling class in our government and media have ’identified’ the ‘violent extremists’ as being TEA Party Conservatives, is there any question of whom this government intends to crack down on???

Let’s call this “precrime” zeitgeist by the Marxists for what it is: prepping the battlefield in the minds of Americans to accept the wholesale criminalization and eventual round-up and elimination of Obama’s political opposition. The narrative is, If you are not an Obama supporter, you are a terrorist.

Welcome to Soviet Amerika. It’s not a joke. It’s not an exaggeration. This is real. What the Ruling Class thinks of Conservative Americans is now manifest and evident. What they are charging us being, is terrorists and they are in the process of trying to validate that charge at every opportunity.

This is how millions of people ended up in mass graves by similar ideologies that mirror the President’s. And for the same cited reasons.

Hitler and his National Socialists had an insane hatred of Jews.

Stalin and his Soviet Marxists had an insane hatred of the Kulaks.

Obama and his Democrat Marxists have an insane hatred of TEA Party Conservative Americans.

The only question is – will the fate of Conservatives be the same as it was for the Jews in Germany and the Kulaks in the Ukraine?

U.S. loses triple-A credit rating from S&P

Via The Arctic Patriot

Good! Even though I will pay more interest, maybe this will get our absolutely worthless government's head out of its ass. Wait, the Marxist is doing everything on purpose.........

The Spirit of '76 was the name of a bar my friend and I were going to open in Saigon, maybe it's time for the Spirit at least.

===================================================

HERE

Quartzsite Police Chief Calls Oath Keepers and Tea Party “Terrorists” and Reports them to the FBI

Oath Keeper's Ceremony & Dinner+ 09/12/09 D.C.
=====================================================

OATHKEEPERS
VERBATIM POST

======================

Oath Keepers Response: “We’re your huckleberries, Chief!”

According to two confirmed eye witnesses, Quartzite Chief of Police Jeff Gilbert referred to the Oath Keepers, the Greater Phoenix Tea Party, and the Sons of Liberty Riders as “terrorists” during a public “coffee with the Chief” meeting on August 3, 2011. Reportedly, Chief Gilbert made the reference while discussing the upcoming August 27, 2011 rally that will be carried out by Oath Keepers, the Greater Phoenix Tea Party, and the Sons of Liberty Riders, telling the audience “”I take these terrorist threats very seriously and I have reported them to the FBI and anyone else who will listen.”

This was first reported by the Greater Phoenix Tea Party at http://phoenixteaparty.ning.com/profiles/blogs/greater-phoenix-tea-party-have

A public information request has been filed to secure the video and audio of the meeting. The Quartzite Chief of police is apparently following the playbook of the Southern Poverty Law Center, DHS, and of political elites, such as Joe Biden who recently compared the Tea Party to “terrorists.”

In response to the alleged statements of Chief Gilbert, Stewart Rhodes, Founder of Oath Keepers, said:

“If Chief Gilbert wants to label us “terrorists” simply for keeping our oaths to defend the Constitution, by using our natural right of free speech in support of good police officers who refused unlawful orders, and if he is going to label us “terrorists” for simply exercising our First Amendment protected right to peaceably assemble and petition government for a redress of grievances, – all rights that GOOD MEN fought and died to preserve - well then, all I have to say is “we’re your huckleberries” Chief. See you in Quartzsite folks! Our forefathers are watching. - Stewart Rhodes, Founder of Oath Keepers.”

The Oath Keepers are conducting a massive “Quartzsite Liberty Festival” on August 27, 2011 in support of the “Quartzsite Ten” – the oath keeping police officers who blew the whistle on Chief Gilbert for what they describe as gross violations of the rights of the people, including repeated false arrest and harassment of political opponents and abuse of the NCIC background check system to dig up dirt on political opponents and local activists. Also participating in the rally will be the Greater Phoenix Tea Party, Sons of Liberty Riders, Sons of Liberty, the Campaign for Liberty, and Arizona Ron Paul Meetup Groups, among others. See http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/08/03/oath-keepers-to-muster-quartzsite-arizona-august-27-2011/

Oath Keepers

The Budget Control Act Of 2011 Violates Constitutional Order

Via Godfather Politics

Herb Titus taught constitutional law for 26 years, concluding his academic career as founding Dean of Regent Law School. Bill Olson served in three positions in the Reagan Administration. They now practice constitutional law together, defending against government excess, at William J. Olson, P.C. They can be reached at wjo@mindspring.com or Olsonlaw@twitter.com

In a Constitutional Republic of the sort that we thought we had, the process by which laws are made is at least as important as the laws that are enacted. Our Constitution prescribes that law-making process in some detail, but those who voted for the "Budget Control Act of 2011" ("BCA 2011") were wholly unconcerned about trampling upon required constitutional processes on the way to the nirvana of "bi-partisan consensus "to avert a supposed crisis. At least two titles of the bill now being rushed through Congress are unconstitutional.

First, the "Debt Ceiling Disapproval Process" in BCA 2011 Title III unconstitutionally upends the legislative process.

The Constitution's Article I, Section 8, Clause 2 vests in Congress the power "to borrow Money on the credit of the United States." As two of America's leading constitutionalists, St. George Tucker and Joseph Story, observed, the power to borrow money is "inseparably connected" with that of "raising a revenue." Thus, from the founding of the American republic through 1917, Congress -- vested with the power "to lay and collect taxes, duties and imposts," -- kept a tight rein on borrowing, and authorized each individual debt issuance separately.

To provide more flexibility to finance the United States involvement in World War I, Congress established an aggregate limit, or ceiling, on the total amount of bonds that could be issued. This gave birth to the congressional practice of setting a limit on all federal debt. While Congress no longer approved each individual debt issuance, it determined the upper limit above which borrowing was not permitted. Thus, on February 12, 2010, Congress set a debt ceiling of $14.294 trillion, which President Obama signed into law.

However, a different approach was used when BCA 2011 was signed into law on August 2, 2011. Title III of the Act reads the "Debt Ceiling Disapproval Process." Under this title Congress has transferred to the President the power to "determine" that the debt ceiling is too low, and that further borrowing is required to meet existing commitments," subject only to congressional "disapproval." For the first time in American history the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States has been disconnected from the power to raise revenue. What St. George Tucker and Joseph Story stated were inseparable powers have now by statute been separated.

Under the new process established by this bill, if the President determines, no later than December 31, 2011, that the nation's debt is within $100 billion of the existing debt limit and that further borrowing is required to meet existing commitments, the debt limit automatically increases. The President need only to certify to Congress that he has made the required determination. Once the President acts, the Secretary of the Treasury may borrow $900 billion "subject to the enactment of a joint resolution of disapproval enacted" by Congress.

But this is not all. Title III also provides that if Congress fails to disapprove the debt ceiling increase in the amount of $900 billion, the President may again certify to Congress that he has determined that the debt subject to the new ceiling is within $100 billion and that further borrowing is required to meet existing commitments. So the Secretary of Treasury is authorized to borrow another $1.2 trillion. Indeed, the Secretary may borrow even more -- up to $1.5 trillion if a proposed balanced budget amendment has been submitted to the states for ratification. As was true of the first round of ceiling raising and borrowing, the President and Secretary of the Treasury are constrained only by the possibility of a congressional resolution of disapproval which, itself, is subject to veto by the President.

By giving the President the authority to increase the debt ceiling and to determine that borrowing is necessary to meet the nation's commitments, this bill turns the legislative process on its head. According to Article I, Section 7, before an act can become a law, it must first be passed as a bill by the House of Representatives and the Senate. Thus, any action taken to authorize the borrowing of money on the credit of the United States - whether such action is a formal bill or a vote or resolution -- must be initiated by Congress and, then, presented to the President for his veto or signature. This bill creates what it calls a "Debt Ceiling Disapproval Process" whereby the constitutional process is reversed. Instead of Congress's initiating the decision to borrow money, the President has the initiative. Congress is relegated to the role of having to disapprove the President's decision to lift the debt ceiling and authorize the Secretary of Treasury to do what the Constitution says only Congress may do -- borrow money on the credit of the United States.

Instead of constitutional order, in which Congress presents a law authorizing the borrowing of money to the President to sign or veto, the President presents to the Congress his determination that more money is to be borrowed, subject to the acquiescence or veto of Congress.

Second, the joint select committee on deficit reduction provision undermines the constitutionally established bicameral legislative process.

The Budget Control Act of 2011 establishes a joint select committee of 12 members, six from the House and six from the Senate. Three of the six House members are appointed by the Speaker of the House and three are appointed by the House minority leader. Three of the six Senate members are appointed by the majority leader and three by the leader of the minority.

Title IV of the Budget Control Act vests in that joint select committee the power to draft legislation to reduce the deficit by at least $1.5 trillion over the period of fiscal years 2012 to 2021.

Here, members of Congress yield their individual legislative duties and responsibilities to a "Super Congress" selected not by the people -- but by Republican and Democrat leaders.

How many of these Congressmen and Senators campaigned on the platform that they would be elected, get sworn in, and then obediently surrender the power their constituents vested in them to the very same Republican and Democrat leaders who have created the problems they were sent here to solve?

MORE

North Carolina League of the South Raleigh Legislative Update

Congressional Race Analysis

The historic Long Session of 2011 had the Republicans drawing the legislative lines for the first time in North Carolina’s history. The GOP decided to go for broke in their line drawing efforts to ensure control of the General Assembly, and a majority of the state’s congressional delegation for the next 10 years. A current 7-6 Democrat majority is fixing to flip to a 9-4 or potentially a 10-3 Republican advantage, and will likely remain unchanged absent a major demographic shift (I.E. amnesty) or a massive partisan realignment. Below is my personal analysis of each race, with the districts most likely to shift parties listed in descending order.

1. 13^th District - This district has undergone profound changes, as it was originally drawn by Brad Miller for Brad Miller. This district goes from a 58% Obama district to a 54% McCain district. The change is so profound that Brad Miller is leaving open the option to running in the 4^th District in a potential primary with David Price.

So far there are 4 Republicans who have announced their intentions to run for this seat: former Raleigh mayor (and nephew of Jesse Helms) Paul Coble, former federal prosecutor George Holding, 2010 nominee Bill Randall, and 2006 nominee Vernon Robinson. In terms of money and name recognition the advantage goes to Holding and Coble. Holding, whose family owns First Citizens Bank, has enormous financial potential, and has announced that Carter Wrenn will be running his campaign. Paul Coble has announced his intention to raise $1.5 million for the primary. This has the potential to be the most expensive Republican congressional primary in the South, and interesting to watch.

2. 11^th District - Heath Shuler’s Blue Dog status is fixing to go the way of Old Yeller in what is now the most Republican district in the state. Where McCain had only won by 52% in the original district, the newly approved lines would have seen McCain take 58% of the vote thanks to the city of Asheville being removed from the district. Considering that Shuler had to spend $2 million to keep his seat in 2010, he is in for the fight of his political life in 2012.

The Republican tilt of the new district has not been lost upon the aspiring politicos of the 11^th. 2010 runner up Dr. Dan Eichenbaum is carrying the Tea Party standard, Henderson County DA Jeff Hunt is in, and 2008 runner up Spence Campbell has announced he is in the race. Sources indicate that as many as 5 more candidates are considering a run in this race, making for a crowded primary field. As I’ve stated before, this district has the greatest potential for producing a constitutional conservative nominee if enough voters rally around the one with the best chance to win. Until then it will be a true western North Carolina crapshoot.

3. 8^th District - With the Mecklenburg and Cumberland county precincts removed from the District, this 52% Obama district becomes a 57% McCain district. Larry Kissell will be hard pressed in what is one of the most Republican areas of the state under the new lines.

The primary field in this district is very wide open, as no big names have announced. So far State Representatives Jerry Dockham and Justin Burr have flirted with taking on Kissell. Scott Keadle of the Iredell County Board of Commissioners is also considering a run. This district is also open to a constitutional conservative candidate as it is very blue collar and has seen less of the major demographic changes that other North Carolina districts have seen.

4. District 7 - The new 7^th District follows I-40 from Johnston County to the coast, and will be a tough race in both the primary and the general. Despite being moved into the 8^th District, Congressman McIntyre is going to run for reelection in the 7^th. He stands a better shot than some of his Democratic colleagues given his long tenure and early financial advantage. Despite this being a 57% McCain district, the Republicans will have to work hard to take down the Blue Dog incumbent.

The main reason for the tough nature of this race will be a tough primary between 2010 nominee Ilario Pantano and state Senator Dave Rouzer. Pantano has a dedicated grassroots following, but Rouzer has the support of the State Establishment GOP. Look for this fight to be a rehash of the charges against Pantano in 2010, and a battle between the Tea Party versus the Establishment.

Conclusion The rest of the districts are all safe locks for their incumbent members. The only potential hiccups for the GOP down the road are the 9^th and 10^th Districts. When Sue Myrick decides to retire her Charlotte based district will be a battleground for whomever decides to take it on. The 10^th has the city of Asheville drawn into it so Patrick McHenry might decide to look for greener pastures in 2014 if Kay Hagan looks vulnerable. I hope that if anyone else has any insights or knows any candidates I have overlooked I welcome your comments.
--Carlton Huffman, NC LS Political Initiatives Chair

Court Slaps Quartzsite with Order to Stop Firing Cops

Via Oathkeepers

DEA agents drag man’s half-naked daughter outside during drug bust on wrong address

Via Oathkeepers

Repost: Excellent/Moving Khe Sanh Footage TET '68

TET, Little Saigon, Westminster, California 1976/77?

"Remember the Americans who fought and died for US.
We may have lost the battle, but we won our freedom"
==================================================

Some Hue and Saigon also.
===========================

================================================================

Tet '68 Bien Hoa/Long Binh, RVN TET '68, US Embassy & Saigon Graphic Fighting

Saigon Police Chief Executes VC Officer TET "68

Tet (Mau Than) '68 Action Videos

Hue TET '68

Saigon Cholon Fighting (Short One)