Saturday, December 29, 2012

Incendiary Raids on Japanese Cities

 

General LeMay expressed surprised at using the atomic bomb against the Japanese as he felt no military targets remained – his incendiary bombing had already destroyed nearly everything. The use of it is explained by Truman’s desire “that the [atomic] bomb would provide diplomatic benefits by making the Soviets more tractable” in postwar negotiations.
--Bernhard Thuersam

Incendiary Raids on Japanese Cities

“Army Air Force General Curtis LeMay ordered the American strategic bombers to begin night incendiary raids on Japanese cities rather than attempting daylight precision bombing of industrial centers. The [B-29] Superfortresses honed their skills in three raids against Tokyo. A single bombing raid in February [1945] destroyed at least 25,000 buildings. But the most devastation attack of the war, more deadly perhaps than both atomic bombs together, occurred on March 9, 1945.

Two hundred seventy-nine Superfortresses, sortieing from Guam, Saipan and Tinian, dropped firebombs from 7,000 feet on Tokyo’s residential areas.  The paper and wood city erupted in inescapable flames. Sixteen square miles were completely destroyed. 

During this single raid, approximately 100,000 Japanese civilians were killed. Many died from being scalded as they tried to save themselves by crowding into the city’s canals, which boiled. By comparison, 100,000 civilians died in the Hiroshima nuclear attack, while 35,000 died at Nagasaki.  The raid lasted three hours. American Superfortress pilots and crews in the last wave vomited in their aircraft from the stench of burning flesh carried to their mile-high altitude. 

Over successive days, the B-29s progressed to other Japanese cities. The United States burned Nagoya, Osaka, Yokohama, then Kobe. Then the bombers moved on to the lesser cities. As Japan had few [anti-aircraft] guns left, the B-29s could strike with impunity.  

Citizens were warned with leaflets that their neighborhood would be razed. But few had anywhere to go. By the end of the war, nearly 400,000 Japanese civilians would be killed, mostly in American bombing attacks. 

[From] April 1 until mid-June 1945, less than three divisions of Japanese held out in Okinawa, without support….Fourteen Japanese divisions and five….brigades protected Kyushu. President Truman later claimed, and many American sources agreed, that an invasion of Japan could have cost a million American casualties. This is far from accurate. 

General Dwight Eisenhower said that he felt that the atomic bombing was unnecessary from the point of view of saving American lives. Admiral William Leahy, Secretary of War Henry Stimson, Secretary of the Navy James Forrestal, and Army Air General Henry “Hap” Arnold, all thought that dropping the bomb was unnecessary. Japan was broken and would have surrendered without an invasion. 

The Japanese had no fuel, fewer than 10,000 trucks, almost no ability to manufacture weapons or ammunition, nor to transport supplies to Japan. They had almost no tanks left and remained wholly unable to defend themselves from air attack. Famine and disease threatened most of the population. Millions of Japanese civilians remained homeless. One by one, their cities were being razed. Japan’s air forces had been ruined, her navy wrecked. The bulk of Japan’s army was withering away in South Asia.

Nevertheless, on August 6, the first atomic bomb, dubbed “Little Boy,” was dropped on Hiroshima. [Three days] after that, the second atomic bomb, “Fat Man,” was detonated over Nagasaki.”
(Danger’s Hour, The Story of the USS Bunker Hill, Maxwell Taylor Kennedy, Simon & Schuster, 2008, pp. 195-196; page 443)

Secession Allegiance and Religion


Most people, or shall I say, most conservatives see something is terribly wrong
with the country today, but they blame everything but the right things. One of
the top comments I get from people is that we are not patriotic enough, or that people
such as myself are unpatriotic. People do not know what true patriotism is any
more, and I doubt if many of you reading this do either. So to clear up some
confusion, I am going to give you the order of where you should place your allegiance
and patriotism.

We hear people complain about the government and how it has lost touch with
the people. I am told, VOTE, be patriotic, do your duty. I ask; What is my duty;
to vote?  Honestly, do you ever see this changing anything? Has anything in the
federal government changed for the better in your lifetime? You dad's lifetime?
His dad's lifetime? The question is; What are you gonna do about it?

The following bears worth repeating. People are so dumbed down they have little
or no idea how or where they are to place their allegiance and patriotism. They
don't have a clue as to the order, with most everyone thinking or acting as if the
federal government is all there is to follow and place their allegiance in. They
think they can take a tyrannical government and correct it simply by voting, which
is what they equate to patriotism. Or they think joining the military, fighting and
dying is being patriotic. Nothing could be further from the truth as I tried to explain
to others at a blog who accused me of being unpatriotic and un-American because
I would not fight to restore DC and their form of pseudo "conservative" government.
I was told to leave the united states if it was not worth fighting for. Here is what
I posted back. Keep in mind that people in general do not know their order
allegiance, so you have to remind them... Your allegiance is NOT to the federal
government, that is a lie you've been indoctrinated into accepting in order that the
federal government may have a free reign to go to war anywhere it likes and to
pass whatever laws unto you that it deems necessary for it's safety, NOT yours!

My response: 

My state of North Carolina is worth fighting for. That is my home and my country!
Your state is worth fighting for, as that is your home and country! Patriotism originally
comes from the Greek meaning inheritor of my father’s land. (Or very similarly stated.)
Specifically; What and where is your father’s land? How did he get it and how did he
pass it to you? Your father’s land originally was the state, which is also the country he
lived in. He did not originally live in Washington DC, but in the state he called home.
This was completely true and accepted until Lincoln’s War changed this thinking with
reconstruction. (The whole nation was reconstructed, not just the South.) The union and
federal government is NOT worth fighting for. The united states is NOT my home nor
my country! It is merely a representative of our many countries, our many states.

The order in which one *supposed* is to show honor and respect is as follows.

1-God
2-Family
3-Friends and neighbors
4-Neighborhood or locality or community
5-Area region
6-State (State and country is dependent upon structure.)
7-Country
8-Nation
9-Government (Government would apply in place of No. 8 if a nation did not exist.)
Notice I did NOT add religious denominations, but religion is to be understood to be
the Christian religion including Catholicism.--NOT Mormonism or Judaism or such..
Neither is a part of Christianity.

Note: the above is a general order according to the structure of a geographic location
that would end up being a nation. A nation is simply a geographical area that
includes a people with like minds, philosophies, religion, culture and heritage.
There can be deviations but the overall effect is that the vast majority of people hold
these same or similar ideals. Note the similarity as stated in the Declaration of 
Independence from Great Britain, “We hold these truths to be self-evident…..”  As a nation all people are *supposed* to accept this basis as their basis of national unity. Sadly this does not exist today.

Note: The order is correct but there can be additions when properly placed, or there can
be certain omissions when need be, but the order remains the same in accordance to
importance. Good government is ruled from the bottom up, not from the top down, and 
your allegiance should be in like order.

Note: The government is nothing more than the will of a unified people, doing their 
bidding on a larger scale, before the countries and nations of the world. This is also why
the Federal Government *supposed* to be an agent of the states, of which the states are
representative countries. This is also why the STATES have the Inalienable Right to secede.

Note: A country by itself is not necessarily a nation, but it can be an independent country
with all the rules, laws and government of a nation when independent of national status.
A nation is merely several states with a central government representing them. 

I owe NO allegiance to any nation or government that does not fully recognize my sovereignty and right to self-determination. There is no way humanly possible, short of conflict that I can make a national government recognize my Inalienable Rights if they choose to ignore them. This is what the Federal Government in Washington DC has chosen to do. I owe them and such people as those that place their allegiance in the Federal Government NOTHING! I owe you nothing because you are part of the problem, if you are in standing with a degenerate nation and federal government in DC! The federal government is far past the point of ever correcting it's wrongs, it's usurpation of our Inalienable Rights, our states and countries. I ask you; Who has benefited from this?


Michael– Deo Vindicabamur

Enemy List

Via WRSA

 



What will be the likely model of american insurrection, if "gun control" doesn't "go well?"

Via Angry Mike


america is an armed society.

every year a huge number of americans take to the woods in pursuit of deer, elk and other critters of the fur, feathers and flesh persuasion.   and, if you read hunting magazines and gun magazines, you will well recognize that they are armed with very sophisticated weapons, in some measure, such as optics and ballistic aids, the rival of the most modern military organizations.

so, say that america erupts in rebellion against the gun confiscation measures being cooked up by obama and minions, apparently to be spearheaded in congress by the likes of pelosi, reid, feinstein and others of that ilk.  senator feinsteins pronouncements relative to her legislative aims include words like "confiscation," and "registration," long despised and detested words among pro-gun americans.

if she wanted to "press some buttons," she's pressed some buttons.

what can we view as the likely model of american insurrection?

well, it won't be along the lines of major tank battles on open terrain, such as witnessed recently in the middle east.  syrians, iraqis, egyptians, hezbollah and hamas have proved it foolhardy to go up against the modern armor of the west, principally the armies of the u.s. and israel.

fighting modern armies on open terrain is a rather foolhardy proposition, unless you are the top of the military food chain.

no, i believe that the model of conflict in the middle east as we have witnessed the last several years during the "arab spring" and other insurrections provides the proper intellectual modality to anticipate the outlines of such conflict by civilians against an established and entrenched regime.

10 Southern Pictures 1907 - 1942

   

More @ NamSouth

Pizza Hut Delivery Man Demoted After Defending Himself Against Attackers

http://foxbaltimore.com/news/features/top-stories/stories//images/wbff_top_stories_20121228_PizzaHutMan_2Dpqo.jpg 

Sam Swicegood, a Pizza Hut delivery man in Maryland fought off a group of attackers as he was attempting to deliver pizzas, and what happens? Pizza Hut gave him a demotion.

According to Swicegood, he was sucker punched, which caused his glasses to “fly off.” He then dropped the pizzas he was carrying and began to swing a small piece of a tent pole he had at his attackers, while covering his face. “It’s a little fiberglass road I had up my sleeve not thinking I would actually have to use it but more or less having a little comfort up my sleeve,” recalled Sam.
Swicegood faced five attackers and said those odds “is just not a good situation to be in.”

He said, “I thought I was about to die.”

The attackers fled without his money or his pizzas. However, Fox News Insider says that Pizza Hut cut his hours and his pay for violating their “no weapons policy.”

More @ Fox

A college student trying to make ends meet delivering pizza says he lost his job because he fought back as a group of teens attacked him. Sam Swicegood,a pizza-delivery driver, says he lost his job fighting back after he was attacked while making a delivery. Sam said something didn’t feel right so he grabbed a piece of a tent pole to protect himself just in case. Pizza Hut has a no weapon policy drivers must adhere to; in Swicegood’s case he’s now a cook and his pay and hours have been cut. Delivery-pizza’s has become a risky business, so much so police are issuing flyers that describe how drivers can and should protect themselves. Sam told FOX45 that what he did was necessary to protect himself, and he has since paid a hefty price for it. For Sam the job was helping to pay for college: “I was making about 11 or 12 dollars in tips.” It was enough to make ends meet, but that all changed a few weeks ago after Sam was attacked making a delivery in a Glen Burnie neighborhood. Sam said, “I’m pretty sure they called and ordered a delivery driver.” Sam admits he began to feel a little uneasy so before he got out of his car, he grabbed something to protect himself. It’s a decision that may have spared him from being seriously injured. “It’s a little fiberglass road I had up my sleeve not thinking I would actually have to us

Read More at: http://foxbaltimore.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/-delivery-driver-demoted-after-fighting-back-during-attack-17136.shtml#.UN-LYTmouM9
A college student trying to make ends meet delivering pizza says he lost his job because he fought back as a group of teens attacked him. Sam Swicegood,a pizza-delivery driver, says he lost his job fighting back after he was attacked while making a delivery. Sam said something didn’t feel right so he grabbed a piece of a tent pole to protect himself just in case. Pizza Hut has a no weapon policy drivers must adhere to; in Swicegood’s case he’s now a cook and his pay and hours have been cut. Delivery-pizza’s has become a risky business, so much so police are issuing flyers that describe how drivers can and should protect themselves. Sam told FOX45 that what he did was necessary to protect himself, and he has since paid a hefty price for it. For Sam the job was helping to pay for college: “I was making about 11 or 12 dollars in tips.” It was enough to make ends meet, but that all changed a few weeks ago after Sam was attacked making a delivery in a Glen Burnie neighborhood. Sam said, “I’m pretty sure they called and ordered a delivery driver.”

Read More at: http://foxbaltimore.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/-delivery-driver-demoted-after-fighting-back-during-attack-17136.shtml#.UN-LYTmouM9
A college student trying to make ends meet delivering pizza says he lost his job because he fought back as a group of teens attacked him. Sam Swicegood,a pizza-delivery driver, says he lost his job fighting back after he was attacked while making a delivery. Sam said something didn’t feel right so he grabbed a piece of a tent pole to protect himself just in case. Pizza Hut has a no weapon policy drivers must adhere to; in Swicegood’s case he’s now a cook and his pay and hours have been cut. Delivery-pizza’s has become a risky business, so much so police are issuing flyers that describe how drivers can and should protect themselves. Sam told FOX45 that what he did was necessary to protect himself, and he has since paid a hefty price for it. For Sam the job was helping to pay for college: “I was making about 11 or 12 dollars in tips.” It was enough to make ends meet, but that all changed a few weeks ago after Sam was attacked making a delivery in a Glen Burnie neighborhood. Sam said, “I’m pretty sure they called and ordered a delivery driver.”

Read More at: http://foxbaltimore.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/-delivery-driver-demoted-after-fighting-back-during-attack-17136.shtml#.UN-LYTmouM9
A college student trying to make ends meet delivering pizza says he lost his job because he fought back as a group of teens attacked him. Sam Swicegood,a pizza-delivery driver, says he lost his job fighting back after he was attacked while making a delivery. Sam said something didn’t feel right so he grabbed a piece of a tent pole to protect himself just in case. Pizza Hut has a no weapon policy drivers must adhere to; in Swicegood’s case he’s now a cook and his pay and hours have been cut. Delivery-pizza’s has become a risky business, so much so police are issuing flyers that describe how drivers can and should protect themselves. Sam told FOX45 that what he did was necessary to protect himself, and he has since paid a hefty price for it. For Sam the job was helping to pay for college: “I was making about 11 or 12 dollars in tips.” It was enough to make ends meet, but that all changed a few weeks ago after Sam was attacked making a delivery in a Glen Burnie neighborhood. Sam said, “I’m pretty sure they called and ordered a delivery driver.”

Read More at: http://foxbaltimore.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/-delivery-driver-demoted-after-fighting-back-during-attack-17136.shtml#.UN-LYTmouM9

Hundreds of Ohio school workers want to carry guns


More than 450 teachers and other school employees from around Ohio have applied for 24 spots in a free firearms-training program being offered by the Buckeye Firearms Association.

“We’re pleasantly surprised, but it’s not shocking,” Ken Hanson, legal chairman for the association, said today of the response since the group began taking applications on its website 10 days ago. “The demand has been there for quite some time.”

The issue of arming school employees to protect students has been “on the radar” of school boards in Ohio for several years, he said, but the organization decided to launch its training program after the Dec. 14 shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., where a gunman killed 20 children and six adults.

“That was the breaking point,” he said. “We decided it’s time to quit talking about it and move forward.”


Dick’s Sporting Goods Refusing To Honor Rifle Orders Placed Before CT Shooting


A Hunt

Via randir_telemnar



Plunge! Ammunition Levels Less Than 10% of Pre-Election Levels

 Via Don

VERBATIM

Plunge92 

Ammunition Stock levels have fallen by more than 90% from the pre-Election Day levels. Less than 10% remains available.  Available Ammunition links will be updated throughout the day.

Handguns are down by 80%, Long Guns by 63% for an overall 72.2% reduction in firearms inventories.

AR pattern rifles are becoming particularly difficult to source.