Saturday, September 21, 2013
A Flag By Any Other Name
I-95 Battle Flag Projects Supporter Sandy Kendall eloquently expressed his feelings about the flag chosen...
American gun use is out of control. Shouldn't the world intervene?
Via NC Renegade
Last week, Starbucks asked its American customers to please not bring their guns into the coffee shop. This is part of the company's concern about customer safety and follows a ban in the summer on smoking within 25 feet of a coffee shop entrance and an earlier ruling about scalding hot coffee.
After the celebrated Liebeck v McDonald's case in 1994, involving a woman who suffered third-degree burns to her thighs, Starbucks complies with the Specialty Coffee Association of America's recommendation that drinks should be served at a maximum temperature of 82C.
Although it was brave of Howard Schultz, the company's chief executive, to go even this far in a country where people are better armed and only slightly less nervy than rebel fighters in Syria, we should note that dealing with the risks of scalding and secondary smoke came well before addressing the problem of people who go armed to buy a latte. There can be no weirder order of priorities on this planet.

Check out the picture they posted!:) Priceless.
**********************************************
Just try it, blithering idiot.
After the celebrated Liebeck v McDonald's case in 1994, involving a woman who suffered third-degree burns to her thighs, Starbucks complies with the Specialty Coffee Association of America's recommendation that drinks should be served at a maximum temperature of 82C.
Although it was brave of Howard Schultz, the company's chief executive, to go even this far in a country where people are better armed and only slightly less nervy than rebel fighters in Syria, we should note that dealing with the risks of scalding and secondary smoke came well before addressing the problem of people who go armed to buy a latte. There can be no weirder order of priorities on this planet.
More @ The Guardian
Canada allows veiled Muslim women to bypass airport security checks
Via PISSED
I mean, what’s the point of airport security? Really? Now the jihadi savages know that all they have to do is put on the veil and they will sail right through.
CANADA allows veiled Muslim women to bypass airport security checks BanIslam, September 15, 2013
In Canada now, political correctness trumps security. Flying while Muslim means you won’t be forced to uncover your face or lift up your burqa before boarding a plane. Are we feeling safer yet?

I mean, what’s the point of airport security? Really? Now the jihadi savages know that all they have to do is put on the veil and they will sail right through.
CANADA allows veiled Muslim women to bypass airport security checks BanIslam, September 15, 2013
In Canada now, political correctness trumps security. Flying while Muslim means you won’t be forced to uncover your face or lift up your burqa before boarding a plane. Are we feeling safer yet?
More @ I Own The World
CANADA WILL ASK FOR FINGERPRINTS FROM VISITORS FROM MUSLIM COUNTRIES
Via Blue

Glory, Halleluiah! Now to start with that here or ban them all preferably.
Starting from this October (December in some countries), the Canadian
government will have special requirements for travellers from specific
countries, in other words most of these countries are Muslim. Now along
with a passport and Visa, people travelling from countries like
Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Algeria,
Yemen, Nigeria, Albania, and Somalia will also have to give a finger
print to Canadian Immigration, to ensure that multiple people are unable
to enter Canada with the same Visa.
More @ Destroy Islam Now
Muslims Killing All Non-Muslims: 39 dead in Westgate shopping terrorist attack
The religion of peace. There is only one solution and coming here, I am sure.
Congressman Wolf Demands FBI Punish Agents For CAIR Contact
Finally, pushback against the systemic infiltration of Muslim Brotherhood terror proxies in the US government. Not everyone is on the jihad payroll.
Join Congressman Frank Wolf in demanding punishment for conspiring with the enemies of the United States. Call your congressman.
We want hearings on infiltration of the USG by the Muslim Brotherhood. Read the Inspector General's report here.
Wolf Demands FBI Punish Agents For CAIR Contact IPT, September 19, 2013
On a day when the Council on American-Relations (CAIR) issued a report accusing its critics of bigotry, a Justice Department investigation reminds the public why CAIR does not merit the public's trust.
Inspector General Michael Horowitz found a series of incidents in which FBI field offices knowingly engaged in outreach activity with CAIR despite a 2008 policy banning non-investigative cooperation with the Islamist group. Only a summary of the report has been released publicly. The rest is considered classified, but has been made available to Congress.
More @ Atlas Shrugs
NC: The Military Betrays Women
Via Charlie
During a recent trip to Camp Lejeune, N.C., Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel met with 15 junior officers at the Marine Infantry School. He asked them about President Obama’s plans to assign women to Army and Marine infantry battalions, Special Operations Forces, and other “tip of the spear” fighting teams that conduct combat assaults.
According to the New York Times, Hagel got an earful. Staff sergeants worried that if women were assigned to combat, the high standards of the Marine Corps would have to be lowered, “family lives would suffer,” and rates of sexual assault and harassment would increase. When Secretary Hagel asked whether it was right to deny the opportunity to a woman who wants to join, a fearless captain replied, “I haven’t met a female Marine who is standing up and shouting, ‘I want to be infantry.’”
This must have been a shock, since the 15 Marines speaking to Hagel were not men; they were women. Similar opposition was registered when Military Times recently conducted an online survey asking active-duty female readers whether they would take a land-combat position if it were offered. Only 13 percent of the military women said yes, 9 percent weren’t sure, and a whopping 77 percent said no, they would not take a combat job.
Secretary Hagel and the Obama administration nevertheless are pushing forward with incremental plans to revoke all of women’s combat exemptions by January 2016. Once women are eligible for direct ground combat, federal courts are likely to force women into Selective Service registration and a possible future draft.
During a recent trip to Camp Lejeune, N.C., Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel met with 15 junior officers at the Marine Infantry School. He asked them about President Obama’s plans to assign women to Army and Marine infantry battalions, Special Operations Forces, and other “tip of the spear” fighting teams that conduct combat assaults.
According to the New York Times, Hagel got an earful. Staff sergeants worried that if women were assigned to combat, the high standards of the Marine Corps would have to be lowered, “family lives would suffer,” and rates of sexual assault and harassment would increase. When Secretary Hagel asked whether it was right to deny the opportunity to a woman who wants to join, a fearless captain replied, “I haven’t met a female Marine who is standing up and shouting, ‘I want to be infantry.’”
This must have been a shock, since the 15 Marines speaking to Hagel were not men; they were women. Similar opposition was registered when Military Times recently conducted an online survey asking active-duty female readers whether they would take a land-combat position if it were offered. Only 13 percent of the military women said yes, 9 percent weren’t sure, and a whopping 77 percent said no, they would not take a combat job.
Secretary Hagel and the Obama administration nevertheless are pushing forward with incremental plans to revoke all of women’s combat exemptions by January 2016. Once women are eligible for direct ground combat, federal courts are likely to force women into Selective Service registration and a possible future draft.
More @ NRO
Rand Paul's strategy to win White House: 'Entire youth vote could switch, if we know what we're doing
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., has spelled out his strategy for the GOP to retake the White House.
If Paul runs for president, as is widely expected, he will likely try to attract new voters to the GOP side – particularly young voters – with his libertarian values.
“You can see the whole, entire youth vote could switch, if we know what we’re doing,” the senator confided to a gathering of the Liberty Political Action Conference. He then proceeded to explain how the GOP could capture the prized demographic.
Paul acknowledged Obama had the youth vote. But he said the president is losing it, and one big reason is the issue of privacy.
“If we want to get the youth vote, it’s not like we have to change our message. They don’t care so much about taxes or regulations – they don’t have much money to care about – but they’ve all got a cell phone. They’re all on the Internet, and they do care about whether the government should be looking at their every search on the Internet or listening to their phone calls or recording their phone records.”
More @ WND
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
