Friday, March 2, 2012

Clues Left in Obama 'Birth Forgery' on Purpose?

An investigative "Cold Case Posse" launched six months ago by "America's toughest sheriff" – Joe Arpaio of Arizona's Maricopa County – has concluded there is probable cause that the document released by the White House last year as President Obama's birth certificate is a computer-generated forgery. The posse says it has identified at least one person of interest in the alleged forgery of Obama's birth certificate. – ABC News

Dominant Social Theme: It was a great cover-up, but now it's been found out. Obama is not what he seems to be. So what are you gonna do about it?

Free-Market Analysis: While we have always believed that President Barack Obama was controlled by the larger forces of the Anglosphere elite, the apparent forgery of his birth certificate raises even more questions.

Is it possible that Obama, one of the most powerful men on the planet, released an apparently hideously flawed document on purpose? The alternative is to believe that he put out an electronic document with NINE LAYERS that clearly seems to show evidence of tampering.

All the man and his (hypothetical) handlers had to do was print out the document and run it through a scanner (thus re-condensing the layers). Heck, they probably could just have re-saved the document as a jpeg, pdf, etc.

It seems crazy, doesn't it? Anyone who has the patience to sit through yesterday's Cold Case Posse presentation (see article excerpt above) should come away astonished by two salient facts:

MORE

7 comments:

  1. I was thinking the same thing. It would have been easy to flatten the layers and if it wasn't done, it was done on purpose.

    It goes like this. Obama was born in Hawaii but does not qualify to sit as President because under the Constitution and the Minor vs Happersatt case he cannot be considered as Natural Born because his father was born not in the US and was not a citizen at the time of B Obama's birth.

    We have several states now that are creating legislation to reaffirm this such that nobody can be on the State ballot for President unless they qualify under the original intent.

    So if the Obama war room can create a diversion to sidetrack people from the real issue when he knows full well that his real birth certificate is sitting in Hawaii he can pull it out at the right time and discredit anybody saying anything about the issue, substantive or not.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ponder for a moment -- Obama becomes unelectable through a combination of states determining that he is inelegible, thus loss of electoral votes, and an increasingly disenchanted "uncommitted" lot of voters. Is this birth certificate issue not the perfect tool to make Obama the victim of evil conservatives, and force the DNC to make the hardest decision in history - replace Obama as the Democratic Presidential Candidate with -- wait for it - Hilary. Is there any question that the New World Order elites would want Hilary as POTUS during their final run up to installing their One World Government. Is there any question whether Hilary would completely support their agenda. Is there any question whether Hilary would crush any Republican contendor once poor Obama has been forced out by the evil right wing conspiracy. May God help us all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. excellent article, excellent comments here.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As much as it pains me to be in the position of SEEMING to defend Dear Reader, As someone who's made a lucrative career as a high-end "big-head" IT Consultant, I can't help spotting some glaring problems with the methodology of the "study."

    First, they stripped all the green out of the doc, printed it, then copied it onto green paper.

    The original was - purportedly - scanned into electronic copy then later printed on green paper. The two are NOT the same!

    Further, the green paper copy from HI was then - again, purportedly - scanned into a .pdf which was then run through Photoshop for (purported) purposes of "optimization."

    If one can accept that the green-paper copy produced in Az was the functional duplicate of the HI "original", scanning it to .pdf would still require using at minimum the same type of scanner and the same version of any software if one is to make a true "apples to apples" comparison.

    All that said, the fact that the seals are one layer in the "HI doc" IS IMHO enough to call the whole thing into question. They really didn't NEED the comparison to show how suspicious the "HI doc" is.

    The CLEARLY false date stamp on his draft-reg is also especially troubling.

    All these things are ESPECIALLY worrisome given the absolute amateurish level of the mistakes being made. After all, we have whole LEGIONS of people who specialize in making up fake docs!

    Ergo, those responsible either didn't trust the spooks, just wanted to do it themselves, or deliberately made the doc SEEM like an amateur fake...

    ReplyDelete
  5. deliberately made the doc SEEM like an amateur fake

    I'm leaning that way now, but hadn't thought of it before. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete