Friday, April 20, 2012

Three in a Bed

VERBATIM POST

I may be missing something here, but can someone please explain how two me can be in bed together, having sex with the same drunken woman at the same time, only one of them, the white one, is guilty of rape

10 comments:

  1. Ah, the double whammy. Feminism and racism. Britain has gone off the deep end in so many ways its amazing. Besides the obvious question asked here, what if the guys were drunk and the woman sober? British feminists and their stooge lawmakers have ignored that side of the "too drunk to consent" rules. So much for equality eh?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Britain has gone off the deep end in so many ways its amazing.

    Just pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It ain't just british pheminists...

    In the USA, I know of a case where a college boy passed out drunk in a bed at a party. A FUGLY wench later fingered him as "father" of her baby.

    He laughed - no way in HELL he'd tap that ugly broad no matter HOW drunk he was...

    Well... DNA proved he was the Father. He still swore he'd never had sex with her.

    Eventually she admitted the truth... She'd also climbed in the bed looking to "crash" - but later realized he had an erection... She rolled him on his back and "went for a ride."

    Doctors testified for the court that it's COMMON for men to have boners while sleeping, and we all know about "wet dreams... Well, they happen - even while unconscious from a minor alcohol overdose.

    She was awarded what amounts to 1/3 of his gross income for the next 18 years - which (like ALL vagina-mony) will be calculated on his gross but taken off his net AFTER he's taxed as a single-man, and handed to her tax-free.

    In other words, she gets closer to 1/2 his NET pay for 18 years for raping him while he was unconscious.

    Just IMAGINE what they'd do to a man if those roles were reversed!

    In THIS case, it sounds more like a "train" than a "threesome - thus I assume the white guy got nailed because he jumped in for "seconds" - though why the first wasn't just as guilty is beyond me...

    This IS the law in a lot of places though - she can be screaming for more but if she later decides she was too drunk to know what she was doing at the time, HE'S A RAPIST!

    This is why - NO JOKE - I advise young men not to mess with drunk women no matter HOW hard she's coming on to him!

    It's JUST.NOT.WORTH.THE.RISK.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You've probably heard the statistic that "1 in 4 girls will be raped in her 4 years of college."

    That study defined "rape" as:
    "He lied to me (example: said he loved me) to get me to have sex."
    "I was drunk at the time."
    "He promised he'd call but he didn't."

    ...and other such idiocy. Basically, if she regretted it later, it was "rape" in the mind of these nutbags.

    The problem is that this has been the basis for all sorts of social-engineering on campuses nationwide.

    My kids went to a damn good school - one that I know has much LESS of this sort of insanity than most - but...

    When The Boy went there 11 years ago, he and all the other boys were told in no uncertain terms that they could be expelled from the University and possibly face criminal charges if they acted like college-age boys.

    No drunk sex. Not "sweet talk", no BS, if you promise to call you'd better call and so-on.

    Basically, you'd better make sure she didn't regret it later!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Basically, you'd better make sure she didn't regret it later!

    Like you said, wonder if it's worth it, which brings back the value of girls for hire!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Speaking of which, have you seen the secret-service-servicing chickie from Columbia?

    I've never paid for it in my life, but...

    May-bee, may-bee....

    ReplyDelete
  7. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/secret-service-colombian-hooker-scandal-escort-explosive-scandal-article-1.1064287

    ReplyDelete
  8. $15 bucks all night from Martini's. I never went to bed before five and sometimes eight. In my address book I wrote at this time, "Phnom Penh a fog of beautiful memories." Damn, time to go back!

    Phnom Penh 1994 - 1995
    http://www.namsouth.com/viewtopic.php?t=3223&highlight=phnom+penh
    Cambodia was nice during this time frame , and guns were allowed, but you couldn't take them into bars, so there was always a desk when you first came in to check your guns. All the goodies in life were cheap and available. I used to go this place called Martini's in Phnom Penh which was out of this world. It opened around 10 at night until four. Great snacks, food, booze, indoor, outdoor, music, dancing. I met some Army guys there who were enlisted attached to the Embassy, and they had been trained in the North Vietnamese dialect which I found strange, but never could get to the bottom of it.

    http://martini-cambodia.com/WesternStyleDisco.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/secret-service-colombian-hooker-scandal-escort-explosive-scandal-article-1.1064287

    Yes, I saw this yesterday and good to go! Wait $800 v. $15, I think not.......:) I mean there are some beautiful girls in Phnom Penh, but 99% are Vietnamese.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh I know its not just the UK, Dedicated Dad. :)

    http://www.supportguidelines.com/articles/art199903.html

    I'm guessing he's referencing SF v Alabama, see, Section 4 on the link above.

    "S.F. v. Alabama ex rel. T.M., 695 So. 2d 1186 (Ala. Civ. App. 1996)"

    ReplyDelete