VERBATIM
Breaking news on Benghazi: the CIA spokesman, presumably at the direction of CIA director David Petraeus, has put out this statement: "No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. ”
So who in the government did tell “anybody” not to help those in need? Someone
decided not to send in military assets to help those Agency operators.
Would the secretary of defense make such a decision on his own? No.
It would have been a presidential decision. There
was presumably a rationale for such a decision. What was it? When and
why—and based on whose counsel obtained in what meetings or
conversations—did President Obama decide against sending in military
assets to help the Americans in need?
So who in the government did tell “anybody” not to help those in need? Someone
decided not to send in military assets to help those Agency operators.
Would the secretary of defense make such a decision on his own? No.
It would have been a presidential decision. There
was presumably a rationale for such a decision. What was it? When and
why—and based on whose counsel obtained in what meetings or
conversations—did President Obama decide against sending in military
assets to help the Americans in need?
========================
Petraeus on Benghazi: It Wasn't Me
Central Intelligence Agency director David Petraeus has emphatically denied that he or anyone else at the CIA refused assistance to the former Navy SEALs who requested it three times as terrorists attacked the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on the night of Sep. 11. The Weekly Standard and ABC News report that Petraeus's denial effectively implicates President Barack Obama, since a refusal to assist "would have been a presidential decision."
More @ Breitbart
People died and Bush-Cheney lied. We know that for a fact
ReplyDeleteEnlighten me. What does that have to do with the price of eggs in China?
DeleteJust telling the truth since you cannot seem to find it
ReplyDeleteGo troll somewhere else. We aren't interested.
DeleteDear Anon @ 2013. Can you explain how your beloved illegal and unconstitutional soetoro-obama is qualified to be POTUS under Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution ?
Deletesoetoro-obama is a.criminal of the highest degree and deserves at minimum a cell in Guantanamo.
DAN III
"There Are Enemies Amongst Us"
Anon@2013....it appears you are just another soetoro-obamite and DHS employee attempting to foment trouble.
ReplyDeleteWhat, no dumbass replies by you ?
DAN III