Wednesday, November 7, 2012

"Most Electable"


VERBATIM

Erick Erickson pulls no punches in speaking Truth to Power about just how abysmal Mittens Romney was as a candidate, and how wretched his campaign was. Of course, this time last week he was all 'yippie, Mittens!'.

Money Quote: "Barack Obama ran on beating up Mitt Romney and Mitt Romney ran on running away from himself. He stood for nothing and everything at the same time. At least Barack Obama campaigned on the consistent message of hating Mitt Romney."

I find it rather amusing that Mr. Erickson now comments that "in four years let’s not go with the “he’s the most electable” argument. The most electable usually aren’t." Especially since Erick's main argument against Ron Paul was that he wasn't electable.

In the final analysis, neither was Mittens...just like some of us said from the beginning of the primary season. Told you so.

4 comments:

  1. In the comments section to this article, someone has thoughtfully provided a LONG list of links to previous Red State articles not only slamming Ron Paul but also reminding us (yeah, like we'd forget!) just how far in the tank Red State was for Team Mittens.

    This would be really funny if it wasn't so damn sad and pathetic.

    Deo Vindice!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This would be really funny if it wasn't so damn sad and pathetic.

      Absolutely.

      Delete
  2. I read Red State but hate myself for it. They hate RP.
    Ericsson switched because he is a sellout. He was a huge Perry supporter. Not that I was a fan of Perry, his record in Texas was less than conservative.
    As long as I am carrying on, watch out for Marco Rubio. I supported him against Crist in his senate run but I have come to believe he is just another establishment Republican progressive. Better than Crist, but....
    Terry

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can't trust any of them. Did you see this?

      http://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2012/11/several-ron-paul-republicans-win.html

      Delete