The Morning After The Election:

Early last evening, mainstream media reporter Tom Brokaw noted how fractured the political landscape in America is, and that whoever won the presidential election had to cope with healing the stark 50-50 division of political ideologies and actually govern effectively.  The popular vote truly indicates how large that fracture is, and it is very clear that we live in a territorial political construct  inhabited by people with little resemblance to the America of 1950.  

As one looks at the Electoral College map results, it is evident where the stark ideological divisions are between Americans – slightly more who are comfortable with a Democrat Party platform little different than that of the 1936 Communist Party USA, and slightly less who support the party of big business, incessant war and corporate bailouts.  Neither represents the letter or intent of the United States Constitution, nor does either intend to end the imperial wars bleeding us into bankruptcy.

The problem is not so much with a sitting president who came out of nowhere and refuses to address simple questions regarding his citizenship; the people, Americans, who would vote for a confirmed Marxist to be president of the United States and represent them as a leader, is a clear sign that we no longer live in the country of the Founders. If we did not realize this before, we must realize this now.  If we did nothing to correct this in the past year, we must begin to correct it in the next.

That Electoral College map also let us know where the strength of this Marxist vote is, centered in New England, spilling into Florida, the Midwest and the Left Coast.  Even Virginia, overrun by the vast magnitude of federal agencies, departments and war munitions representatives, has become saturated with those voting for the federal status quo.

Brokaw’s fractured America comment forces us to confront not only the 50-50 ideological split, but also the Balkanized multicultural hell that America has become. The national election landscape is dominated by the squabbling interests of Mexicans, radical feminists, Muslims, gay rights advocates, and environmental Marxists taking center stage to any discussion of federal adherence to the Constitution and the sovereignty of the States.  Do we want to live another minute in this territorial concoction of bizarre and widely-disparate political ideologies and interests?  And are not both parties responsible for the floodgates against unrestricted immigration being cast wide open – and which resulted in this bizarre concoction?    

We know too that the so-called presidential debates are farcical at best, and see the irony that Americans had to visit the Russian www.rt.com website to see and hear the presidential debate between legitimate third-party candidates for president, who the corporate media in this country suppressed. What sort of free country has candidates for office voter information suppressed?

Many may feel distressed that a Marxist president won a second term, reelected by those who cannot understand the structure of the Constitution and the strictly limited powers delegated to the three branches of government. This is what we of the League must come face to face with and work hard to resolve: many North Carolinians voted to reelect Obama, only slightly less than who voted for Romney.  Re-calibrating those misguided North Carolinians must be our top priority. 

Romney represented the usual corporate interests of the big business, surveillance state, perpetual warfare Republican party.  What would be different in North Carolina had Romney won? What tremendous changes were North Carolina Republicans expecting to occur in our State if Romney was president-elect? Lesser federal mandates? Less dependence on federal dollars? Less interference in our children’s education? Did they believe that Romney would immediately direct the federal agent to observe the Tenth Amendment? So why would anyone fret that Romney didn’t win the election, since the result would be little different than a continuance of Obama’s reign?  Reform is not possible with these two parties.

Perhaps the Republicans lost once again because the best they could produce as a presidential candidate was another John McCain, both posing as “conservatives” and hoping voters like us would fall for it.  As the late Sam Francis would tell us, they are indeed the “Stupid Party” and we should expect another McCain or Romney paraded out for 2016. 

As recently said by LS President Dr. Michael Hill, we can expect increased interest in the League after an Obama win, primarily due to the “conservative” Republicans inability to confront the Marxists in power. We must be ready for this dissatisfaction with the Republican party and become even more active politically in our own communities.  Order copies of The Free Magnolia from the LS office, distribute them locally, use them to engage people in conversation and gently urge attendance at an upcoming League Conference to hear practical, realistic political discussion and solutions.  Make this an opportunity to bring several guests with you to our 17 November Fall Conference in Burlington. 

Remember, Romney would have been little different than Obama, it was only Republican campaign ads that wanted us to believe he was a “conservative” ready to lead us back to a glorious Constitutional republic. We are much smarter than that.

Bernhard Thuersam, State Chair

North Carolina League of the South

bernhard1848@att.net