On Illegitimate holders of Constitutional offices

Just a few thoughts tonight, nothing heavy.

A few folks have left comments around that they intend to sign up for every Government handout they can, in an effort to tax the system and help rush the Implosion.

I would ask Patriots to reconsider that course.  Do not surrender your deepest principles in such a manner.  Do not let fellow Patriots who may one day be sifting through the records of FSA recipients in order to hold trials find your name on the FSA list.  You'll have a very hard time explaining it away.  Some will have a zero-f'n-tolerance rule, and some will only cut slack to Vets.  Taking FSA money is directly stealing from me and everyone else who works - don't be that guy.

And if the goal is to tax the resources of the system, nothing beats a good crime spree.  How many bureaucratic man-hours must be spent chasing down the average "Criminal"?  From LEO to operators to court clerks to PR spokesmen, to insurance adjusters and claims, et cetera.  And the books are filled with "Crimes" that are merely malum prohibitum, with no moral injury done to the "Criminal".  Indeed, one could make the argument that a Patriot exercising his personal Liberty in manners that run afoul of "Laws" that offend Natural Law or Rightful Liberty is behaving patriotically.

And the Patriot who uses such endeavors as training exercises, without getting caught, will be ahead of the curve when the pretense of RoL is finally dismissed. 

Let's not forget how a properly motivated Patriot could infuse the public's mind with a Robin Hood storyline.

Of course, this is all just a rhetorical exercise.  Crime is wrong...or did I just argue that it is not necessarily wrong...

I wonder how expensive all those cameras are...and I'd bet even something as simple as spray painted tags mocking TPTB in prominent places would satisfy several objectives.

A note on the legitimacy of this election: By every modern metric one must conclude that the election was done "properly" and is legitimate.

But as I often ask Patriots to do, I will ask again: Consider the fundamental premise upon which that conclusion is reached. 

Is the election legitimate from a Constitutional perspective?

Only if one accepts "General Welfare" and "Interstate Commerce" definitions currently used by the Establishment and the Left.

However, anyone who defines the Constitution through the lens of the Founders Intent must conclude that since so many Articles of the Constitution and BoR Amendments are being violated by those in office, and since any "Law" passed that is in violation of the Constitution has no force and is invalid, then those elected are criminals, behaving treasonously in regards to the Constitution, and therefore taking office and executing their offices criminally.

No Traitor can be said to "legitimately" or "Constitutionally" hold office.

They are usurpers, they are Domestic Enemies.

They are not legitimate holders of Constitutional offices.

Kerodin
III