During
the First World War the United States surpassed England as a world
power with Europe in debt to us. By 1940, England was near bankruptcy
and guaranteeing the protection of countries it could not afford to
defend. Its relatively short tenure as a world superpower ended there;
the US became the next superpower manipulating its national debt for
world dominance.
--Bernhard Thuersam
The National Interest Lost in the Shuffle:
“Before
the Glorious Revolution of 1688, Britain had been no more than a
marginal military and economic power, with only a few tenuous colonies
in the Americas. As late as the 1660s, the Dutch navy had dared to sail
right into the Thames Estuary, where it burned five British men-of-war
and seized the Royal Charles, the British ship-of-the-line that carried
King Charles II home from exile in 1660.
Yet
100 years and 272 million [pounds] of debt later, Britain had become
the linchpin of European politics, the Royal Navy was supreme around the
world, and the sun had stopped setting on the British Empire. The
British economy grew strongly during this period as well, with national
income more than doubling (although, to be sure, national income
remained highly skewed toward the upper classes). By 1790 the
Industrial Revolution….was rapidly increasing the rate of its economy.
It would, in the next half-century, make Britain the world’s first
superpower, although the Napoleonic wars, which occurred at the same
time, caused the national debt to increase to no less than 844 million
[pounds] by 1819.
[The]
British experience demonstrates that a national debt, properly funded
and serviced, can be a potent instrument of national policy. The secret,
of course, is in the funding and servicing. [Britain] turned its tax
[gatherers] into bureaucrats at the same time it had created a national
debt in the modern sense, on e funded by long-term bonds (and some,
called Consols, that never mature) that could be traded in the
marketplace. The effect was to greatly liquefy the national wealth,
allowing it to flow more easily to where opportunity beckoned and to
fund the costs of an expansionist foreign policy.
Thus
no other country in Europe was able to match Britain’s ability to
marshal so much of its national wealth for the purpose of waging war,
while disrupting its national economy so little. For instance, because
of Britain’s ability to raise cash, the government could hire foreign
soldiers to fight many of the country’s battles (such as the Hessian’s
who fought in the American Revolution).
Today,
nearly everyone, conservative and liberal alike, agrees that something
is terribly wrong with how the US government conducts it fiscal
affairs. [From 1982-1997] have been marked by a more than 25% increase
in federal revenues (in constant dollars) and the collapse of its only
significant external military threat. Yet in those years the United
States spent as much of tomorrow’s money as it would have spent fighting
a major war or new Great Depression, the primary cause of past
deficits. And yet in the past sixty-plus years, the United States has
made no attempt whatever to pay down its debt and, more recently, has
borrowed even more money as it there were no tomorrow, despite the fact
that most of those years were both peaceful and prosperous.
How
did the world’s oldest continuously constituted republic lose control
of so fundamental a responsibility of government as its own budget? The
answer, as with most governmental policy disasters in a democracy, is
one innocuous step at a time. While politicians, economists – and many
others – pursued their self-interests, the national interest largely got
lost in the shuffle. The budget system has become ever more heavily
biased toward spending, while the tax system has become ever more unable
to yield increased revenue.
Today
the American debt has grown…to a point where, at $51.1 trillion (1997),
it is incomprehensible to the average American. In 1916, the richest
man in the country, John D. Rockefeller, could have paid off the
national debt all by himself. In 1997 William Gates and Warren Buffett
together could not pay two months’ interest on it – about $50 billion –
without going broke.”
(Hamilton’s Blessing, John Steele Gordon, Penguin Books, 1997, pp. 2-9)
Above is the drawback to unmoderated comments.
ReplyDeleteImagine how great the world would be if we all would just "proportion we keep in touch extra"!
Roger U
Yes , spam usually gets them, but this one came through. I hate filling out those "prove you're not a robot" things, but I guess I could just bypass that, but moderate if you think it might be better.
Delete