Friday, January 4, 2013

A Young Man Enamored of Naval Power

 

Author John T. Flynn brings to question the sort of person Americans raise to high leadership positions, and what little qualifications those people may possess. FDR was a dangerous man to raise to the presidency, and by 1935 was using the communist-infiltrated American labor unions and their immense financial power to control the Democratic party and the federal government.  Flynn was being generous to FDR is stating that he did not realize “the peril to which he and the labor leaders were exposing both the unions and the country.” He further stated that “Roosevelt, through a combination of events and influences, fell deeper and deeper into the toils of various revolutionary operators, not because he was interested in revolution but because he was interested in votes.”
--Bernhard Thuersam

A Young Man Enamored of Naval Power:

“At Columbia, Franklin D. Roosevelt’s studies took about the same course as his journey through college. He did not seem interested – rather bored. He studied but little and was never able to graduate. He was admitted to the bar later by taking a bar examination without his degree.  

His career as a lawyer was more or less casual.  He got a place in the Wall Street firm of Carter, Ledyard and Milburn [a firm which would usually] select their young law clerks from among the honor men in the leading Eastern law schools. Roosevelt was not an honor student, didn’t even graduate. But his family influence was sufficient to replace these qualifications. 

What practice he did was in admiralty law.  And always he continued to buy naval pictures – engravings of old battleships and books on naval history. He was never a reader of books. He did not give much of his time to the reading or study of history or the history of government. Such reading as he did was rather in the field of military and particularly naval history. But it would be a mistake to describe him as a student of these things.  It was a hobby, a form of pleasure and not a field of study or research.

In New York City and State one of the master politicians of our history was towing the Democratic party, with Tammany [Hall] as his tractor. This was Charles Murphy….[who] skillfully managed [the Democratic ticket in New York]…and young twenty-eight year-old Franklin D. Roosevelt was swept into the State Senate [in 1910] on the crest of that wave. 

I think we shall be fair to Mr. Roosevelt if we say at this point that there was no special reason why he should be named to the Senate. He had taken no part in politics. He had no career of any sort. He ran for reelection in 1912 and, in that great Democratic year, was re-elected. 

He became enthusiastic for [Woodrow] Wilson and made an effort to organize a Democratic movement for him in New York States. He had been a delegate from his district to the Baltimore convention which nominated Wilson [for president] and there had met Josephus Daniels and other national leaders.

[Roosevelt] belonged to that element in New York that might be called the “social welfare” school. It was made up largely of wealthy people who were interested in doing something for the poor with private funds. It was based, of course, very solidly upon the complete defense of wealth accompanied by a generous sense of obligation to use that wealth in the public good.

Politics afforded that easy-going mingling with people, talking, going to meetings, holding conferences, sitting around, making friends, having one’s say, without digging or that severe discipline essential in the professions or business. When Roosevelt got to Washington, what he wanted was offered to him. Josephus Daniels had been selected by Wilson as secretary of the navy. Daniels had asked Wilson if he would approve the appointment of young Roosevelt as assistant secretary….Wilson liked the idea of a Democratic Roosevelt in his administration. 

The day of the inauguration Daniels offered the post to Roosevelt – asked him if he would like it. “Why I would like it!” rhapsodized Roosevelt. “I’d rather have that place than any other in public life….All my life I have been crazy about the navy.”

The Assistant Secretary of the Navy is a very important person. One wonders what training or experience this young man had had that supported his claim for this post. He had never had any administrative experience whatever. He had literally no career outside a brief political one in the State legislature.  His sole work in private life had been as a law clerk….for a couple of years, to which job he devoted but little of his time and that without interest. He had no experience around the navy. He had merely collected a lot of pictures of battleships and some books on the navy. 

He was chosen, of course, because of two utterly hostile forces – Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt – the Wilson tide that washed the Democrats into power; the Roosevelt name in New York that invested this untried youth with a special value to the Democrats. 

As soon as he found himself in that [Navy] office he did, of course, precisely what you would expect of the youth who wanted to go to Annapolis, who collected naval battle scenes, worshipped warships. The world was in profound peace. But before he was on the job a month he began to clamor for a big navy.  Roosevelt became almost the only exponent of a big navy in the [Wilson] administration. Secretary Daniels was suspicious of the idea as well as of the big shipbuilding and steel interests that were interested in the subject.  So Roosevelt was looked upon in the department as God’s gift to the admirals. 

On April 11, only weeks after he was sworn in (when there wasn’t a war-cloud in the world), he said:

“This [need for a large navy] is not a question of war or peace….We are confronted with a condition….We want the country to feel, too, that in maintaining a fighting force of the highest efficiency we are at the same time educating thousands of young men to be better citizens.”

[He] wrote in the Scientific American, February 28, 1914: 

“In time of war, would we be content [to see] an enemy supersede us in every outlying port, usurp our commerce and destroy our influence as a nation throughout the world? We must create a navy not only to protect our shores and our possessions but our merchant ships in time of war, no matter where they may go.”

Here, twenty-six years ago, before the World War was launched or even dreamed of – this young man, enamored of naval power and of ballet squadrons, was talking about national defense. But he explained very clearly that he [was speaking] about naval power upon all the seas of the world, great enough to assert our might everywhere, “running a thousand miles out to sea.”

When the war in Europe began, Mr. Roosevelt became immediately one of the most bellicose of the administration group in Washington. He continued, after the war was over, to clamor for more ships and more fighting men. 

One of the strange episodes of the Navy Department occurred after the war was all over. During the war there had been an immense haste [to build ships, but by June 1919,] when the terms of the Treaty were settled….the Navy Department went ahead with its war building program as if nothing had happened.  The keels of ninety-seven destroyers were laid after the armistice, costing $181,000,000. There was of course no justification for this.  Ten cruisers, costing about ten millions of dollars each, were also rushed ahead after the war was over.  [The young secretary] was merely carried away by his enthusiasm for warships. It was this which made his office so hospitable a place for the shipbuilders. 

[Roosevelt] had never been in any business. It is a singular feature of his career that his first administrative post was one that involved the expenditure of countless millions and under circumstances that suspended all the normal and necessary restraints and cautions. Money was no object alongside of victory. In a speech later in the Brooklyn Academy of Music he told with a great deal of satisfaction how he had thrown money around during the war. On another occasion he boasted that he had paid no attention to rules, regulations, and laws – that he had broken enough laws to be put in jail for 999 years. 

It is a fact of importance that in the shaping of his public career his first experience in administration should have been under circumstances where ordinary prudence, the rules of the department, the normal scrutinizes of business and the very laws themselves could be daily thrown into the wastebasket. It made a profound impression upon his habits of thought and his methods of doing things. 

It was therefore a simple matter, when the war was over and the need had passed and the public attention was directed elsewhere, that in his zeal for war vessels, his ambition for a vast naval establishment, the “greatest in the world,” capable of extending its power over the oceans “a thousand miles out to sea,” able to defend our ships “no matter where they may go,” he should be willing to slip over these hundreds of millions of contracts.”

(Country Squire in the White House, John T. Flynn, Doubleday, Doran and Company, 1940, pp. 8-14; 16-23)

14 comments:

  1. "...not because he was interested in revolution but because he was interested in votes.”

    I think sometimes we forget what a politician's job really is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very few take their job seriously according to the Constitution.

      Delete
    2. I believe the founders thought the Congress would keep Presidents and Supreme Courts honest as regards the Constitution. Lincoln shattered that dream and succeeding Congresses haven't really tried to hold feet to the fire. Seems like everywhere I looked today somebody was bad-mouthing Ron Paul. I believe I could happily pull the trigger on a Ron Paul hater.

      My 49 year old daughter came over today and we watched Enemy At The Gates on FX. I showed her my most recent M_N with the scope and she was really impressed. She asked if Vasili Zaitsev was Russia's best sniper and was astounded when I told her that I thought all their best snipers were women, and good-looking women too. I need to re-read Brock's earlier stuff on this subject, which I saved so as to impress the next woman who comes along and who will listen to my ramblings.

      I had just emailed her my e-mail of the day, transmitting Russell Means first video on matriarchy. She has had a very hard life with having had scoliosis as a ten-year old and endometriosis a few years ago. She has never complained and is my All Time Hero.

      A curmudgeonly old chemistry professor of mine at Mars Hill Jr. college would often break into a tirade about FDR and all Roosevelts being the family of easy, unearned money. My post-retirement Internet research confirms everything he said and more. At the time (1951) I thought he was an old fool. Brain-washing is hard to let go of. My dad met General Theodore Roosevelt, Jr. walking with a cane on Utah Beach on about D-Day plus 5 or 6. He was greatly impressed with him. I'll go with my dad and put all the other Roosevelts in the trash can of history.

      Delete
    3. Seems like everywhere I looked today somebody was bad-mouthing Ron Paul.

      It's obvious all but Libertarians have no use for our Founding Fathers. Pathetic.
      =================
      I showed her my most recent M_N with the scope

      What scope and mount did you use? I still haven't made up my mind.
      ==================
      She has never complained and is my All Time Hero.

      Just wonderful.
      ==================
      My dad met General Theodore Roosevelt, Jr. walking with a cane on Utah Beach on about D-Day plus 5 or 6. He was greatly impressed with him

      Thanks.

      Delete
    4. Big 5 has a scope and mount for seventy bucks. I had to grind a little to get it to mount but it seems quite solid. The brand of the scope says AIM, 2-7x-32 mm. I'd like to think I'll ever sight it in but who knows? I know I should have bought several more. I shot one of the long ones at my son's range in Wenatchee with iron sights and I was frankly amazed at how well I did.

      I bought dies from Cabelas and cases at the gun shows for fifty cents each and .311 bullets for $26 per hundred and loaded a couple hundred rounds. I had bought a 440 round can of milsurp for $104 and quite a few boxes of 20 for five bucks each. Big 5 has some 7.62 X 54R that are/were bargain priced and may or may not have non-corrosive primers, but since they have steel cases they probably are corrosive..

      Most of the M-Ns shoot very high at 100 yds., at least mine have and as I recall, the internet chat rooms say that they were designed to aim at a man's crotch at 200 yds. and hit him high in the chest.

      So, I used electric wire insulation. I cut short pieces and put it down over the front sight post to raise the sight and lower the stiking point. This was done about five years ago to 2 rifles and proved out on the Cherry Creek range. This technique worked perfectly for iron sight shooting.

      Man, I loved shooting rifles, any rifle. When I'm feeling a little low I take out my Dad's Combat Infantryman badge and remember how much I owe him and all those twenty year old boys buried in France.

      My most treasured photo has dad and his Fourth Infantry buddies (with one French beauty) in France in September 1944. I want to send it to you, not to post, but just because I'm so damn proud of it and I don't seem to have many people who care any more. Fortunately, my wife does.

      Delete
    5. Does yours look anything like this one?

      http://www.combathunting.com/MOSIN_NAGANT-Mosin_Nagant_Sniper_Scope_Mount_With_Bolt_Kit.html
      ================
      My most treasured photo has dad and his Fourth Infantry buddies (with one French beauty) in France in September 1944.

      Send it quickly!

      Delete
  2. No. Yours looks like a better quality. At least the scope. Mine has no bolt handle and the base looks to be the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, it is a shame to drill into the weapon, but there are problems with the mount moving if it isn't.

      Delete
  3. Also, mine has a long eye relief and does not come back over the receiver.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Long eye relief is good, but you lose the rear iron site I am told and I want to keep it. Thanks.

      Delete
  4. And mine has a butt pad and a sling.

    http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/aim-sports-mosin-nagant-kit.aspx?a=916756

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looks like your mount isn't drilled/tapped on.

      Here's my M44.

      http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-dnBg0Z4zMvE/TXhRqRAGZZI/AAAAAAAAAjI/oHtju3RyVpk/s1600/P1000719.JPG

      Delete
  5. No drilling or tapping required on the Big 5 AIM kit, nor bolt replacement. The one you show looks much better. What do they cost? I think I'll get one of them for my other long Mosin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. $120. http://www.combathunting.com/MOSIN_NAGANT-Mosin_Nagant_Sniper_Scope_Mount_With_Bolt_Kit.html

      Delete