Via Mike
Immigration reform is a
complex issue that requires significant time and public engagement to be
handled responsibly and to produce legislation that will actually work.
We need to have open public hearings on every aspect of this proposed
reform — visa overstays, exit and entry systems, future flow, chain
migration, the public-charge rule, fiscal impacts, worksite security,
law-enforcement concerns, etc. For instance, the ICE officers’ union has
asked repeatedly to be given a chance to participate in White House
discussions and to speak with the Gang of Eight, but has been unable to
get a meeting — even as the special interests report almost daily on
their access and engagement.
One of the most important concerns — and too little discussed — is
the economic impact. The last time Congress considered a comprehensive
immigration bill, unemployment was 4.5 percent. Today, it’s nearly 8
percent. Forty percent of those unemployed have been out of work for six
months or longer. The labor force participation rate is at a
thirty-year low. The unemployment rate for teenagers is 25.1 percent.
Wages are stagnant. Never before have more Americans been on food stamps
and other forms of welfare. Yet all we hear from those interests
pushing for a comprehensive immigration bill is that we have a labor
shortage and need to import more low-skill workers. An expanded
guest-worker program will not benefit unemployed American and legal
workers. We should be trying to help unemployed Americans find good
jobs, not importing cheap labor to take these jobs.
A well-planned
welfare-to-work program — turning the welfare office into a
job-placement center — is what is needed.
No comments:
Post a Comment