I believe Mr. Farris is being more than a gentleman in this case, because Common Core is pure Marxist indoctrination, nothing less and nothing more.
Dear HSLDA members and friends,
We spent about an hour together on the phone. The conversation was very cordial. Both of us showed that we truly listened to and heard the other person’s position. And both of us stood strongly on our principles and core positions. I was really glad that we talked.
His initial presentation walked me through several features of the Common Core. From a pedagogical perspective, there are clearly some good ideas contained in it. When it came time for me to respond, I began with a story. I once testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee when Senator Joseph Biden was chairing a hearing on a Supreme Court nominee. Before I began, Biden asked me, “I have a question for you. Is it your idea to force everyone to homeschool?”
I told Mr. Coleman that the point of the story was this: Just because you have a good idea (homeschooling in my case, Common Core in his case), it doesn’t mean that it is appropriate to force everyone in the country to follow your idea. And that is my central problem with the Common Core and all forms of centralized educational planning.
To his credit, Mr. Coleman noted that he was not acting in a vacuum. There are centralized mandates for education in play virtually everywhere. And many of them have very marginal educational utility. I agreed with his assessment of many current centralized standards.
However, my response was that the solution is not a national set of standards, but allowing each state to develop its own standards. Competing standards from all 50 states would be likely to create more innovations—although my clear preference is to do away with all forms of centralized government standards. (I believe that public schools should form their own local standards.)
When he asked me why I thought that the Common Core was worse than other standards, I indicated that one of my chief concerns was the creation of the database that would track students throughout their educational career.
His answer surprised me. He didn’t like the database all that well. It was not originally part of the Common Core, but other people have seized the opportunity to make a centralized data collection effort through the implementation of the Common Core.
We talked about many other details, but these were some of the most important.
I walked away wishing that more political conversations could be like this one. Polite. Professional. Helpful.
He acknowledged some good ideas that I shared, and I did the same.
I strongly oppose the Common Core for reasons I shared with him in detail. But I want to do my best to avoid demonizing those who promote it. He is motivated by what he truly thinks is best for education and for kids. I think his plans are unwise, especially when coupled with government coercion. But I will not question either his motives or his character.
We came away believing that each of us is acting in good faith. I think we make better policy decisions when we avoid the invective and simply look to the substance. That much, David Coleman and I have in common.
For Liberty,
Mike Farris
I found a 1944 newspaper clipping in my parents papers while looking for a photo that was titled "The Great Brain" . The title intrigued me so much that I read it. The author of the op ed was pointing out how the educational system was trying to be transformed by the Roosevelt's into a top down communist educational system with national standards. From reading this op ed piece, common core isn't new. It is just a repackaged renamed 1940's era commie indoctrination plan. I can forward a copy to you if you would like.
ReplyDeleteCertainty and thanks.
DeleteRespecting a man because he has right intentions does not mean we should follow, nor adopt their dogma. He has benefitted from an idea that may have merit, but destroyed good intentions with his strange bedfellows. Were I a parent of the South, with children of homeschooling age, I would certainly not entrust my children to this government.
ReplyDeleteWere I a parent of the South, with children of homeschooling age, I would certainly not entrust my children to this government.
DeleteAbsolutely.
The problem begins with an acceptance of government sponsered childhood indoctrination centers.
ReplyDeleteOnce that notion is rejected we can better construct a method by which our values are articulated and preserved.
"Do we really think that a government-dominated education is going to produce citizens capable of dominating their government, as the education of a truly vigilant self-governing people requires?"
[Alan Keyes]
The problem begins with an acceptance of government sponsered childhood indoctrination centers.
DeleteAgreed.
First, it matters not where you are, North, South, East, or West, homeschooling is the only alternative to government schools. Perhaps religious schools, if that's your bent.
ReplyDeleteAs long as women choose to have "careers" instead of actually investing the time to raise their children, government schools are a convience for them, plus the time they are in government school it is that much less time they don't have to pay a babysitter. I'm not saying women shouldn't have careers if that is what they want, but have the moral courage not to bring children into the world for someone else to raise if a career is the choice. That old saw about, yes, you can have it all, or it's all about "quality" time is a bunch of BS.
Miss Violet
"quality" time is a bunch of BS.
DeleteAmen and ranks right up there with "if you please" with me.:)