“In his zeal to
preserve the Union, [Lincoln] abandoned statecraft, exploiting the
delicate issue of Fort Sumter and committing the nation to a bloodbath
for worse than he or any of his advisors ever envisioned. At the time,
his belligerent course promised no better result than maintaining the
territorial integrity of the United States at the expense of weakening
the Constitution, and with no initial hint at eliminating slavery.
In
his mission to preserve the nation’s geographic boundaries, Lincoln
quickly violated his oath to “preserve, protect, and defend the
Constitution of the United States.” He did so in the executive power he
assumed, in the increase of federal authority that he imposed in order
to prosecute the war, and in his arbitrary suspensions of constitutional
liberties.
By
sheer military might his proxies deposed the duly elected legislatures
of two States of the Union. If he did not resurrect the Roman custom of
dictatorship in a time of crisis, he did introduce a modified form of
the concept in a republic that would previously never have borne it.
Lincoln
gradually arrogated so much authority to his office that his own
dominant party dared not pass that power on to a member of the
opposition. When the Democrat Andrew Johnson succeeded Lincoln and
resisted Radical Republican aims, a Republican Congress and Supreme
Court quickly curtailed presidential powers through legislation,
judicial interpretation, and political maneuvers, including the first
exercise ( and the first abuse) of the power to impeach a president.
Unfortunately, no retroactive restraint could restore the antebellum
intolerance to authoritarian government.
Lincoln
. . . might have averted the clash [at Sumter] had he been willing to
negotiate a peaceful separation, but he represented a nationalist
faction [and culmination[ of a peaceful settlement would have demanded
truly inspired statecraft: instead, Lincoln elected to risk a
confrontation at Fort Sumter even though his personal emissary, Stephen
Hurlbut, had assured him that it would end in violence.
Lincoln (May he burn in hell) elected a confrontation at Fort Sumter BECAUSE his emissary assured him it would end in violence. There was no way he was going to let the region that paid the most Federal taxes leave without a fight.
ReplyDeleteYup.
DeleteLincoln Instigated The Firing On Ft. Sumter - Quotes
http://www.namsouth.com/viewtopic.php?t=98&highlight=sumter
"You and I both anticipated that the cause of the country would be advanced by making the attempt to provision Ft Sumter, even if it should fail; and it is no small consolation now to feel that our anticipation is justified by the result. "
--Lincoln, Letter To Gustavus Fox on 1 May, 1861
"He (Lincoln) himself conceived the idea, and proposed sending supplies, without an attempt to reinforce giving notice of the fact to Gov Pickins of S.C. The plan succeeded. They attacked Sumter it fell, and thus, did more service than it otherwise could."
--Senator Orville Hickman Browning's diary dated July 3, 1861
(Lincoln's personal and political friend)
A.Lincoln failed to uphold the "founding principle" upon which the federal Constitution was based..."consent of the governed." Thus, he not only abrogated his oath to uphold the federal Constitution, but he trashed the principle upon which it stood...Mankind's God-given right to self-determination, when he refused the right of Southern Americans to exercise this right, when they elected to secede from the malfunctioning Union. A.Lincoln had no right to do this, since he was not God, the only source of the power to grant this right to Mankind. In other words, A.Lincoln "played God" with the right of Southern Americans to re-establish the limited constitutional government envisioned by the Founding Fathers.
ReplyDelete:) The source of our present problems.
Delete