Tuesday, December 10, 2013

The Hanging Of Mary Surratt–Judicial murder and government dirty linen–part two

Via Billy

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjojRcbvxz8xFI4a2CdzvCe9QBHREUfvXJ_svf6tBn1B-ppi-T1JJikXSL-th3_4fvqVNRvHJb3NJWR5nd1TZFlMAKwEOyGvjzDBKvQIVuKqcxSs3DKMAjTQMnaDDGLLcvtMUhNeHelxw8Z/s1600/mary+hanged.jpg

The “trial” of Mary Surratt and the Lincoln conspirators is still something that is debated about even today. If you want to see some of the arguments, check out the Internet. I read several articles awhile back about the involvement of Dr. Samuel Mudd, the man who set John Wilkes Booth’s broken leg.

Mudd claimed he did not know Booth. He was still sent to the Dry Torgugas as a prisoner. Others have claimed that Mudd “was in it up to his eyeballs.” So the argument is anything but settled.

The question has arisen–was it even a legal trial or not?  Reverdy Johnson, Mrs. Surratt’s first attorney, had contended that the military court that tried the conspirators was without proper authority to do so as long as the civil courts were sitting.

No comments:

Post a Comment