Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Predicting World War III – Part 3 (The Counter-Revolutionary Trigger)

Via southwind

 

There has not been a civil war in America since 1865. What could possibly cause Americans to turn against each other today? We have previously mentioned economic collapse as trigger for a civil war.

A trigger, however, is not the real cause. The trigger is merely a mechanism for igniting a conflagration which has long been prepared.

The preparation is found in the class warfare rhetoric of today. It is found in the unbalanced racial politics, in the precise formulations of feminism. In many ways, these are carefully constructed instruments with which to divide the people of America; specifically, to divide women from men, blacks from whites, poor from rich, liberal from conservative, etc.

To divide America into two or more hostile camps is one of the objectives of the Communists. The attempt at division is pro-forma. A good strategist always attempts to divide his enemy’s forces so he can defeat them in detail, or turn them against each other. By making Americans believe that there is a struggle for power ongoing between men and women, blacks and whites, rich and poor, and by focusing the energies and emotions of women, blacks and the poor toward a final victory over a supposed oppressive and ugly capitalist system, a useful power-base can be formed with which to take control of America. This power base excoriates the man, the white race, and the rich. Such becomes “the enemy” of all others.

This is, to be sure, only a basic overview of the enemy’s strategic architecture with regard to American domestic politics. Firmly resting upon the fissures of sex, race and economic status, there are many additional nuances and complexities to be considered. The final objective of the strategy is to own the world. The means for achieving this objective is to defeat the United States. 

The intermediate objectives for achieving U.S. defeat may be enumerated as follows:

More @ JR Nyquist

4 comments:

  1. Only if we submit to shallow thinking. Many will.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What you are describing is not really civil war but more akin to anarchy. The states are as corrupt as Washington and differ from them only in the degree to which they can operate. So there can't be a coalition of states to oppose the other states as happened in the 1861 conflict. The next time will be non-state actors in conflict with people inside their own jurisdictions and state boundaries.

    --Hale

    ReplyDelete