In the aftermath of round one of the Bundy Ranch armed siege by the U.S. government, I have decided to offer the federal government an intelligent analysis of the new rules of engagement. People like Daniel P. Love, Special Agent in Charge of BLM Region 3, desperately need to review and learn these rules. Other federal agents also need to understand the tectonic shift of power that has just taken place and how it will impact their operations from here forward.
Why am I doing this? Because the BLM, through its astounding incompetence and arrogance, very nearly initiated a massacre at Bundy Ranch which would have been disastrous for the BLM agents actively engaged there. The incident very nearly came to a shooting war, and it is the outdated, ill-informed government playbook that inflamed the situation and brought it to a flashpoint of violence. At every step, BLM escalated the situation beyond reason: who brings snipers to a tortoise dispute? Who unleashes attack dogs on unarmed pregnant women and cancer survivors? The BLM, that's who!
I know there remain many good agents in many different departments of the federal government. But there are also many incompetent agents who are still living in the 1990's and think they can run an armed ranch siege in 2014 the same way the ATF ran the Waco, Texas siege in 1993. But the rules have changed. As proof of that, consider the now-historical fact that BLM agents publicly surrendered and retreated from hundreds of armed citizens near Bunkerville, Nevada. How did this happen, exactly? To understand that, you must understand the new rules of engagement between the feds, the media and the citizens.
So if you have any friends who are feds in any department -- BLM, ATF, DEA, FBI, etc. -- make sure they get a copy of this article... and we all might spare ourselves some bloodshed in the near future.
More with video @ Natural News
Rule #5) You will only have the cooperation of the People by their choice, not by coercion.
ReplyDeleteNewsflash: The Feral Govt. doesn't give a hoot about our cooperation through free choice - that should be obvious. Coercion is the method of cowards, but that's who is running this country now. Provoking a massive resistance is what they want, but I do agree that they severely underestimate the outcome of such provocation.
Hopefully the pendulum reversed its travel at the Bundy Ranch and for good.
DeleteYes, I hope so - maybe this can be considered a 'drawing-the-fire' event to see how quickly there would be a Patriot response. Let's see what happens (or doesn't) in Texas.
ReplyDeleteMaybe the cavalry are prodding the lines.
DeleteWhen I, an overweight and out of shape 63 year old gave more than just passing thought to loading up and heading for the Bundy Ranch I have to believe that there
ReplyDeleteare thousands out there who are younger, better conditioned, better trained and more able who were thinking the same thing. I don't care how they try to divide us or how many "fires" they start around the country to distract us, any way you cut it "we the people" still outnumber them and I truly don't think their rank and file are dedicated to their cause.
They seemed to be impervious until they went one bridge too far at the Bundy Ranch.
DeleteMost excellent, posted..... ;)
ReplyDeleteThey should watch the movie Braveheart , ...... the scene where the people , unsolicited , come pouring out of the countryside ready to fight . In a place where the public has set fantastic weapon sales ......... do they really want to go there . W. Russell
ReplyDeleteLet us pray not.
Delete