By Mike Scruggs- Prussian General and military
theorist Carl von Clausewitz (1780-1831) insisted that any successful
theory of warfare had to balance what he called “the trinity of war.”
This concerned the motivation and morale affecting the people, the
government, and the Army. The support and will of all three had to be
mobilized to accomplish strategic objectives and victory.
Moreover,
successful military strategies should undermine the morale of the
enemy’s people, government, and Army.
The French did not withdraw from Indo-China solely
because of their defeat at the battle of Dien Bien Phu in 1954. They
withdrew because the French people were war weary from World War II and
Algeria, and the Communists had been relentless in exploiting this war
weariness by undermining the morale of the French people and Parliament.
It is a significant footnote in history that Marx, Engels, and Lenin
had studied Clausewitz’s 1831 unfinished work: On War, and incorporated
many of his principles, including “the trinity of war” in Communist
political and military doctrine. Mao also studied Clausewitz.
New academic theories of “limited war” and
“gradualism,” however, had begun to undermine the appreciation of
Clausewitz, military experience, and common sense during Robert
McNamara’s 1961-1968 tenure as U.S. Secretary of Defense. Military force
was not primarily for fighting and victory but “signaling” possible
threats of military escalation to the enemy.
More @ The Tribune
Like every war after WW II, there was no Congressional Declaration of War as demanded by the Constitution. Before committing American blood and treasure, there should be a clear reason of national defense, a named enemy and the objective to WIN and gain an unconditional surrender. A war should be declared by the nation's representatives and not by presidential warlords for "regime change", "democracy" , nation-building" or to use and abuse our military for globalism! Go
ReplyDeleteGod Bless the Republic--death to the New World Order. Ron W
God Bless the Republic--death to the New World Order.
DeleteAmen.
Harry Summers in "On Strategy" compares actions in Vietnam to Clausewitz's principles. Clausewitz would have been appalled. Summers attributes nearly all of the problems to the powers in Washington.
ReplyDeleteThanks and I have that also.
Delete