Red Flag laws violate the 4th and 5th Amendments, just as "universal background checks". Once upon a time, true liberals held those rights sacrosanct, but not for gun owners. Politicians like Rubio are reactionaries who fear the leftist media and politicians. Why didn't they focus on those who refused to enforce current laws which would have prevented a number of perps from buying??!!
Once Rubio pushes through another amensty they'll do far, far worse and evetually have the votes to change the Consitution and I fully expect them to do so.
I pray you are correct but my experience leads me to the conclusion that most will simply bury them or turn them in as ordered. Either way, the government gets what they want, unarmed subjects.
"When certain sovereign and independent states form a union with limited powers for some general purpose, and any one or more of them, in the progress of time, suffer unjust and oppressive grievances for which there is no redress but in a withdrawal from the association, is such withdrawal an insurrection? If so, then of what advantage is a compact of union to states? Within the Union are oppressions and grievances; the attempt to go out brings war and subjugation. The ambitious and aggressive states obtain possession of the central authority which, having grown strong in the lapse of time, asserts its entire sovereignty over the states.
Whichever of them denies it and seeks to retire is declared to be guilty of insurrection, its citizens are stigmatized as "rebels", as if they revolted against a master, and a war of subjugation is begun. If this action is once tolerated, where will it end? Where is constitutional liberty? What strength is there in bills of rights-in limitation of power? What new hope for mankind is to be found in written constitutions, what remedy which did not exist under kings of emperors? If the doctrines thus announced by the government of the United States are conceded, then look through either end of the political telescope, and one sees only an empire, and the once famous Declaration of Independence trodden in the dust of as a "glittering generality," and the compact of the union denounced as a "flaunting lie".
Those who submit to such consequence without resistance are not worthy the liberties and rights to which they were born, and deserve to be made slaves. Such must be the verdict of mankind."
Red Flag laws violate the 4th and 5th Amendments, just as "universal background checks". Once upon a time, true liberals held those rights sacrosanct, but not for gun owners. Politicians like Rubio are reactionaries who fear the leftist media and politicians. Why didn't they focus on those who refused to enforce current laws which would have prevented a number of perps from buying??!!
ReplyDelete--Ron W
. Why didn't they focus on those who refused to enforce current laws which would have prevented a number of perps from buying??!!
DeleteA novel thought to them, I'm sure.....:)
Little Marco is playing the "reelection game" like all politicians do regardless of their current political identity.
ReplyDeleteAs usual.
DeleteOnce Rubio pushes through another amensty they'll do far, far worse and evetually have the votes to change the Consitution and I fully expect them to do so.
ReplyDeleteDemographics ARE destiny.
Y'all have a nice day.
They can change it but getting guns turned in is another matter entirely.
DeleteI pray you are correct but my experience leads me to the conclusion that most will simply bury them or turn them in as ordered. Either way, the government gets what they want, unarmed subjects.
ReplyDeleteSadly, this ain't our dad's country.
Y'all have a nice day.
"When certain sovereign and independent states form a union with limited powers for some general purpose, and any one or more of them, in the progress of time, suffer unjust and oppressive grievances for which there is no redress but in a withdrawal from the association, is such withdrawal an insurrection? If so, then of what advantage is a compact of union to states? Within the Union are oppressions and grievances; the attempt to go out brings war and subjugation. The ambitious and aggressive states obtain possession of the central authority which, having grown strong in the lapse of time, asserts its entire sovereignty over the states.
DeleteWhichever of them denies it and seeks to retire is declared to be guilty of insurrection, its citizens are stigmatized as "rebels", as if they revolted against a master, and a war of subjugation is begun. If this action is once tolerated, where will it end? Where is constitutional liberty? What strength is there in bills of rights-in limitation of power? What new hope for mankind is to be found in written constitutions, what remedy which did not exist under kings of emperors? If the doctrines thus announced by the government of the United States are conceded, then look through either end of the political telescope, and one sees only an empire, and the once famous Declaration of Independence trodden in the dust of as a "glittering generality," and the compact of the union denounced as a "flaunting lie".
Those who submit to such consequence without resistance are not worthy the liberties and rights to which they were born, and deserve to be made slaves. Such must be the verdict of mankind."
--- President Jefferson Davis
Amen! and God Bless Jefferson Davis, a true patriot and God fearing man among men.
ReplyDeleteMay we yet again find God and the strength only He can provide. For He is the Author of the most precious gift of liberty.
Y'all have a nice day.
Amen!
DeleteYour article explains my vague thoughts very clearly
ReplyDeleteSuch an amazing and helpful post. I really really love it
ReplyDeleteIt’s really a great and helpful piece of information.
ReplyDeletePlease stay us informed like this. Thank you
ReplyDeleteIt is very well written, and your points are well-expressed.
ReplyDeleteThis website was… how do you say it? Relevant!!
ReplyDeleteThat was an excellent article.
ReplyDelete