Media outlets love reporting the results of polling on hot-button policy issues, but they rarely tell you if the people supporting proposed legislation (especially when it's restrictive) are the same people who would be affected by it. That matters in several important ways, not least of which is that getting a law passed is not the same thing as getting people to obey. Nowhere does that matter more than in the heated debate over gun laws.
More @ Reason
These politicians that support more gun control laws should set the example by doing away with their armed body guards first. It would make them all do a better job of representing the people that elected them.
ReplyDeleteBut if they are going to have guns protecting them everyone in America deserves to have the choice of the same protection.
But, but they're more important than us peons.......
DeleteI've been done with their BS for a long time now. If you want em, come and take em. Pass laws until you are blue in the face.🖕
ReplyDeleteCanada gave up after their edict which didn't result in much at all.
Delete"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and
ReplyDeletevoid." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)
"When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there
can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."
Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.
"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it
imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it
is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never
been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
Thanks, but you have to use logic and the commies don't have the word in their dictionaries......
DeleteThe insurance companies will be overwhelmed with "boating accident" claims.
ReplyDelete