Via
avordvet
In the aftermath of round one of the Bundy Ranch armed siege by the U.S.
government, I have decided to offer the federal government an
intelligent analysis of the new rules of engagement. People like Daniel
P. Love, Special Agent in Charge of BLM Region 3, desperately need to
review and learn these rules. Other federal agents also need to
understand the tectonic shift of power that has just taken place and how
it will impact their operations from here forward.
Why am I
doing this? Because the BLM, through its astounding incompetence and
arrogance, very nearly initiated a massacre at Bundy Ranch which would
have been disastrous for the BLM agents actively engaged there. The
incident very nearly came to a shooting war, and it is the outdated,
ill-informed government playbook that inflamed the situation and brought
it to a flashpoint of violence. At every step, BLM escalated the
situation beyond reason: who brings snipers to a tortoise dispute? Who
unleashes attack dogs on unarmed pregnant women and cancer survivors?
The BLM, that's who!
I know there remain many good agents in many
different departments of the federal government. But there are also
many incompetent agents who are still living in the 1990's and think
they can run an armed ranch siege in 2014 the same way the ATF ran the
Waco, Texas siege in 1993. But the rules have changed. As proof of that,
consider the now-historical fact that BLM agents
publicly surrendered and retreated from hundreds of armed citizens near Bunkerville, Nevada. How did this happen, exactly? To understand that, you must understand the
new rules of engagement between the feds, the media and the citizens.
So
if you have any friends who are feds in any department -- BLM, ATF,
DEA, FBI, etc. -- make sure they get a copy of this article... and we
all might spare ourselves some bloodshed in the near future.