Saturday, March 1, 2014

Supremes shoot down state's fight for gun rights


'It is fruitless to expect federal government to control the lust for tyrannical power'

Contending it is “fruitless” to expect that the federal government would rein in its own “lust” for tyranny, the instigator of a years-long conflict with Washington over the Interstate Commerce Clause says the battle is over.

At least for now.

Gary Marbut, president of the Montana Shooting Sports Association, said the lawsuit he and his organization brought to uphold the state’s rights on weapons will not be considered at the Supreme Court.

The court’s unwillingness to take the case leaves standing a decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that upheld a lower court’s decision to throw out the Montana Firearms Freedom Act.

The law states that firearms made and kept in Montana are exempt from federal regulation under the Commerce Clause, which gives the federal government authority to regulate commerce only “among” the states.

In a posting to supporters, Marbut wrote that the case is now at the end of the road, but a movement has been spawned.

More @ WND

10 comments:

  1. To the devil with SCROTUS. The Constitution was written so that any literate person can understand it. We don't need a government lawyer in a black nightgown, sitting in a highchair, to "interpret" it for us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. They are taking the wrong approach. If you have a right, you assume it and act accordingly. They need to proceed according to that right and make the Feds come in and stop them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe they will now since all other efforts have been in vain.

      Delete
  3. I wish all of the Red States would take a stand with them.

    ReplyDelete