Long
before the Fort Sumter collision at Charleston, efforts to avoid armed
conflict were pursued by the South to settle its differences with the
North and avoid bloodshed. From the Crittenden Compromise of late 1860
to the Confederate commissioners sent to Washington in March of 1861, to
the Hampton Roads Conference of February 1865, the Southern statesmen
worked diligently to both avert and end the war. There is no question
that as one reviews the timeline of peace initiatives and conferences
that one side wanted peace, and the other wanted war.
Bernhard Thuersam, Chairman
North Carolina War Between the States Sesquicentennial Commission
"Unsurpassed Valor, Courage and Devotion to Liberty"
"The Official Website of the North Carolina WBTS Sesquicentennial"
Manufactured Lies Passing as History
“After
all, President Coolidge’s first installment of our history to set off
Borglum’s group on a Western mountainside [Mt. Rushmore] did not please
the sculptor, and he wrote the history himself which is to be chiseled
in stone and go down the ages! Who can say that it was not least as
good as the ex-President’s?
At Gettysburg, on May 30,
President [Herbert] Hoover exhibited to a marked degree that strange
ignorance or that determined avoidance of the truth of history which we
see when a speaker has to place Abraham Lincoln in that niche which had
been fashioned for him by what Mr. Mencken calls “prostitute
historians,” and which has now been accepted by the North, by the world,
and even by the larger part of the South, which is both servile and
ignorant, and yet it is a niche which shames truth and degrades history!
[Hoover]
stated, in effect, that all the blood and horror and tears of the
“Civil” War might have been avoided had the people been possessed of the
human kindness and tolerance of Abraham Lincoln.
There
could scarcely have been fashioned a statement which would have done
more violence to the truth. The veriest tyro in history research must
know that Abraham Lincoln was a part of, and largely cooperated with,
that group which thought that “a little bloodletting will be good for
this nation.”
Everyone
not an ignoramus in Southern history must know that Lincoln opposed
sending delegates to that compromise or peace convention which might, at
the last moment, have devised some means for avoidance of the
holocaust. Everyone not determined to make a point at expense of truth
must know that Lincoln, secretly, determinedly, and almost alone, sent
that fleet of reinforcements and supplies to Fort Sumter, and thus, as
five of his cabinet had told him, brought on the war inevitably.
Lincoln
did much to inaugurate war, and there is no word of history which sets
forth the fact that he did any act or uttered any word which would have
avoided war, and yet, in a speech which was to reach the ears of the
world, President Hoover, at Gettysburg, makes the statement, totally
devoid of accuracy, that we might have avoided war had we been possessed
of the human kindness and tolerance of Abraham Lincoln, the man who
more than any other, or any group of others, is responsible, as worthy
historians now set forth, for the inauguration of four years of horror
in this country.
We
sometimes wonder if the Yankees do not get weary themselves of this
incessant round of prevarication, or are they so steeped in this false
history that they cannot see the truth. We know of many instances,
which have come directly to our knowledge, where they refuse the truth
when it is demonstrated to them. But are all of them that way?
Or
is it just a part of the price, this living lie, which we, as a
conquered people here in the South, must pay in order to establish the
truth of that time-old statement which sets forth that a conquered
people must have their history written by their conquerors, as has been
done since Ur of the Chaldees, and submit, gracefully or otherwise, to
the inevitable sequence of this, that our history shall be nothing but
manufactured lies.”
(Our History in High Places, Arthur H. Jennings, Past Historian in Chief, SCV, Confederate Veteran, July 1930, pp. 254-255)
"But are all of them that way?"
ReplyDeleteNO!!! But, we have to hear the truth - Were it not for Brock's blog, I would have remained in ignorance. Thank you from the bottom of my yankee pea pickin' heart !!!
:) Thank you honey chile'.
ReplyDeleteOur history was subverted as early as 1820. Lincoln's crimes just mass produced falsehoods at a much accelerated pace. It is somewhat consoling to know that he will suffer hell's fires again tomorrow. Burn, you bastard, burn!
ReplyDelete:)
DeleteI am a Yankee, but one who is willing to listen, read, and learn - then apply a little critical thinking. My mind has changed over the last 4-5 years and now Abraham Lincoln is at the top of my list of worst presidents in American history. Also, Generals Sherman, Sheridan, and Grant in my mind were murderers and destroyers of their American brethren. I will also add that throughout my life (not just recently), I have regarded Generals Lee and Sherman as true American heroes - Godly men - worthy of emulation. Not all Yankees believe the public school history books, but many yet need to hear the truth. Keep up the good work!
ReplyDeletePlain English
Thank you.
Delete