Friday, September 19, 2014

Russia cries foul over Scottish independence vote


Ballot boxes are opened as counting begins in the Scottish referendum in Aberdeen
"It is normally the sort of turnout you would expect in North Korea. (Or Vietnam.) Usually media here would go 'we don't believe it. How can it be nearly 90%?'". (Damn good question.)

Russia has said the conduct of the Scottish referendum "did not meet international standards", with its observers complaining the count took place in rooms that were too big and that the procedure was badly flawed.

More @ The Guardian

8 comments:

  1. I saw the video "evidence" and it's clearly propaganda. They show people moving yes votes into no votes stacks and so forth because they were in the wrong stacks. It's a dirty trick from the yes crowd. It has no effect on how they are counted. The machines are doing the final counting any way. The video showing no votes and yes votes in the wrong stacks is showing the external portion of the ballot that shows how to vote, not the actual vote check boxes selected by voters. They printed them with check "samples" on the outside of the ballots.

    Commie Russia is backing the Scottish Nationalist Party (which is 100% communist). They are pushing hard for a yes vote to divide and conquer the UK and the West in general. Russia wants to be able to invade the UK through the North (Scotland) via their North Pole bases in the future. It also will shutdown the UK's largest nuclear sub base which is in Scotland. It's war strategy all the way. Just look at a map of the region. It's obvious to any one with any common sense at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, no voter fraud couldn't happen there just like it doesn't happen here......

      ======

      Russia wants to be able to invade the UK through the North (Scotland) via their North Pole bases in the future.

      Well, that's a new one.

      ==============

      It's obvious to any one with any common sense at all.

      Of course, it' perfectly OK for us to circle Russia with our military bases, but not OK for them to try and counter them. I got it.

      Delete
    2. It could happen, but the "evidence" that Russia's "voting observers" are claiming proves fraud claims are BS. No doubt about it. Russia has no business even being there. It's none of their business. The fact they are there proves my point even further. Russia runs the Scottish Nationalist Party. They should change their name to Scottish Communist Party. Why else would Soviets have election observers present?

      It's a new one to us, but it's normal for Russia. They and their allies are really really working hard to get things in place for WW3. Strategically, Scotland is their best bet for a strike on the UK. Especially if ground forces are involved. People who don't realize this are not watching closely enough. Obama is helping them make their case to the world's stage. It gives Russia leverage it needs to start a conflict at a time when few in the West are prepared.

      Obama is "circling" Russia to give the illusion that the US is the aggressor. He's a puppet of communist oligarchs. Just like Snowden is nothing but an avatar of the Soviets to turn the world against the USA. Russia wants to be the global superpower and it will work with China and it's other allies to make sure it happens. Obama is the Manchurian candidate, the inside man. Until he is impeached, we're going under Soviet control and will not be able to do any thing about it on a scale large enough to stop the Soviet model from being completed.

      Delete
    3. You don't get 85%+ of the people voting except in Communist countries or if there is fraud.

      Delete
    4. Russian Nuclear Bombers Buzz Northern Europe

      http://freebeacon.com/national-security/russian-nuclear-bombers-buzz-northern-europe/

      Delete
    5. Alaska was previous, but EU seems new. Thanks.

      Delete
  2. Lock and load boys...Putrid is getting itchy fingers

    http://motherboard.vice.com/read/cold-war-games-russias-ramping-up-its-military-presence-in-the-arctic

    ReplyDelete