Signed
into law by Woodrow Wilson with four gold pens on 23 December 1913, the
President remarked that the controversial Federal Reserve “measure had
suffered many narrow escapes” before reaching his desk. Bernhard
Thuersam
The Soundest Fiat Money Ever Issued
“On
the floor of the Senate the [Federal Reserve] bill encountered heavy
opposition. Senator Elihu Root, of New York, led the attack. His
remarks were bitter and persistent. Such was Root’s standing that his
assaults attracted much attention. The vehement antagonism of Senator
Root was based on the charge that inflation and “fiat” money were at the
center of the proposed system.
“The
American people,” he argued, “closed the case for and against inflation
. . . when they sustained the vote of the inflation bill by President
Grant in 1874. Coming into power, the Democratic party undertakes to
reserve the oft-repeated judgment of the people of the united States
upon this question. We are setting our steps now in the pathway which
through the protection of a paternal government brought the mighty power
of Rome to its fall. And we are doing it here without a mandate from
the people of the United States.”
Defenders
of the bill admitted that it was true that the Federal Reserve note was
not, strictly speaking, a “Government” note, but contended that it was
quite obvious that it was not “fiat” money. On the contrary, it was a
sound bank note, secured by a forty percent gold reserve, a lien on the
issuing bank and its stock, and by the Federal Government itself. There
was little or no need for the Government obligation, it was held, but
for the sake of safety and William Jennings Bryan, it was there.
The
Senate paid little attention to the admonition of Senator Root. In
fact, it actually enlarged the inflationary features of the bill.
[They] deplored the fact that a statesman of Senator Root’s
international reputation should have seized upon a politician’s catch
phrase and denounced as “fiat” money the soundest note ever issued.”
(Carter Glass, Unreconstructed Rebel, James E. Palmer, Jr., Institute of American Biography, 1938, pp. 100-102)
Absolutely amazing, that (tptb) saw fit to remove this civic/economics history from the educational course curriculum.... Of course we damned well know why!
ReplyDeleteOf course we damned well know why!
Delete:) !