Either of Your Senators Could Determine Whether Anti-gun Loretta Lynch Gets Confirmed
Not a GOA member yet? Make sure to join Gun Owners of America!
ACTION: Contact your two Senators.
Urge them to commit to you to be THE SENATOR who will challenge any
ruling of the chair allowing Lynch to pass on the basis of fewer than 60
votes.
Last chance to defeat Lynch; Senate vote coming soon!
Your
Senators can determine whether Schumer-protégé and anti-gun loon
Loretta Lynch is confirmed as Attorney General of the United States.
They can determine whether Lynch will be given the opportunity to use her position to ban semi-autos by executive fiat.
They can determine whether Lynch becomes the fifth-antigun-vote-in- waiting for the Supreme Court -- poised to overturn Heller and McDonal d when Antonin Scalia's or Anthony Kennedy's seat becomes vacant.
And,
they can determine whether the lawless Obama and his chorus of anti-gun
press acolytes does another victory dance over the lifeless corpse of
the increasingly feckless Senate GOP.
Why
does it come down to your two Senators? Because any Senator
can determine whether the Senate votes on whether to abide by its
rules requiring 60 votes to break a filibuster of Lynch.
And Lynch does not have 60 votes.
Here's
the deal: Rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate requires 60
votes to break the expected filibuster of the Lynch nomination.
Now,
former Majority Leader Harry Reid has, repeatedly, scheduled fraudulent
votes where the Senate "passed" nominees who didn't have 60 votes.
This fraudulent maneuver, called "the nuclear option," was nothing but a
cheat-scheme.
But
here's the problem: You can race your car up and down at 80 miles an
hour as many times as you want. But that doesn't mean the speed limit
goes away -- just because you violate it.
Similarly,
the Senate rules requiring 60 votes for Lynch have not disappeared,
simply because the lawless Harry Reid has repeated spat on them.
But
the Senate rules are not going to enforce themselves. We need either
one of your U.S. Senators to challenge any unlawful ruling by the Senate
president that claims to shut down a filibuster of Lynch with fewer
than the required 60 votes.
And
they may be the only ones who are willing to do that. But, if they do,
our bet is that not a whole lot of Republicans are willing to re-affirm
Reid's vile nuclear precedent -- and, in the process, cast the deciding
votes to confirm the hated and anti-gun Lynch.
ACTION: Contact your two Senators.
Urge them to commit to you to be THE SENATOR who will challenge any
ruling of the chair allowing Lynch to pass on the basis of fewer than 60
votes.
"Either of Your Senators Could Determine Whether Anti-gun Loretta Lynch Gets Confirmed "
ReplyDeleteNot in Kommiefornia.
Hbbill
Somewhere behind enemy lines,
Peoples Republik of Kommiefornia
Pick up a rifle and you change instantly from a subject to a citizen.—Col. Jeff Cooper
Really, sad to say.
DeleteContacting senator's won't make any difference.
ReplyDeleteThe lynch confirmation is already a done deal.
It was guaranteed when traitorous shitbags
made the backroom deal where dem's agreed to
support letting no abortion funding remain in
the human trafficking bill, in return for "republican's"
guaranteeing the votes (and subservience) needed to
easily confirm lynch as attorney general.
It's nothing but criminal and treasonous game: outgoing AG, a
communist black male, incoming AG, a communist black female.
Once again, republican's have sold out their supporters on
the auction block again.
By the way, it passed unopposed, 99-0.
ReplyDeletePure, unadulterated crap.
DeleteYEAs 56
ReplyDeleteNAYs 43
Not Voting 1 Cruz
Another sad day for America.
At least the two Tarheels voted correctly.
Delete"By the way, it passed unopposed, 99-0."
DeleteThis is the vote tally for the human trafficking bill.
Those numbers prove their was a backroom deal.
Moreover, it reveals that even those supposed
"republicans" who voted no on the lynch confirmation
are guilty and treasonous shitbags, as they participated
in the bipartisan treason of not revealing the backroom crime.
The entire senate enabled the crime, some sooner, others later.
it reveals that even those supposed "republicans" who voted no on the lynch confirmation are guilty and treasonous shitbags, as they participated
Deletein the bipartisan treason of not revealing the backroom crime.
I was curious about that. Thanks.
I just know Ron Paul would have been a Nay!
ReplyDeleteMr. No. :)
DeleteThis appointment along with rat face Holder's were never meant to be.
ReplyDeleteThe black's political ineptitude, never rises above the tribal concept.
Death to Communism! :)
Delete