Tuesday, October 11, 2016

The New York Times Calls For Obama To Support A UN Resolution That Would Divide The Land Of Israel

Via Billy 


While most Americans are focused on the endless circus surrounding Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, a drama of earth-shattering importance is playing out behind the scenes. Most people seem to assume that we don’t have to be concerned about Barack Obama anymore because his second term is scheduled to end in a few months, but the truth is that an absolutely critical decision is in his hands right now. Both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have said that they will not support a proposed UN Security Council resolution that would formally establish a Palestinian state, that would set the parameters for the new state, and that would grant them East Jerusalem as their capital.

So at this moment there is a tremendous amount of international pressure on Barack Obama to support such a resolution, because the U.S. veto power on the UN Security Council is the only thing standing in the way of formally dividing the land of Israel. I wrote about this in August, in September, and now I am writing about it again in October. If Obama is going to do this, it needs to happen by January 20th, 2017, and so for the next few months we are officially in “the danger zone.”

On Thursday, the New York Times editorial board added their voice to the growing chorus of those calling for a “parameters resolution” in a piece entitled “At the Boiling Point With Israel“…


  1. Since Isreal doesn't "belong" to the UN, what the UN resolves or fails to resolve has no consequence. The Palestinians already believe they have an independent state. Most Arab nations act as if they do. Nothing will change.

  2. Jerusalem is mentioned in the Bible 767 times. It is the only city on Earth which Jehovah Elohim claims as His city and the one upon which he puts His Name.

    And unto his son will I give one tribe, that David My servant may have a light alway before Me in Jerusalem, the city which I have chosen Me to put My Name there. --I KIngs11:36

    Woe be unto the arrogant ones who deign to divide the City of God!

  3. Mr Benjamin Freedman, a Jewish industrialist born in New York, wrote in the Economic Council Letter published there of October 15 1947: "These Eastern European Jews have neither a racial nor a historic connection with Palestine. Their ancestors were not inhabitants of the Promised Land. They are the direct descendants of the people of the Khazar Kingdom.. The Khazars were a non-semitic, Turko-Mongolian tribe."
    The UN had no authority to give land which belonged to
    somebody else to somebody else. Like barefootsworld stated,
    the UN is a terrorist organization.

    1. You're welcome. The Tyrant Lincoln had no authority to invade the South also.......

  4. Yet now, in most supposed enlightened political discourse, Lincoln's UNLAWFUL actions without delegated powers is viewed as settled law whereby "free and Indpendent States" are the vassals of a lawless, renegade federal government.