Saturday, December 10, 2016

Oath Keepers Opposes Anti-Gun Activist David Petraeus for Secretary of State

Via Billy


Just Say “No!” to General “Betrayus,” an Oath Breaker and Enemy of the Right to Bear Arms.  Mr. Trump, if you really want to make America great again, make America CONSTITUTIONAL again.

Retired General and former CIA Director David Petraeus is a bad choice for Secretary of State, Oath Keepers advised President-Elect Donald Trump, strongly supporting a call to action initiated by Gun Owners of America.  In addition to “mishandling” classified information and sharing it with his mistress (he avoided felony charges, prison time and “prohibited person” status against owning firearms by pleading guilty to a misdemeanor),  Petraeus’ advocacy of infringements on the right to keep and bear arms effectively renounces the obligation he freely took when he swore an oath to “support and defend the Constitution…”

Petraeus turned his back on that oath when he joined with retired Gen. Stanley McChrystal and other veterans to form “The Veterans Coalition for Common Sense.” The group is part of retired Captain Mark Kelly’s and Gabby Gifford’s “Americans for Responsible Solutions,” which posted a list of all the military notables lending their names to the effort.  By doing so, they’re disregarding the paramount importance of civilian control of the military, and are presuming to overturn the Founders’ judgment about what was and is “necessary to the security of a free State” – a militia of the people, well armed.

As Founding Father Tench Coxe described it:


  1. Congress nor the Senate or States cannot write state nor federal laws that regulate, restrict or suspend any of our Constitutional Protections.........

    "No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16 Am Jur 2nd, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256

    What this means is this....Any regulations and restrictions to our owning firearms are absolutely UNCONSTITUTIONAL...
    They are Illegal.


    Further More...........

    The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for a law which violates the Constitution to be valid. This is succinctly stated as follows:

    "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and
    void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)

    "When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there
    can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."
    Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.

    "An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it
    imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442

    An ACT, LAW, STATUTE, nor a DECREE cannot suspend our 2cd amendment constitutional protections to freely bear arms.

    Background checks, laws or statutes forbidding the sale of firearms to felons are absolutely unconstitutional....

    There are roughly 69 million conservative gun owners and our not uniting to stop this is unconstitutional attack on our Natural rights is just unconscionable...They'll expand on this law just as they did with the National Firearms Act of 1934 and the 1968 Gun Control act signed by Johnson....

    These laws are meant to disarm Citizens, not criminals...

    This man has no right serving in a Constitutional capacity, when he is not complying to its protections.

    1. These laws are meant to disarm Citizens, not criminals...

      This man has no right serving in a Constitutional capacity, when he is not complying to its protections.

      Absolutely and let us hope that his gets bypassed as
      Romney did.