Monday, October 9, 2017

The 2nd Amendment is special, not because it protects guns, but because its violation signals a government with the intention to oppress its people.

 https://i.pinimg.com/236x/dc/2c/c9/dc2cc98ee8d21a8b6fb3c6dbba2732e2--thomas-jefferson-quotes-glock-guns.jpg

Here is the danger with the second amendment debate at this point in time, there are no good advocates, who truly understand the issues at hand. Over at the National Review we have some half-spineless humanoid making the argument for an armed citizenry resisting government tyranny. His writing is half-hearted and apologetic about supporting the view that, yes, a determined minority of gun owners could dispel a tyrannical government.

That doesn't help, in fact it undermines the whole concept of the Second Amendment. We really don't need some guy who sounds like he would be frightened at the sight of a 1911 laying on the table to argue the merits and utility of the Second Amendment. It was as if the duty had fallen to him, but that he didn't really buy any of it or support anything about it. Hey, National Review, maybe hire a competent writer with knowledge of the issues rather than pick on some spineless dolt to do the work.

The Second Amendment was never written to enable a sport like hunting or target shooting; it was written and understood from a deadly serious point of view about the security and nature of a free state. It was written to debilitate a tyrannical government and keep it in check until it could be overthrown. Nothing that has transpired in the 20th or 21st Centuries so far has refuted the utility or importance of the Second Amendment.

1 comment:

  1. Hi Brock,
    'Caught this over at "TL's place".... Well said.. solid.. posted to my "faceplant page" to see what kind of "fish" I catch?? Ya' never know?? I'l keep you posted....
    skybill

    ReplyDelete