correction/clarification: yours, not ours. BTW, an "assault weapon" is any thing we say it is and the definition is subject to change and situation.
With this statement, we should ban all communists, democrats, and muslims, yes?
Nothing but a go for it here!
I don't any weapons that are capable of "Assault". All of mine are modular sporting weapons used for self defense.
:)Yes and my KOMRAD and AK are my squirrel hunting guns.....:)
During the Obama Administration, I read a report that DHS had purchased 7000 "personal self defense rifles". They were "select-fire" which means capable of full-auto fire which, presumably would be for the tactic of offensive assault. The rifles they want to ban for us are all semi-auto rifles which are very suitable for self defense. That's precisely why mine are "necessary" to me. So in our hands, semi-auto self defense rifles are "assault weapons" and, in hired government hands, full-auto rifles suitable for offensive assault are "personal self defense rifles".As usual, in the current Democratic House bill banning assault weapons, they EXEMPT THEMSELVES, that is, government officials and agents, federal, state and local down to campus police, even retirees. AND, get this, they EXEMPT private security companies, so that the wealthy elite class, many of whom are leftist who support disarming us, will still have armed security with those banned weapons FOR THEMSELVES. Yet, these are the same people who constantly repeated the mantra, "the rule of law" and "no one is above the law"!! Yet they flagrantly VIOLATE that and "the equal protection toon if the laws" in the 14th Amendment, one of the two which overturned the 1857 SCOTUS Dred Scott decision to end slavery and equal justice of the law FOR EVERYONE.Furthermore, there is NO delegated power for any gun control laws PERTAINING TO THE PEOPLE in the Constitution, but only "for governing such part of them as are EMPLOYED IN ITS SERVICE." (Article I, Section 8.16). "Such part of them" in the immediate context from clause 15 refers to the militia. The militia is the armed citizenry. That's why the 2nd Amendment sentence grammatically begins with the subordinate clause with, "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a Free State". "Militia" in that clause must agree with "the People" in the main clause, or else it is contradictory and non-sensicle. It, along with the rest if the Bill of Rights were added in 1791 and references Artcile I, Section 8.15-16, the delegated power by which the Federal Government is restricted to governing only such part of the armed citizens which is EMPLOYED IN ITS SERVICE. The 10th Amendment makes this very clear that the Federal Government may lawfully do NOTHING without delegated power from the States and the People. Therefore, ALL gun laws pertaining to the People are unconstitutional and UNLAWFUL. So yes, I agree with their mantra, "the rule of law" and "no one is above the law"!! --Ron W
So in our hands, semi-auto self defense rifles are "assault weapons" and, in hired government hands, full-auto rifles suitable for offensive assault are "personal self defense rifles".Should be a MAD magazine story. :)Thanks.