Friday, June 11, 2021

War was Lincoln’s Choice


 A wonderful book in my library and see the hardback is $550 now.

Circa 1865

President James Buchanan disagreed with secession as the prerogative of a State, but admitted that he as president held no authority to levy war to stop it — and his attorney general concurred. Both were well-aware of Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying was against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” Buchanan could not use military force against a State without committing treason.

“The States of the deep South dissolved their connection with the voluntary union of the United States with marked legality at the beginning of 1861. For a quarter of a year no one knew that there was to be a war. Then Lincoln (unauthorized by the Constitution) called for troops; and the upper South, led by Virginia, seceded.

The point is, Lincoln could have chosen to let the South go in peace on the grounds that a just government depends on the consent of the governed, and the Southern States had withdrawn that consent.

But, said the North, the majority do consent, since there are more people in the North. Even if most of the people in the South do not consent, we in the North are the majority of the whole nation. Thus, the rights of a minority, although a minority of millions, mean nothing.

This is precisely what [Alexis] de Tocqueville warned against: the tyranny of the majority. And Lord Acton was deeply convinced that the principle of States’ rights was the best limitation upon the tyranny of the majority that had ever been devised.

Thus Lee did represent the cause of freedom, and Lord Acton broke his heart over Lee’s surrender because the principle of States’ rights was finally and forever denied.

The America of today is the America that won that immense triumph in the war – the triumph of unlimited, equalitarian democracy. And its leaders have blurred the distinction between freedom and equality to the point where many people use those words as virtually interchangeable terms.”

(The Glittering Illusion: English Sympathy for the Southern Confederacy, Sheldon Vanauken, Regnery Gateway, 1989, excerpt pg. 142)

2 comments:

  1. http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/benton/calhoun_340113.html

    During the war of 1812-15, withdrawal from the voluntary union was accepted as fact. In 1834 president Andrew Jackson put damper on State rights.

    Not one of those who ratified the constitution would have signed onto it if it had been hinted that it is a perpetual union.

    Has anyone traced the development of the concept that the Union is a religious item, eternal and sacrosanct ?

    ____________________
    If the book is truely rare (not just jacked-up to $550.00 by criminals on Amazon) prepare it for publication on Lulu, and have for $27.00 (including shipping).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. :)

      Not one of those who ratified the constitution would have signed onto it if it had been hinted that it is a perpetual union.

      100%.

      It is only the edition pictured above in hardback which is $550. There is another edition which is $36 in hardback
      Thanks.
      https://www.amazon.com/Glittering-Illusion-Sympathy-Southern-Confederacy/dp/0895265524

      Delete