Tuesday, July 5, 2016

FBI Rewrites Federal Law to Let Hillary Off the Hook

Via David

 http://matzav.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/HILLARY-696x522.jpg

There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine), Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18):

With lawful access to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust. Director Comey even conceded that former Secretary Clinton was “extremely careless” and strongly suggested that her recklessness very likely led to communications (her own and those she corresponded with) being intercepted by foreign intelligence services. Yet, Director Comey recommended against prosecution of the law violations he clearly found on the ground that there was no intent to harm the United States.

In essence, in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote the statute, inserting an intent element that Congress did not require. The added intent element, moreover, makes no sense: The point of having a statute that criminalizes gross negligence is to underscore that government officials have a special obligation to safeguard national defense secrets; when they fail to carry out that obligation due to gross negligence, they are guilty of serious wrongdoing. The lack of intent to harm our country is irrelevant. People never intend the bad things that happen due to gross negligence.

10 comments:

  1. The Clinton worms have been breaking the law since the 80's
    and getting away with it. There is no longer a Rule of Law
    and the Rule of Law was created for the gov.
    This is how politics in America works today. People like Bill and Hillary Clinton could openly sacrifice children to Satan on the White House lawn and still probably not get into trouble. Despite scandal after scandal going all the way back to Arkansas in the 1980s, nothing ever sticks to them, and nothing probably ever will. But, I know what
    WILL stick to them........
    At this moment, she has solid leads in all of the swing states , and she only really needs to win one of them. Perhaps you enjoy talk of battleground states. Well, there s a scenario for you, too. First, pick the six closest swing states (VA, NH, IA, OH, FL, NC). Got it? Now understand that New Hampshire excepted, Clinton only has to win one of them in order to reach the requisite 270 electoral votes to win. The people have been screwed again by our slaves.
    The deck is stacked against the people who made the gov.
    Obama, Lurch, Comey all had a hand. The crimes Clinton
    committed are felonies. I hope this verdict is challenged.
    Sad day for America.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A long row to hoe, unfortunately, but we have to try our most. Thanks.

      Delete
  2. You know, that scag face Ryan was on Fox, Megyn, putting on
    a big 'indignant stance' regarding Comey's verdict. Here
    he is on the other side of the bush. What a typical weasel:
    http://www.vdare.com/articles/face-it-these-rats-republicans-against-trump-are-traitors-to-the-party-and-to-america

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks.http://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2016/07/face-it-these-rats-republicans-against.html

      Delete
  3. Intent? Try that line and see how well that will work for you. I am sure that a State Patrol Officer, will get a nice laugh from it; "Sure I was speeding when you pulled me over. But, I did not intend to speed, therefore you should let me go with a warning and not a ticket."

    ReplyDelete
  4. "the FBI rewrote the statute,"

    "Administrative Law" is a huge part of what is wrong these days with state and federal governments. We have agencies writing and enforcing GUIDELINES as law when in actuality, these "laws" are null, void, and illegal. Thses are bureaucrats who were hired (not elected) to do a job. They have been given this power by legislators who obviously are ignorant of or choose to ignore the U.S. and state constitutions. These agencies in turn dictate directives as law. Also, in many instances, they have been given the power to enforce these illegal "laws", seize property, levy fines, and incarcerate "violators". The citizen does not have civil recourse as these "employees" are hired and not elected. It is as wrong and it will not stand. Sooner or later people are going to grow tired of being ignored when they use the "ballot box" and the citizens are going to vote via "the cartridge box"

    ReplyDelete
  5. "the FBI rewrote the statute,"

    "Administrative Law" is a huge part of what is wrong these days with state and federal governments. We have agencies writing and enforcing GUIDELINES as law when in actuality, these "laws" are null, void, and illegal. Thses are bureaucrats who were hired (not elected) to do a job. They have been given this power by legislators who obviously are ignorant of or choose to ignore the U.S. and state constitutions. These agencies in turn dictate directives as law. Also, in many instances, they have been given the power to enforce these illegal "laws", seize property, levy fines, and incarcerate "violators". The citizen does not have civil recourse as these "employees" are hired and not elected. It is as wrong and it will not stand. Sooner or later people are going to grow tired of being ignored when they use the "ballot box" and the citizens are going to vote via "the cartridge box"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sooner or later people are going to grow tired of being ignored when they use the "ballot box" and the citizens are going to vote via "the cartridge box"

      No question about it.

      Delete