There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine), Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18):
With lawful access
to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in
removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of
custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to
others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust.
Director Comey even conceded that former Secretary Clinton was
“extremely careless” and strongly suggested that her recklessness very
likely led to communications (her own and those she corresponded with)
being intercepted by foreign intelligence services.
Yet, Director Comey recommended against prosecution of the law
violations he clearly found on the ground that there was no intent to
harm the United States.
In essence, in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote
the statute, inserting an intent element that Congress did not require.
The added intent element, moreover, makes no sense: The point of having a
statute that criminalizes gross negligence is to underscore that
government officials have a special obligation to safeguard national
defense secrets; when they fail to carry out that obligation due to
gross negligence, they are guilty of serious wrongdoing. The lack of
intent to harm our country is irrelevant. People never intend the bad
things that happen due to gross negligence.
More @ National Review
The Clinton worms have been breaking the law since the 80's
ReplyDeleteand getting away with it. There is no longer a Rule of Law
and the Rule of Law was created for the gov.
This is how politics in America works today. People like Bill and Hillary Clinton could openly sacrifice children to Satan on the White House lawn and still probably not get into trouble. Despite scandal after scandal going all the way back to Arkansas in the 1980s, nothing ever sticks to them, and nothing probably ever will. But, I know what
WILL stick to them........
At this moment, she has solid leads in all of the swing states , and she only really needs to win one of them. Perhaps you enjoy talk of battleground states. Well, there s a scenario for you, too. First, pick the six closest swing states (VA, NH, IA, OH, FL, NC). Got it? Now understand that New Hampshire excepted, Clinton only has to win one of them in order to reach the requisite 270 electoral votes to win. The people have been screwed again by our slaves.
The deck is stacked against the people who made the gov.
Obama, Lurch, Comey all had a hand. The crimes Clinton
committed are felonies. I hope this verdict is challenged.
Sad day for America.
A long row to hoe, unfortunately, but we have to try our most. Thanks.
DeleteYou know, that scag face Ryan was on Fox, Megyn, putting on
ReplyDeletea big 'indignant stance' regarding Comey's verdict. Here
he is on the other side of the bush. What a typical weasel:
http://www.vdare.com/articles/face-it-these-rats-republicans-against-trump-are-traitors-to-the-party-and-to-america
Thanks.http://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2016/07/face-it-these-rats-republicans-against.html
DeleteIntent? Try that line and see how well that will work for you. I am sure that a State Patrol Officer, will get a nice laugh from it; "Sure I was speeding when you pulled me over. But, I did not intend to speed, therefore you should let me go with a warning and not a ticket."
ReplyDelete"the FBI rewrote the statute,"
ReplyDelete"Administrative Law" is a huge part of what is wrong these days with state and federal governments. We have agencies writing and enforcing GUIDELINES as law when in actuality, these "laws" are null, void, and illegal. Thses are bureaucrats who were hired (not elected) to do a job. They have been given this power by legislators who obviously are ignorant of or choose to ignore the U.S. and state constitutions. These agencies in turn dictate directives as law. Also, in many instances, they have been given the power to enforce these illegal "laws", seize property, levy fines, and incarcerate "violators". The citizen does not have civil recourse as these "employees" are hired and not elected. It is as wrong and it will not stand. Sooner or later people are going to grow tired of being ignored when they use the "ballot box" and the citizens are going to vote via "the cartridge box"
Yes and well overdue.
Delete"the FBI rewrote the statute,"
ReplyDelete"Administrative Law" is a huge part of what is wrong these days with state and federal governments. We have agencies writing and enforcing GUIDELINES as law when in actuality, these "laws" are null, void, and illegal. Thses are bureaucrats who were hired (not elected) to do a job. They have been given this power by legislators who obviously are ignorant of or choose to ignore the U.S. and state constitutions. These agencies in turn dictate directives as law. Also, in many instances, they have been given the power to enforce these illegal "laws", seize property, levy fines, and incarcerate "violators". The citizen does not have civil recourse as these "employees" are hired and not elected. It is as wrong and it will not stand. Sooner or later people are going to grow tired of being ignored when they use the "ballot box" and the citizens are going to vote via "the cartridge box"
Sooner or later people are going to grow tired of being ignored when they use the "ballot box" and the citizens are going to vote via "the cartridge box"
DeleteNo question about it.