Showing posts sorted by relevance for query yeagley. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query yeagley. Sort by date Show all posts

Saturday, March 22, 2014

An American patriot has died: Dr. David A. Yeagley (1951-2014)

Via Susan

 David Yeagley



******************************

 One week ago today, America lost one of its most devoted patriots.

He was a native son of this land in a way which most of us could never be. Nonetheless, he despised the term “Native American”, instead preferring one ordained by the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution: “American Indian”.

Indeed, those two words describe Dr. David A. Yeagley to a tee. The great-great-grandson of Comanche dignitary Bad Eagle, Dr. Yeagley lived his life with one foot firmly, and proudly, planted in the past, another in the present, and both eyes focused on the future.

Most well known for outspoken rightist political commentary, Dr. Yeagley’s career was far more varied than some know. The San Diego Jewish World dubbed him “an American Indian Leonardo da Vinci” in an article about his Holocaust-related classical music compositions.

Dr. Yeagley also found prominence as an author of fiction and nonfiction literature, totaling eight published books which touched on subjects ranging from Iran’s displaced Pahlavi dynasty to Christian theology. Not one to leave stones unturned, he became involved with the film industry and made history as our nation’s first American Indian motion picture composer.

None of this even begins to touch on his work as a humanities and literature professor or, of all things, portrait painter.

More @ CDN

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Friends of Bad Eagle


 David Yeagley
 David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle.
 

Dear Friends of Bad Eagle,

On behalf of the Yeagley family, I am sorry to inform you that David passed away early yesterday morning, March 11, 2014.

We await the glorious resurrection when we shall see him again.

A memorial service is planned for Friday, March 14 at 3:00 pm at Oklahoma City Central Seventh-day Adventist Church located at 4747 NW 63rd St.

The family plans to hold a second memorial service in Oklahoma City in the future, details to be posted at a later date.

Messages for the family may be posted online via the Chapel Hill Funeral Home website:

More @ Bad Eagle

*****************************

http://www.badeagle.com/badeagle/YeaWayne2.jpg


It’s A Warrior Thing. You Wouldn’t Understand.

WE INDIANS are supposed to hate the white man. Everyone tells me this. I’ve heard it from whites, blacks and even from Indians. Well, folks, I hate to disappoint you, but I like white people just fine.

To tell the truth, I rather admire them and their fascinating history. Oh, I know what you’re thinking. "Yeagley! How can you say that? How can you admire a people who slaughtered your ancestors, gave smallpox to those left alive, herded them onto reservations, made them all drunks, and as the final indignity sold their turquoise mines to the Japanese?" Well, the way I figure it, anyone who could whip our Indian behinds like the white man did deserves our highest respect. And anyone who can whip a Comanche (my tribe) deserves the Medal of Honor. I admire a man who can beat me. I dare say, deep inside all Indians at least those who are still warriors at heart there is a special admiration for the white man. 


More articles @  David Yeagley

Monday, August 31, 2015

The Real Racist Problem Behind Illegal Immigration by David Yeagley 2005

Via comment by Sioux on Europe starts getting serious

David Yeagley
David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. - See more at: http://www.badeagle.com/2005/06/03/the-real-racist-problem-behind-illegal-immigration/#sthash.RwILW0wf.dpuf
 David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
 
 A true Confederate, Indian Patriot and may he RIP.

******************

Most Americans think of Mexicans as short and dark, despite the fact that Mexican President Vicente Fox is tall and white. So what really is a Mexican, and who is in charge of Mexico? Americans are getting a confused picture, while illegal immigration is rampant, with all its attendant ills. Americans see hordes of swarthy, illiterate workers, yet American media flaunts a “white,” professional Mexican, as president. The reality is the white upperclass really does rule Mexico. Their chauvinism – and the lack of patriotism shown by most of the Mexican population – has helped create America’s illegal immigration problem.

More @ Bad Eagle

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

DAVID YEAGLEY RIP: American Indian/ Patriot/Confederate

David Yeagley 

Bad Eagle

Liberty has lost a true friend.
David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. - See more at: http://www.badeagle.com/about_david_yeagley/#sthash.GTjhy9k9.dpuf

Thursday, July 7, 2011

A Call for Attorneys: The Law and BadEagle.com

LINK

VERBATIM POST
===========================

BadEagle.com has enemies. The proprietor, Dr. David A. Yeagley, has earned a good deal of opposition. Some of it is independent malice from individuals; some of it is inevitable cooperation of the internet itself, and the corporate entities operating there in. (I wouldn’t want to flatter myself that I have drawn so grand and awesome opposition because I was so very important that I must be opposed so magnificently.)

I am an American Indian, a member of the Comanche Nation. I happen to be an American patriot. This seems untenable, unacceptable, and intolerable to my opponents. To undo my “influence,” their basic manoeuver has been simply to claim that I am not Indian. They have used the internet quite effectively to this end, and they have used newspapers. They have also used a university press and a hard copy book published thereby.


Dr. David A. Yeagley, Comanche. Photo
by SKY, 2008.

The only reasonable thing for me to do was to file a suit against them. There were a variety of torts, but the focus became libel. I began to search for an attorney. My main problem, of course, was the fact that I did not have any resources, financial or otherwise. In the state of Oklahoma, I searched for an attorney for nearly two years. I managed to get a few “legal” letters written (at enormous cost) before any filing occurred. But I was unable to find anyone to commit. I searched also at a national level for an attorney willing to take such a case. Pro bono was probably the chief inhibition, to say nothing of the fact that Oklahoma attorneys are not particularly versed in libel, nor were there any willing to take on such corporations as Los Angeles Times, Google, Amazon.com, or the University of Nebraska.

It took nearly two years, but I finally found an attorney, who, for a retainer, would take the case. His name: Edward F. Saheb, and Iranian American with an office in Norman, Oklahoma. He was recommended to me by a very dear friend of mine, also Iranian American. Mr. Saheb had the nerve, the chutzpah, and the sense of initiative. I borrowed the money for a retainer, and the suit was filed November 4, 2009.

Since then, there have been a number of case manoeuvers and the progress has obviously been very slow. But the manoeuvers will continue, certainly. Two default judgments have been granted in our favor, but we are not yet certain of the terms and damages yet.

What we need is more manpower, basically. To sue a corporation that is able to buy the best defense attorneys available is an overwhelming assignment for one man, Mr. Saheb. The amount of research required, case law studied, and responses drawn up, is beyond intimidating. Although the libel against me was started apparently by individuals, it came to involved major corporations in support. We must be able to meet the challenges of the corporations as well as the individuals.

For instance, one Al Carroll started out by using my personal name for his “hate” site against me: DavidYeagley.org. He published his libel there. Eventually, he got his libel against me published in a hard copy book. The University of Nebraska released it in 2008. There is obviously a big difference between suing Al Carroll and suing the University of Nebraska.

By now, Google is featuring Al Carroll’s site at the top of the listings under “David Yeagley,” whether on the Google blog search, or the Google general search. Again, there is a big difference between suing Al Carroll and suing Google, Inc.

In the recent past (January, 2009), BadEagle.com has appealed for financial support of this case. It may be a better approach now to appeal for legal support in terms of manpower, or personnel, as in paralegals, and especially other attorneys.

This case is really of national, historical import. It has to do with the dignity and honor of being American Indian; with free speech; with trademarked names; with libel and malice; with tortious interference with contract; and even with identity theft. It has to do with the integrity of one man and the combined forces of a cadre of opponents and massive corporations in apparently intentional cooperation against me. An American Indian who is identified a conservative, Republican, American patriot, will not be allowed, so they intend. The powers that be are set to destroy him. This appears to be the situation.

As an American Indian, of course, I can easily demonstrate my identity, directly back to my ancestor, Bad Eagle (quin-ne kish-su-it), 1839-1909. Our family has all the records. I am willing to sacrifice means, to go to court, and to “prove” who I am. (Unlike the current president of the United States, who is willing to pay abundant means to “hide” who he is, to avoid any legal requirements,) I am proud of who I am, and am willing to demonstrate it. No, I never dreamed there could be such a question, or than anyone would have such an exotic notion as to deny my identity; yet, it seems the burden is on me to prove who I am. My opponents say I am not who I am. I say they should have to prove that. But, all they needed to to is to claim, in public, that I wasn’t. They didn’t sue me. But, I have to sue them.

The stigma of court will never die. The fact that I and my family was accused will never change. But, the very least I can hope for is public, legal justification. Therefore, I sued them.

At this point, I am anticipating an overwhelming task of taking on the corporations. When the case is passed the initial manoeuvers, the weight of responsibility will be inundating. We need the participation of other attorneys or legal aids, not just financial support.

Therefore, BadEagle.com appeals to all and any attorneys who are willing to offer time and effort to this prosecution. There are serious challenges to American values, and it will take great effort to defend the basic dignity of personhood and its inalienable rights.

If any firm or individual attorney is interested in our case, please contact me through this site. There will be major actions before this coming November, 2011. We need to be prepared.

Thank you for your consideration.

Saturday, August 24, 2013

In the Shadow of Death

Via John


David Yeagley

Good bye, brave son, we shall follow shortly.

Libertarian, Confederate, writer, composer and fighter.

See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand. Deuteronomy 32:39

This past spring (2013) I was diagnosed as having “low-grade, extra-nodal lymphoma.” In July, I was also diagnosed with mesothelioma. Two kinds of cancer, in the lungs. I had lung surgery on my left lung in July. I am presently on chemotherapy.

Most of my friends know that I have had cancer all my life, since I was eleven years old.

More @ Bad Eagle

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

What Happened to the Warrior’s Ethic?

Via comment by Anonymous on Confederate flag prompts school lockdown: Student 


David Yeagley

A good man who posted many Confederate pieces.  He left us way too soon and may you rest in peace, brave warrior.

Yankees respected Confederates. Why must we despise them today?
Back in 2006, my wife and I went to a friend’s house to watch Oscar De La Hoya fight Ricardo Mayorga for the World Boxing Council light–middleweight boxing championship. My wife was unfamiliar with professional boxing and was taken aback by the trash talking between the two foes, which HBO recapped during the intro to the show. “You’re going to be my bitch in my bed anytime I want you,” was one of Mr. Mayorga’s more printable insults.

Mr. De La Hoya won handily with a 6th round TKO, to the delight of many fans and my wife as well.

But, to her surprise, the fighters embraced after the fight and appeared to let bygones be bygones.
“You are a great fighter, a great champion,” Mr. Mayorga said. “I apologize for everything I said to you.”

How, she wondered, could everything be so easily settled?

The fact is, settling grievances through combat is pretty common. Kids at schools everywhere still “take it outside” and are often friends afterwards. Fighters in the boxing ring, the UFC, and other combat sports routinely find their grievances settled after a fight.

This is sometimes referred to as “the warrior’s ethic.” If a problem can’t be talked out, it can be settled by combat, often followed by mutual respect between winner and the loser.

David Yeagley, who spoke several times at American Renaissance conferences, was a Comanche activist who understood the warrior ethic:


Thursday, August 11, 2011

Negroes Rising

David Yeagley

David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle.

========

Unfortunately, the Negro in the White House has had a dire and deleterious effect on the world. It’s all about race, not economy. The Communist theory of equally distributed wealth only brings out the fact that class war, in every place where there are non-white people cohabiting white societies, the poor are in fact the darkies, the Negroes, the non-whites. Class struggle is race struggle.

Conservative talkers, ever fearful of talking about race, faithfully avoid its mention in connection with the riots across the globe. It seems that all riots are about socio-economic issues, not about race, even when racial groups riot against other races.

Yesterday Sean Hannity spoke the entire day, by radio and TV, about the riots in London, and carefully, passionately identified the riots as the result of liberalism. The expectation of government aid, the deep-seated dependency, the right to hand-outs–when denied, result in socially immature behavior, like, violence. “We’re getting our taxes back,” shouted a rioting looter. BadEagle.com brought out the fact that the rioters in Tottenham (London) were African, or, Negro. This fact, however, was discovered by research, not from media reports.

And now, today, Laura Ingraham is lamenting the complete abandonment of morality, but without any reference to Negroes making white people strip in the streets. It is a behavioral issue, not a racial issue, so say these careful conservatives. Even the BBC hid the faces of riotors, trusting that their beloved British accent would give the illusion that the knaves were white, not black.

All this, in spite of the fact that, in America, Negroes attacked white people at the Wisconsin State Fair, and in fact, the infamous Memorial Day beach closings in Chicago were caused by blacks attacking whites on the beach, and not because of heat or temperatures. The media completely lied about that, covering up the dramatic attacks and the fact that they were explicitly racial, blacks against innocent whites. Even the few news reports of “flash gangs” were careful not to make an issue of the fact that the gangs were black. That part of the story was all on personal cell phones and twitter accounts. Few professional news agencies are willing to call it what it is: black teens looking for trouble.

Chicago news likes to call it “flash mob” activity, or ‘wilding’ incidents. In the old days, in the South, it used to be called “pack niggers,” who, like wild dogs, went out to attack, to loot, to do violence–for the glory of it. (True it is, that kind of glory, itself, isn’t related to race at all.) But now days, educated liberals feel sophisticated to call is social frustration, or the pursuit of economic justice, or some other justified explanation that exonerates the packs from responsibility for their actions.


Katharine Birbalsingh

Veteran Hindu school teacher of London’s inner city system Katherine Birbalsingh posted a headline, “These riots were about race. Why ignore the fact?”

MORE

Friday, February 24, 2012

Upcoming conferences

Mises Institute: Circle at Furman
Location: Furman University, Greenville, South Carolina
Date: Feb. 25
Topic: War: Big Government's Best Friend
Speakers: Thomas DiLorenzo, Robert Higgs, Thomas Woods, Douglas French
More info: http://mises.org/events/157/Mises-Circle-at-Furman-University-Sponsored-by-Furman-Conservative-Students-for-a-Better-Tomorrow

American Renaissance Conference
Location: Near Nashville, Tennessee
Date: March 16 - 18
Topic: Censorship and the defense of Western Civilization
Speakers: Guillaume Faye, Richard Lynn, Robert Weissberg, Donald Templer, Jared Taylor, Sam Dickson, David A. Yeagley, etc.
More info: http://amren.com/conference2012/


Ascent of Man Conference
Location: Seattle, Washington
Date: June 21 - 23
Topic: HBD (human biodiversity), Genetics, and Political Correctness
Speakers: Gregory Cochran, Henry Harpending, Michael Hart, Walter Kistler, Dennis Mangan, Steve Sailer, etc.
More info: http://www.washsummit.com/conference/


League of the South National Conference
Location: Wallsboro, Alabama
Date: July 20 - 21
Topic: Bringing Communities Back To Life
Speakers: Michael Peroutka, Franklin Sanders, Mike Tuggle, Michael Hill
More info: http://dixienet.org/rights/2012_LSNC.php


Abbeville Institute Summer School
Location: Seabrook Island, South Carolina
Date: July 24 - 29
Topic: Greatness of Southern Literature, Pt. II
Speakers: Donald Livingston, Clyde Wilson, et al.
More info: http://abbevilleinstitute.org/2011SS/2011SS.php


HL Mencken Club
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Date: Nov. 9 - 11
Topic: TBA
Anticipated speakers: Steve Sailer, Henry Harpending, John Derbyshire, Paul Gottfried, Christian Kopff, etc.
More info: http://www.hlmenckenclub.org


John Randolph Club
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Date: Nov. 16 - 18
Topic: TBA
Anticipated speakers: Thomas Fleming, Scott Richert, Christopher Check, Aaron Wolf, etc.
More info: http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/rockford-institute/

Friday, November 11, 2016

Two paths for the Alt-Right

Via Iver

 David Yeagley

 ..........in order to be left alone to live as we see fit, we have to band together, put on our armored battlesuits, and march in the name of the God-Emperor to eradicate every remnant of SJW that survives anywhere in the world with all the fanaticism of the Spanish Inquisition unrestrained by Pope, King, or Queen, then that is precisely what we will do. We are the vanguard now. We are the God-Emperor's shock troops. We are Les Deplorables and WE. DON'T. CARE.

 Wired predicts in-fighting and failure for the Alt-Right:

The movement may soon find itself with a messaging problem. “Their whole attraction is they’re fighting to regain power,” says Gerstenfeld. “I don’t think they’ll do a good job spreading that message when they are in power and there’s nothing to fight against.” Gerstenfeld points out that the extremist militia groups that were common during Bill Clinton’s presidency all but disappeared during the George Bush years that followed. With Trump in the White House, it’ll be hard for the alt-right to argue that the American white male is disenfranchised. “People will stop caring,” Gerstenfeld says.

And though Taylor and David Duke and Breitbart’s Milo Yiannopoulos are exuberant about President Trump now, they might not always feel that way. “There’s a gaping hole between most Americans and the alt-right. He’s going to have to backtrack to govern all of us,” Painter says. “Is that going to inspire a Bundy brothers insurgency against him? I wouldn’t be surprised.” The Trump administration is not the early days of an alt-right America. It’s the beginning of a fringe group’s fall.
This indicates an almost complete failure to even begin to grasp what the Alt-Right is, what it seeks to accomplish, or why it exists in the first place. Do they really believe that the Ascension of the God-Emperor to the Cherry Blossom Throne is going to instantly reverse the current demographic trends across the West? I certainly wish we could believe that, but a single national election is but a single small step in the process.

Richard Spencer's article, We the Vanguard Now, would appear to be considerably more relevant to life as we observe it on this particular planet at this particular point in time.

More @ Vox Popoli

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Let the Muslims Destroy Themselves

David Yeagley

Why should any free nation want to intervene in Libya? Muslims don’t want freedom. They care nothing for democracy or anything Western (but money). It is not a righteous act for European nations, much less for America, to intervene for the sake of any supposed cause of Libyan people.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy declared that Moamar Gaddafi’s Libyan government has lost all credibility when it attacked its own people. Of the military strikes against Gaddafi’s government, Sarkozy said,

We are doing it to protect the civilian population from the murderous madness of a regime that in killing its own people has lost all legitimacy.

I don’t recall France making such a declaration when the Yankees attacked the “rebels” of the American South during America’s Civil War. France remained officially neutral during the entire war. In fact, most French diplomats openly favored the North. Furthermore, when the secessionist of Charleston, South Carolina fired on Fort Sumter in the Charleston Harbor, no other nation recognized the states rights advocates. No other nation ever recognized the South as an independent nation, nor sought to help them become independent.

Monday, September 26, 2011

American Indian Genocide: An Appeal to the United Nations

Bad Eagle

The following is an open letter (slightly modified) addressed to the United Nations. I am introducing the matter of American Indian mascot, logo, and name removal from American college and university athletic teams. This practice is in fact more than “virtual” genocide or “virtual” ethnic cleansing. According to the 1948 UN Convention Mandate, it is genocide.

Mr. Francis M. Deng
Mr. Juan Méndez
Mr. Edward Luck
Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide
866 United Nations Plaza, Suite 600
New York, NY 10017 USA

Gentlemen,

I respectfully present the matter of American Indian genocide (not past, but present) before your august reserves of experience and wisdom. I am an enrolled member of the Comanche Nation, an American Indian tribe, with a long family history known from the 19th century. I do not hold office in the Comanche Nation, nor do I profess to speak for the Comanche Nation. I do, however, believe that the matter of American Indian genocide is a living concern for all Indians, and I present before you the case in the matter of the systematic eradication of American Indian (“Native American”) mascots, monikers, logos, and names from American public view, and the prevention of their use by American colleges, universities, and some professional athletic corporations.

According to the Mandate of the 1948 UN Convention, 260 (III), Articles I, II, and III, (pp.174, 175), the modern established practice of removing Indian images from public view, so as to eradicate their memory and visual presence, constitutes genocide. I especially call your attention to Article II (b):

“…Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, such as; …(b) causing serious mental harm to members of the group.”

Parties sharing responsibility for this aspect of genocide against American Indians are: The United States Commission on Civil Rights (as of 2001), The National Collegiate Athletic Association, and numerous individuals whose profession has involved active campaigning for the removal of American Indian images from public view. This effort of eradication has been systematic, and has continued for at least four decades.

American Indians, as a race, a people, or as individual nations, have never assented to this visual genocide. There have been only two professional surveys of American Indians, and both of which suggest that 90% of American Indians are opposed to the eradication of Indian images, monikers, and names used in the athletic field, amateur or professional: Peter Harris (2002), and Annenberg Foundation (2004).

I submit to you that such eradication of the Indian images, images that were essentially earned with the historical blood of American Indian warriors, is a devastating humiliation to the self-esteem of modern American Indians. It debilitates the potential social relations between Indians and non-Indian Americans, and severely cripples the identity of the modern American Indian. The removal of the images is vicious identity destruction, robbing the Indian of his history, his honor, and the whole reason he has retained United States government treaty provision and Indian sovereignty.

Thus, the removal of Indian images represents a genocidal effort, and therefore must be considered by the United Nations. I am prepared to pursue this matter with you, providing documents and data verifying my claims.

I realize that presently the OSAPG is occupied with literal blood slaughter of peoples in different parts of the world. However, it is abundantly clear that the 1948 Convention and Mandate on Genocide includes more than physical destruction itself under the definition of “genocide.” I would also point out that Ronald Reagan signed the Mandate in 1988. The United States must make the effort to comply with the provisions of the Mandate.

I humbly thank you for your timely consideration.

Sincerely,
Dr. David A. Yeagley
The Bad Eagle Foundation
P.O. Box 75017
Oklahoma City, OK 73147

Thursday, March 10, 2011

"And let the South rise again!"

David Yeagley

A Quick Commentary on Current Events

"I recently finished composing a kind of magnum opus, a monster sonata for piano solo. It is in the printing process, and I will soon list it on DavidYeagley.com, my less than professional music site. I am also working furiously on my law suit, with, I would say, inadequate funding. It is also springtime, and there will be plenty of yard and house work to do.

In other words, I’m a bit behind on the blogging bit. So, I thought I’d simply make some quick comments on the major stories."

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

They’re traitors.



BAD EAGLE
VERBATIM POST
=====================

The Fall of the House

by David Yeagley · August 2, 2011

It is the fall of the House, and the Senate. The “debt crisis” has been going on for months in Congress, and BadEagle.com has said nothing about it. Now that the United States Congress, both the House and the Senate, with the illegal signature of the illegal traitor in the Oval Office, have all demonstrated their anti-American values, I think it is appropriate to say just a word.

They’re traitors.


Gabriel Giffords, Democrat Congressman from Arizona,
magically appeared to vote “Yes,” and to celebrate
with her colleagues the end of America.

But not all. Michele Bachmann stands at the helm of those Tea Party patriots, and she voted “no” on the debt deal, having been against it from the beginning, based on principle. She even voted “no” on Cut, Cap, and Balance–because it was inadequate. Opponents of the debt deal have been demonized, but they are the only true Americans when it comes to very basic, constitutional principles. Among talk show hosts, Mark Levin was first to call this debt “compromise” deal what it is–complete failure of constitutional principle. Rush Limbaugh has certainly dramatized the failure of the Congress. He calls it fear. Republicans fear being blamed, being criticized, being called names. Republicans are cowards. Never mind their principles–which most of them compromise at the slightest challenge, rather than be criticized.


Michele Bachmann, the Tea Party representative in DC, one
of the few who votes from principle, not for political advantage.

Talkers like Laura Ingraham pride themselves on “compromise” as being better than nothing. They base their decision on myopic party moves, or political strategy, not principle. But, part of a principle is not that principle. The principle is compromised, therefore nullified completely. Politics, however, is all about compromise these days. Republicans are politicians–and very, very weak ones at that.


Laura Ingraham, who condemned
Michele Bachmann for not compromising.

Hat tip to TheRightScoop.com

There is no point in lauding “compromise” or “reaching across the isle” when it means the sinking of American economy, and thus destroying the nation. There is nothing honorable in “yielding” place to the enemy, Republican of Democrat. Republicans have failed. The Tea Party just isn’t quite large enough to prevail, yet.

This entire debt crisis was fabricated–by the Democrats and their leaders, with the cooperation of Republican leaders. It was artificial from the beginning, like every other “crisis” Black Barry has created since he false swore to be “president.” It’s all about ruining America through economic chaos. That is the Communist playbook plan, well articulated by Sol Alinksky and demonstrated by the Cloward-Pivens initiatives–all plainly exposed in The Shadow Party (2006), by Richard Poe and David Horowitz. Poe has appeared on Glenn Beck programs many times talking about all this.

Washington is now political Hollywood. It’s all scripted and theatrical. It’s all about recesses, vacations, and appearances. This is where the “deadlines” come from. They fraudulently create “crises” dates, based on their own personal and political convenience.

And it’s about ‘us versus them,’ or, the governors versus the governed. The irony is that we elect them–the governors. Only they weren’t elected to govern. They were elected to represent us, we the people. WE, the people, are the governors. It is government ‘by the people.’

Washington is a diseased place. They that go there, with rare exception, become diseased. They are infected within weeks after arriving. I think it’s called bribery. They are controlled by senior congressmen, lobbyists, etc., and they are generally bought off. The disease is called money.

The scripted artifice and vomitable effrontery was most triumphant when Gabriel Giffords made her first appearance on the floor of Congress after she was shot last January. She came the moment the House passed the death sentence on the American economy. She came to celebrate the victory. This glorious appearance was supposed to congratulate the comprise, and award all those who had struggled so hard to destroy the economy.

BadEagle.com has spoken in behalf of Gabriel Giffords from the day she was shot. Out of pure human sympathy, we have supported her, prayed for her, and encouraged those caring for her to buoy up her spirits with faith. We have waited patiently for some sign of gratitude to God on her behalf. We have heard nothing, from any quarter. And now she makes a perfectly timed appearance to celebrate the demise of America. Shall we put two and two together?

And they’re calling Senator Harry Read, senate majority leader, “Leader Read.” This is a distinct echo of Nazi Germany. They called Hitler der Fürher, “the leader.” Leader Read. Fürher Read. Incredibly obvious. How blatant can they be? Media trends, is that what we’re to wright it off as? Nazi Germany was a media trend, in the beginning.

The Tea Party will have to make another giant effort for this 2012 election. For now, says Limbaugh, “We’re living in a ponzi scheme.”
Democrats continue to demonize wealth–wealth that the Democrats want to control that is, and, as Führer Read says the government will now continue to pursue the wealthy, to tax them, to redistribute wealth, and to create larger government, and to make more and more people dependent on the government.

Monday, May 21, 2012

Netanyahu Warns Israel of African “Infiltration”


David Yeagley @ American Renaissance 2012

Facing the classic threat of a hostile ethnic take-over, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently warned Israel that the nation could be overcome by African “infiltrators.” Even as Kosovo was usurped by massive Albanian Muslims immigrants, Israel could be lost to the subversive effects of uncontrolled influx of African population.

Surely, such a statement must have broken the hearts of all the liberal Jews in the world. But, when reality collides with ideology, one has to choose one’s preferences. Reality demands it. Though ideology, especially liberal ideology, works methodically against nature and reality, in the end, liberals have to face the self-destruction their ideology has engendered.

Interestingly, the AP wire on Netanyahu’s statements shows how the liberal reporter struggles to tell the true story. “African migrants” is the term in the headline. “Infiltrators” is the word Netanyahu used (as later quoted by the reporter, in fact). Israel’s Haaretz posts the headline: Netanyahu: Israel could be overrun by African infiltrators The ‘moderate’ Haaretz story is nevertheless much more forceful.

Netanyahu praises the border fence being built in southern Israel (–the AP mentioned neither the praise nor the fence). The crime (rape noted specifically) brought in by “the phenomenon of illegal infiltrators from Africa is extremely serious and threatens Israel’s social fabric and national security.”

“If we don’t stop the problem, 60,000 infiltrators are liable to become 600,000, and cause the negation of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.”

Netanyahu also said it was vital to “physically remove the infiltrators. We must crack down and mete out tougher punishments.”

Now, the liberal element is Israel interprets the existence of Israel as a haven created for Holocaust survivors, and, by ideological extension, must invite anyone who claims oppression–even from poverty itself, to share in the bounties of Israel.

Sharing can be suicidal.

Are the fountains of charity everlasting? Are liberals like the Almighty? Are no people to pay the price of their own errors? Is Africa innocent?

The AP wire does not identify the “infiltrators” other than “African.” The Haaretz article, however, is explicit. Yishai said, of liberal justification for the infiltrators:

“All these stupidities will bring us the births of hundreds of people and we can bury the Zionist dream,” he said. “Jobs will just root them here … and this suggestion will only bring hundreds of thousands more here.”

But then the professional liberals reportedly retorted:

The United Nations High Commission for Refugees refutes Yishai’s claim that “only a fraction of [the migrants] are defined as refugees, and whoever is designated a refugee gets [residency] status.” UNHCR says that between 40,000-45,000 asylum-seekers here are from Eritrea, 15,000 are from Sudan and another 6,000 are from other countries to which repatriation isn’t currently possible.

So, the truth comes out. These are raw Africans, not the traditional Ethiopian claimants to Solomon’s throne. So, apparently one scam leads to a worse one. Many of these must be Muslim! Thus, Netanyahu uses the word “infiltrators.”

The liberals want the illegal infiltrators to be housed in good neighborhoods and given the best treatment. Interior Minister Eli Yishai “said that most African migrants are criminals and that all, ‘without exception,’ should be arrested and deported.”

More @ Bad Eagle

Saturday, November 14, 2015

Why Communism Loves Children

Via comment by sj on UM Black Culture Center Vandalized Overnight]

 David Yeagley

By Bad Eagle

Communism needs children. Only children will obey the tyranny of adult delusions without question. 

Only the young are naïve enough to hate all authority and to destroy all achievement. For youth, Communism is not a delusion but an exciting, heroic cause. 

Cambodia’s Pol Pot knew this. He overtook his country on April 17, 1975, with a huge gang of young teenagers called the Khmer Rouge. Through these obedient subjects, Pol Pot The Tuol Sleng Museum, Phnom Penh, Cambodia ) murdered nearly 2 million people of his own nation, one-third of the population. In less than four years, Pol Pot created a society of pure Communism—ghastly, murderous tyranny.

                                        More @ Front Page

Sunday, September 18, 2011

A New Indian Suit: Yeagley v. Communists

When American Indians surrendered our weapons, there was only one hope left for us: the White Man’s law. That same law may be the last hope of American patriots today.

As an American Indian patriot, I just sued the enemies of American freedom. On August 8, 2011, I filed against the people who have attempted to deny First Amendment rights to American Renaissance, myself, and VDARE.com. I have sued Daryle Lamont Jenkins, One People’s Project, and others; and an unspecified number of “John Does” to be revealed in the suit.

These professional protesters have been a menace to American freedom for years. They have recently succeeded in shutting down the American Renaissance conferences in 2010 and 2011 by directly threatening the hotel host management and employees. Their adverse and egregious influence is growing.

As an Indian, I did what every American has to be willing to do: I sued them.

Otherwise, we may eventually all lose our freedoms, forever.

I’ll not be robbed twice. Indians lost the first wars with the White Man, but, all Americans are threatened this second time—by white Oedipal liberals. I’ll not have anti-Americans, of any color, rob me again—at least not without a fight.

Can I count on the patriot White Man to join me—to defend the very country he created, this glorious land we call America?

I was scheduled to be a speaker at the 2010 American Renaissance Conference. But the conference was cancelled—repeatedly. Hotel after hotel reneged on their contracts, folding under the intimidation of street thugs.

Who is behind them?

There are larger supporters than those first named in the suit. One People’s Project, one of the organizations known to be involved in attacking, is sponsored by the Brecht Forum, a well-established Marxist organization in New York City. This is openly acknowledged on the One People’s Project web site.

The vice-president for Human Affairs of United Steel Workers International, Fred Redmond, ran a piece in TheHill.com, “Shun Bigots” (TK DATE), condemning American Renaissance—and anyone associated with it. And other groups were involved in publicly protesting the AmRen conference.

Non-violent protest is a First Amendment right. But threatening hotels is not.

Communists exist in multitudinous groups across the country, all “community organized” and able to create a protest, a political crisis, a street brawl, at any time, in any place. Communist groups are arguably the predecessors of today’s “flash mobs”. (We might wonder who is really behind the flash mobs).

Friday, March 25, 2011

Deborah Pauly, Patriot: Muslims Go Home!

David Yeagley

She’s only a city councilman in Villa Park, California, but Deborah Pauly gives new meaning to the American blonde (dyed or natural). She’s a daring, heroic patriot. She’s already earned her death threats–from oedipal white liberals shilling for Sharia. Why?

Councilman Pauly wants to give Islam the boot. She purposely held a public meeting outside a Muslim “charity” event, and there Pauly called that event “pure, unadulterated evil.” Two of the speakers at the Muslim “charity” event are known terrorist advocates, and the event was put on by The Islamic Circle of North America, a famous fundraiser for the Holy Land Foundation as well as a blatant HAMAS supporter. Federal agents have been watching ICNA for over a decade. These are precisely the kind of “charity” organizations that use the willing “good” Muslims to front their fund-raising for terrorists. Unadulterated evil, indeed.