Should Obama be elected for a second term it is likely that he will be assassinated for a host of reasons just as there was a host of reasons to NOT assassinate him during his first term. But remember, Americans do not assassinate their politicians, but elements within their government do. 25 Congressmen and other USA government officers were responsible for the shooting of Abraham Lincoln, not the Confederate government.
This record was discovered in 1960 in the coded Military Journal of Lafayette Baker, Lincoln's head of the secret service (known as the National Detective Police and numbered just over 2,000 agents under Lincoln). The message of Baker who was also soon murdered was decoded and is now being read by some historians. The USA Sec. of War Edwin Stanton was also murdered shortly after the president refused to appoint him to the U.S. Supreme Court. He was found with his throat slashed by a straight razor which the USA government claimed was a suicide even though that was very unlikely.
When I was younger I found so much satisfaction in the assassination of Lincoln that I held Booth as a hero, but now I realise that there is more to learn about the extreme tyranny of the USA when it is understood "WHY" the top ranking members of the USA government and key industrial and banking entities planned and executed Lincoln's murder. Little is learned from history when we do not have "The Rest of the Story" and we rarely have the rest of the story when we have strongly centralized governments.
-- The NOVA Institute (White Paper)
I'm afraid this piece is factually incorrect. Despite reservations, Grant did actually appoint Stanton to the Supreme Court, and Stanton was confirmed as an Associate Justice only a couple of weeks before his death.
ReplyDeleteThe author is likely getting Edwin Stanton mixed up with his brother, Dr. Darwin Stanton who did in fact cut his own throat--well before the Civil War began.
The rumor of Stanton's suicide has no basis in historical fact, and was in fact a brutal rumor circulated by a handful of partisan newspapers at the times, and in at least one occasion, made it out that he killed himself from the guilt of killing Mary Surratt.
This sort of unsubstantiated speculation does little for for any serious study of these matters.
I'll send it to the man and thanks.
DeleteNo worries, and thank you! I know how much effort you put into this site!
DeleteHe replied with a thank you and said he would check into it.
DeleteI have always believed that Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by his own globalist ilk, no matter what the Stanton's might, or might not have had to do with his justified murder, if that is what one might like to call it. I call it justified homicide of a wannabe communist dictator.
ReplyDeletejustified homicide of a wannabe communist dictator.
DeleteNo complaint here.:)
Nor here, except that it came 10 years late.
ReplyDeleteI would have been pleased at his first inauguration.
DeleteI too have an interest in this and had commented to Mr Manning inquiring about information concerning the journal of Lafayette Baker. It would or could be of significant importance if we could read the rest of Baker's writings. I'm wondering how much of those writings are currently available for the lowest peons such as myself to look at and study?
ReplyDeleteI also am firmly convinced that it was the bankers who had Lincoln assassinated. The big motive here was that while the bankers were the main force getting Lincoln elected, Lincoln alienated the bankers when he issued the interest free Greenbacks refusing to pay the app. 30% interest the bankers were demanding for paying for the war. Lincoln also irritated the bankers in his speech to the bankers with his comment on the National Bank Act in February 1863, in which he stated, "In saving the union I have destroyed the Republic."
The bankers surely had motive to have him assassinated. And I would surely like more information on who was behind it, like from Baker's journals.
Thanks,
Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur
"In saving the union I have destroyed the Republic."
ReplyDeleteThe bankers surely had motive to have him assassinated. And I would surely like more information on who was behind it, like from Baker's journals.
I agree, Sir.
I've read somewhere concerning Baker's journals that most of it has been released and studied. If so; why haven't we and especially I, gotten more details on it? Just to start I want to know more about those 25 congressmen and the anyone else involved. I want to take and examine those people and study their connections to other people and organizations, especially the bankers! I think we would find the necessary connections there.
ReplyDeleteI would even like for any website, even this one to post such materials as Baker's journals if they could get them and let all of us examine them. We could hold our own inquiry right here. No telling how much attention it could get...
Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur
Michael:
ReplyDeleteIf you can find a link, I will be more than happy to post it.
Well, that's what everyone is lacking. We hear all this about Baker's journal, and that's it's been decoded and read and all that stuff. Yet I have NEVER ever seen anything related to it and I doubt if anyone else has either.
ReplyDeleteBecause of that last statement, this begs many questions; Why hasn't anyone seen it? Any copies or details? Where is it? If it does exist and people have it and it's been decoded; Why haven't they posted it? Has it not been several years since this was claimed to be found? How long does it take to get this information otu to the public? Why hasn't some historian wrote this in some published book concerning history regardless to the side/pov of the historian?
It just seems to me there is more going here than what is first indicated... Because if this stuff really did exist many people such as us would be having a FIELD DAY ramming it down the Federalists throats! So either it's been covered up and rehidden or it simply doesn't exist. That is my thoughts on the matter.
Get a copy of it here and we'll make waves all across the country; IF Baker's journal really exists, having what is claimed in it.
Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur
I'm searching now.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAbakerLaf.htm
Lafayette Baker's Handwriting Analysis
http://itwasjohnson.impiousdigest.com/zero12.htm
A certificate of authenticity by handwriting expert Stanley S. Smith, Captain P.S.P.; regarding Neff's copy of Colburn's United Service Magazine/Naval and Military Journal, 1864; Part II, London.
Yup, untold links mention it and that's it, so I guess it's a dead end, unless something surfaces.
DeleteYou mean with the likes of Clyde Wilson, Tom DiLorenzon (sp?) and all these other noted Southern historians, not one of them has ever seen this journal or had access to it? It sounds quiet odd to me...
ReplyDeleteMichael-- Deo Vindicabamur
I'm sure they would publish it far and wide if they did.:)
Delete